©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2022; 14(5): 302-310
Published online May 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.302
Published online May 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.302
| Colonoscopy | EGD |
| High quality bowel preparation (excellent, good, or adequate), documented with photos | At least 1 min of inspection per centimeter of circumferential segment of Barrett’s esophagus |
| Digital rectal examination prior to colonoscopy with results documented | NDR record should be considered |
| When evaluating for gastric intestinal metaplasia, 5 or more biopsies need to be taken | |
| Cecal intubation performed, landmarks noted in documentation and photos recorded | Overall, EGD evaluation for gastric intestinal metaplasia has to last 7 min or more |
| Withdrawal time is 6 min or more | |
| Retroflexion, if performed, is thoroughly documented (with photographs) | |
| Endoscopists ADR exceeds recommended thresholds. Physician participates in quality-improvement and continues to measure individual ADR |
- Citation: Turshudzhyan A, Rezaizadeh H, Tadros M. Lessons learned: Preventable misses and near-misses of endoscopic procedures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14(5): 302-310
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v14/i5/302.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.302