Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2021; 13(8): 238-259
Published online Aug 16, 2021. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238
Table 2 Representative studies of the effectiveness of intragastric balloons
Ref.
Study type
Cases
Balloon type
Mo
Mean BMI loss kg/m2
Mean BWL kg
%TWL
%EWL
Genco et al[64], 2005Observational 2515Bioenterics64.9 ± 12.7
Kotzampassi et al[13], 2012Observational 500Bioenterics67.39 ± 3.5721.19 ± 10.3 38.09 ± 20.18
Lopez-Nava et al[67], 2011Observational 714Bioenterics66.5 ± 12.718.8 ± 941.6 ± 21.8
Fittipaldi-Fernandez et al[68], 2020Observational 5874air-filled619.13 ± 8.86 18.42 ± 7.2565.66 ± 36.24
Abu Dayyeh et al[71], 2019Observational 187Spatz3914.9 ± 7.2 plus 4.7*
Fittipaldi-Fernandez et al[45], 2020Observational 180Spatz37.12 ± 1.63 6.18 ± 4.07 17.51 ± 11.6716.22 ± 9.7456.68 ± 40.12
Schwaab et al[72], 2020Cross-sectional 360/144Orbera/Spatz36 up to 1215.4 ± 7/15.5 ± 9.6
Sullivan et al[73], 2018RCT185/181Obalon/sham66.6 ± 5.1/3.4 ± 5.0
Ienca et al[58], 2020Observational 1770Elipse44.9 ± 2.013.5 ± 5.8 14.2 ± 5.067.0 ± 64.1
Genco et al[59], 2018Observational 38Elipse44.2 12.7 11.626
Taha et al[77], 2020Observational 96Elipse44.9 ± 2.011.2 ± 5.112.1 ± 5.2
Ponce et al[47], 2015RCT187/139ReShapeDuo diet/exercise625.1 ± 1.6/11.3 ± 1.9
Agnihotri et al[50], 2018Observational 202ReShapeDuo611.7 ± 7.311.4 ± 6.729.9 ± 18.2