Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.4253/wjge.v11.i12.573

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 12

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6718)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

562

WORD

324

HTML

3321

Figures (1-4)

210

Tables (1-1)

160

Sum=4577

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

946

Download

1195

Sum=2141

Dec 16, 2019 (publication date) through Apr 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (24)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2019; 11(12): 573-588
Published online Dec 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i12.573

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow diagram of included and excluded clinical trials.

Citation: Delgado AAA, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, Bazarbashi AN, dos Santos MEL, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(12): 573-588
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i12/573.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i12.573