Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2018; 10(8): 130-144
Published online Aug 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130
Table 3 Frequency of outcomes based on systematic review
SphincterotomySphincterotomy associated with balloon dilationP
Stone removal rate773/837 (92.3%)786/837 (93.9%)0.10
Stone removal rate with stones greater than 15 mm218/240 (90.8%)228/244 (93.4%)0.14
Pancreatitis48/891 (5.3%)40/911 (4.4%)0.16
Bleeding31/891 (3.4%)18/911 (1.9%)0.02
Cholangitis7/891 (0.78%)7/911 (0.76%)0.48
Perforation5/911 (0.54%)0/891 (0)0.08
Use of mechanical lithotripsy262/910 (28.8%)105/914 (11.5%)< 0.00001
Use of mechanical lithotripsy with stones greater than 15 mm115/218 (52.7%)54/214 (25.2%)< 0.00001

  • Citation: de Clemente Junior CC, Bernardo WM, Franzini TP, Luz GO, dos Santos MEL, Cohen JM, de Moura DTH, Marinho FRT, Coronel M, Sakai P, de Moura EGH. Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(8): 130-144
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v10/i8/130.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130