©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 107840
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840
Table 7 Specifications of endoscopic closure devices
| Device | Specifications |
| TTS clip[78,94] | Intermediate strength |
| Fast application but may be challenging in large defects | |
| Easy to deliver (beneficial in the right colon and in difficult locations) | |
| Good choice in defects smaller that 2-3 cm | |
| Alternative and combined methods are available | |
| Cost-effectiveness depends on the number of clips used but is usually well maintained | |
| OTS clip[78,94,107,159] | Intermediate strength in 15 mm defects |
| Low strength in 30 mm defects | |
| Medium prolonging of the procedure but its rather easy to apply after proper training | |
| The diameter of the tip of the scope is increased with additional device (16.5-21 mm) that has irregular edges - it may cause difficulty in an introduction of the scope through the larynx and strictures of all origins (including radiation) | |
| Poor visibility due to bleeding may make the application not possible | |
| May lead to stenosis | |
| Allows only one attempt to close the defect | |
| May inadvertently capture structures beyond the gastrointestinal wall as seen in the reports of unintended inclusion of organs and vessels adjacent to the target site | |
| The newly introduced OTSC cutting device (remOVE system; Ovesco) allows for the removal of a deployed OTSC. When cutting OTSC, the electric DC impulses are delivered by a special electric generator connected to the grasping device | |
| However, it is important to note that the OTSC cutting device has a 10- to 15-minute warm-up time before it can be used. Therefore, removing a misdeployed OTSC and deploying a second OTSC on the misfired location would entail a significant time lag | |
| EHS[78] | Appropriate for defects larger than 2-3 cm |
| Feasible in various locations and depths | |
| High strength and secure closure | |
| Takes more time and is difficult to perform (extensive training is appropriate) | |
| Overstitch[94] | High strength and secure closure |
| Takes more time and is difficult to perform (extensive training is appropriate) | |
| May inadvertently capture structures beyond the gastrointestinal wall as seen in the reports of unintended inclusion of organs and vessels adjacent to the target site | |
| Is significantly more expensive than other devices | |
| X-tack Helix[94] | Most beneficial in superficial defects smaller than 3 cm, but can be applied in more advances ones |
| Low strength | |
| Medium prolonging of the procedure | |
| Application may be challenging | |
| May be removed with fully rotatable rat tooth forceps | |
| Cost-effective in specific indications |
- Citation: Spychalski M, Orzeszko Z, Kasprzyk P. Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(10): 107840
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i10/107840.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840