BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Darwish AM, Kamel MA, Zahran K, Aboulela M. Office Cervicoscopy versus Stationary Colposcopy in Suspicious Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Midlife Health 2019;10:115-22. [PMID: 31579194 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_135_18] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 . Retraction: Office Cervicoscopy versus Stationary Colposcopy in Suspicious Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Midlife Health 2020;11:264. [PMID: 33767570 DOI: 10.4103/0976-7800.307580] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Li Q, Zhang HW, Sui L, Hua KQ. Diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopy and vaginoscopy: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(21): 5943-5947 [PMID: 34368312 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5943] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Li X, Liu M, Ji Y, Qu P. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2021;21:241. [PMID: 33975589 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01238-8] [Reference Citation Analysis]