临床经验
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
世界华人消化杂志. 2015-01-08; 23(1): 147-152
在线出版 2015-01-08. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v23.i1.147
表2 血浆miR-210、CA199、CA242、CEA及联合在各组间的诊断效能
分组敏感性(%)特异性(%)准确性(%)LR+LR-
胰腺癌组 vs 正常组
miR-210 96.7 50.0 90.0 1.93 0.07
CA199 91.7 30.0 82.9 1.31 0.28
CA242 98.3 10.0 85.7 1.09 0.17
CEA 100.0 0.0 85.7 -- --
CA199+CA242+CEA 93.3 30.0 84.3 1.33 0.22
miR-210+CA199 96.7 70.0 92.9 3.22 0.05
miR-210+CA199+CA242+CEA 96.7 70.0 92.9 3.22 0.05
胰腺癌组 vs 慢性胰腺炎组
miR-210 95.0 25.0 77.5 1.14 0.22
CA199 81.7 80.0 81.3 4.08 0.23
CA242 85.0 30.0 71.3 1.21 0.50
CEA 100.0 0.0 75.0 -- --
CA199+CA242+CEA 81.7 75.0 80.0 3.27 0.24
miR-210+CA199 90.0 85.0 88.8 6.00 0.12
miR-210+CA199+CA242+CEA 90.0 85.0 88.8 6.00 0.12
胰腺癌组 vs 慢性胰腺炎组+正常组
miR-210 86.7 40.0 71.1 1.44 0.33
CA199 78.3 93.3 83.3 11.75 0.23
CA242 76.7 83.3 78.9 4.60 0.28
CEA 98.3 10.0 68.9 1.09 0.17
CA199+CA242+CEA 80.0 93.3 84.4 12.00 0.21
miR-210+CA199 88.3 90.0 88.9 8.83 0.13
miR-210+CA199+CA242+CEA 86.7 90.0 87.8 8.67 0.15

引文著录: 胡应霞, 张海蓉, 石围, 唐君瑞. 血浆miR-210联合血清肿瘤标志物对胰腺癌的诊断价值. 世界华人消化杂志 2015; 23(1): 147-152