BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 109037
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.109037
Table 1 Characteristics of studies evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of cystic carcinoembryonic antigen and intracystic glycose for mucinous pancreatic cysts
Ref.
Type of study
Biomarker assessed
Patients included
Cut-off
Sensitivity
Secificity
AUROC
van der Waaij et al[24], 2005Pooled analysisCEA450< 5 ng/mL50% (for PC, SCA)95% (for PC, SCA)-
> 800 ng/mL48%98%
Thosani et al[25], 2010Meta-analysisCEA376-63% (pooled)88% (pooled)0.89
Thornton et al[26], 2013Meta-analysisCEA1438-63% (pooled)88% (pooled)-
Brugge et al[27], 2004Multicenter study -prospective collection of dataCEA341192 ng/mL73%84%0.79
Park et al[28], 2011Single-center retrospectiveCEA124200 ng/mL60%93%0.89
Gaddam et al[29], 2015Multicenter study, retrospective studyCEA226105 ng/mL70%63%0.77
192 ng/mL61%77%
Köker et al[31], 2021Retrospective studyCEA466100ng/mL--0.930 (for differentiating LR-IPMNs from LR-MCNs)
0.921 (for differentiating LR-IPMNs from HR-IPMNs)
kwan et al[33], 2024Single center, retrospectiveCEA116920 ng/mL89%64%0.80
192 ng/mL56%78%
Rossi et al[32], 2024Prospective observational multicenter studyCEA50192 ng/mL55.6%87.5%0.65
Intracystic glucose
(glucometer)
50 mg/dL93.2%76.5%0.74
Carr et al[36], 2018Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA153192 ng/mL58%96%0.92
Intracystic glucose (glucometer)50 mg/dL92%87%0.91
Gyimesi et al[38], 2024Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA91192 ng/mL67.5%97.5%-
Intracystic glucose (glucometer)50 mg/dL94.2%81.3%-
Gorris et al[39], 2023Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA6320 ng/mL, 192 ng/mL80%, 50%62%, 93%-
Intracystic glucose glucometer50 mg/dL100%45%
Laboratory50 mg/dL100%60%
Smith et al[41], 2022Multicenter - prospectively maintained databaseCEA93192 ng/mL62.7%88.2%0.81
Intracystic glucose (laboratory)25 mg/dL88.1%91.2%0.96
Ribeiro et al[42], 2024Single center, retrospective studyCEA78192 ng/mL55.6%87.5%-
Intracystic glucose50 mg/dL93.2%76.5%-
Glucometer laboratory---0.870, 0.912
Williet et al[43], 2023Multicenter study, retrospectiveCEA121192 ng/mL41.7%96.9%0.812
Intracystic glucose (laboratory)41.8 mg/dL95.3%91.2%0.936
McCarty et al[44], 2021Meta-analysisCEA609-56% (pooled)96% (pooled)-
Intracystic glucose91% (pooled)86% (pooled)
Faias et al[45], 2021Meta-analysisCEA5286-67% (pooled)80% (pooled)0.79
Intracystic glucose46091% (pooled)75% (pooled)0.95
Zikos et al[35], 2015Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA67192 ng/mL77%83%-
Intracystic glucose-50 mg/dL---
Laboratory--95%57%-
Glucometer--88%78%-
Faias et al[37], 2020Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA82192 ng/Ml72%96%0.842
Intracystic glucose (glucometer)50 mg/dL89%86%0.860
Simons-Linares et al[40], 2020Single center study -prospective collection of dataCEA113192 ng/mL50%92%0.78
Intracystic glucose41 mg/dL88%97%0.95
Laboratory21 mg/dL92%92%-
Guzmán-Calderón et al[46], 2022Meta-analysisCEA506-61% (pooled)93% (pooled)0.861 (pooled SROC)
Intracystic glucose91% (pooled)85% (pooled)0.959 (pooled SROC)
Mohan et al[47], 2022Meta-analysisIntracystic glucose56650mg/dL90.1%85.3%-
All methods of measurement-90.5% (pooled)88% (pooled)
Glucometer-89.5%83.9%


Write to the Help Desk