临床经验
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2013.
世界华人消化杂志. 2013-12-28; 21(36): 4158-4163
在线出版 2013-12-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v21.i36.4158
表2 血浆RAS(PRA、Ang I、Ang II)与NAFLD严重程度及生化指标的关系
指标 PRA
Ang I
Ang II
rPrPrP
NAFLD严重程度10.276b0.0000.303d0.0000.280f0.000
肝/脾C t值比1-0.190a0.029-0.182c0.035-0.210e0.014
ALT0.1120.0520.167d0.0040.159f0.006
AST0.0550.3420.1070.0650.0790.174
GGT0.225b0.0000.202d0.0000.252f0.000
CHE0.1010.1390.159c0.0190.0800.239
TG0.0730.2120.139c0.0160.1070.065
TC0.1120.0540.0490.4030.0530.359
HDL-C-0.1140.050-0.114c0.049-0.1000.086
LDL-C0.149a0.0100.0960.0980.0810.163
FBG-0.0240.693-0.0020.979-0.0390.514
PRA--0.674d0.0000.756f0.000
Ang I0.674b0.000--0.653f0.000
Ang II0.756b0.0000.653d0.000--

引文著录: 罗晓英, 曾峥. 血浆肾素-血管紧张素系统与非酒精性脂肪肝病的相关性. 世界华人消化杂志 2013; 21(36): 4158-4163