BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 107840
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840
Table 7 Specifications of endoscopic closure devices
Device
Specifications
TTS clip[78,94]Intermediate strength
Fast application but may be challenging in large defects
Easy to deliver (beneficial in the right colon and in difficult locations)
Good choice in defects smaller that 2-3 cm
Alternative and combined methods are available
Cost-effectiveness depends on the number of clips used but is usually well maintained
OTS clip[78,94,107,159]Intermediate strength in 15 mm defects
Low strength in 30 mm defects
Medium prolonging of the procedure but its rather easy to apply after proper training
The diameter of the tip of the scope is increased with additional device (16.5-21 mm) that has irregular edges - it may cause difficulty in an introduction of the scope through the larynx and strictures of all origins (including radiation)
Poor visibility due to bleeding may make the application not possible
May lead to stenosis
Allows only one attempt to close the defect
May inadvertently capture structures beyond the gastrointestinal wall as seen in the reports of unintended inclusion of organs and vessels adjacent to the target site
The newly introduced OTSC cutting device (remOVE system; Ovesco) allows for the removal of a deployed OTSC. When cutting OTSC, the electric DC impulses are delivered by a special electric generator connected to the grasping device
However, it is important to note that the OTSC cutting device has a 10- to 15-minute warm-up time before it can be used. Therefore, removing a misdeployed OTSC and deploying a second OTSC on the misfired location would entail a significant time lag
EHS[78]Appropriate for defects larger than 2-3 cm
Feasible in various locations and depths
High strength and secure closure
Takes more time and is difficult to perform (extensive training is appropriate)
Overstitch[94]High strength and secure closure
Takes more time and is difficult to perform (extensive training is appropriate)
May inadvertently capture structures beyond the gastrointestinal wall as seen in the reports of unintended inclusion of organs and vessels adjacent to the target site
Is significantly more expensive than other devices
X-tack Helix[94]Most beneficial in superficial defects smaller than 3 cm, but can be applied in more advances ones
Low strength
Medium prolonging of the procedure
Application may be challenging
May be removed with fully rotatable rat tooth forceps
Cost-effective in specific indications


Write to the Help Desk