Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2024; 16(3): 136-147
Published online Mar 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.136
Figure 2
Figure 2 Representative cases of incorrect scaling. A: Underscaling case. The tumor size was evaluated as 30 mm; B: Pathology revealing the maximal diameter as 49 mm, wherein the size discrepancy was -39%; C: Overscaling case. The cancerous lesion was evaluated as 20 mm; D: The pathological size was 15 mm, resulting in a size discrepancy of 33%.