©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 107840
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840
Table 5 Complication rates and risk factors in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
| Ref. | Country of origin | Perforation | Delayed bleeding |
| Albouys et al[59] | France | - | 8.0% |
| Risk factors: Age > 74 years, use of antihrombotics, rectal location, size > 50 mm, ASA score III or IV | |||
| Seo et al[60] | South Korea | - | 2.9% |
| Risk factors: Tumor location in the rectosigmoid colon, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, use of antiplatelet agents except for aspirin alone | |||
| Lim et al[91] | - | 4%-8% | - |
| Tanaka et al[157] | - | 4.7% | - |
| Kim et al[15] | - | 20.4% risk factors: Tumor size, fibrosis | - |
| Saito et al[158] | - | Intraprocedural: 4.9% | - |
| Delayed: 0.4% | |||
| Risk factor: Tumor size > 5 cm | |||
| Akintoye et al[153] | - | Intraprocedural: 4.2% | 2.1% |
| Delayed: 0.22% |
- Citation: Spychalski M, Orzeszko Z, Kasprzyk P. Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(10): 107840
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i10/107840.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.107840