BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Morant JJ, Salvadó M, Hernández-Girón I, Casanovas R, Ortega R, Calzado A. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:92555893. [PMID: 22933532 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/92555893] [Cited by in Crossref: 50] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Batista WO, Soares MR, de Oliveira MV, Maia AF, Caldas LV. Assessment of protocols in cone-beam CT with symmetric and asymmetric beams usingeffective dose and air kerma-area product. Appl Radiat Isot 2015;100:16-20. [PMID: 25620114 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.01.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Yao XS, Yan D, Jiang XX, Li X, Zeng HY, Li H. Short-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using cone-beam computed tomography for planning and image guidance. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(7): 1580-1591 [PMID: 33728301 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i7.1580] [Cited by in CrossRef: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos Kde F, Neves FS, Melo SL, Campos PS, Haiter-Neto F. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computerized tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:121-127. [PMID: 23217543 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Rottke D, Patzelt S, Poxleitner P, Schulze D. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120417. [PMID: 23584925 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120417] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Soares MR, Santos WS, Neves LP, Perini AP, Batista WO, Maia AF, Belinato W, Caldas LV. The use of personal protection equipment for the absorbed doses of eye lens and thyroid gland in CBCT exams using Monte Carlo. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2020;167:108347. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108347] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Reidelbach CS, Neubauer J, Russe MF, Kusterer J, Semper-Hogg W. Evaluation of skin doses for cone-beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial imaging: A preclinical study. PLoS One 2021;16:e0254510. [PMID: 34252156 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254510] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Ernst M, Manser P, Dula K, Volken W, Stampanoni MF, Fix MK. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of head and neck organ and effective doses for cone beam computed tomography using 3D Accuitomo 170. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20170047. [PMID: 28749697 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170047] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Pauwels R, Scarfe WC. Radiation Dose, Risks, and Protection in CBCT. In: Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, editors. Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 227-46. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62061-9_8] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Soares MR, Batista WO, de Lara Antonio P, Caldas LV, Maia AF. Effective dose comparison between stitched and single FOV in CBCT protocols for complete dental arcade. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2015;110:72-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.01.019] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Soares MR, Santos WS, Neves LP, Perini AP, Batista WO, Belinato W, Maia AF, Caldas LV. Dose estimate for cone beam CT equipment protocols using Monte Carlo simulation in computational adult anthropomorphic phantoms. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2019;155:252-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.06.038] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Benchimol D, Koivisto J, Kadesjö N, Shi XQ. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018;47:20180007. [PMID: 29722543 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180007] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Salvadó M, Cros M, Joemai R, Calzado A, Geleijns J. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose distribution of ICRP adult reference computational phantoms for acquisitions with a 320 detector-row cone-beam CT scanner. Physica Medica 2015;31:452-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.007] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, Scheske MJ. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140197. [PMID: 25224586 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140197] [Cited by in Crossref: 221] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 148] [Article Influence: 31.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: A review. Phys Med 2015;31:844-60. [PMID: 26481816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Stratis A, Zhang G, Lopez-rendon X, Politis C, Hermans R, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Shaheen E, Bosmans H. Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners. Physica Medica 2017;41:71-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.027] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Marchant TE, Joshi KD. Comprehensive Monte Carlo study of patient doses from cone-beam CT imaging in radiotherapy. J Radiol Prot 2017;37:13-30. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/13] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Nardi C, Talamonti C, Pallotta S, Saletti P, Calistri L, Cordopatri C, Colagrande S. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20170030. [PMID: 28511564 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170030] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Cros M, Hernandez-giron I, Calzado A, Dewey M, Salvado M. A Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of patient dose in rest and stress cardiac computed tomography with a 320-detector row CT scanner. Physica Medica 2015;31:1029-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Lee H, Badal A, Costa ALF. A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010–2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator. Radiology Research and Practice 2021;2021:1-18. [DOI: 10.1155/2021/6924314] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Lee C, Yoon J, Han SS, Na JY, Lee JH, Kim YH, Hwang JJ. Dose assessment in dental cone-beam computed tomography: Comparison of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry with Monte Carlo method. PLoS One 2020;15:e0219103. [PMID: 32231373 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219103] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Rehani M, Gupta R, Bartling S, Sharp G, Pauwels R, Berris T, Boone J. ICRP Publication 129: Radiological Protection in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Ann ICRP 2015;44:7-127. [DOI: 10.1177/0146645315575485] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Kuo YF, Chen MH, Huang KH, Chang HH, Yeh CL, Lin CP. Comparing image qualities of dental cone-beam computed tomography with different scanning parameters for detecting root canals. J Formos Med Assoc 2021;120:991-6. [PMID: 32900578 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.08.038] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Baptista M, Di Maria S, Vieira S, Santos J, Pereira J, Pereira M, Vaz P. Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures. Radiat Environ Biophys 2019;58:21-37. [PMID: 30392077 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0760-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140224. [PMID: 25263643 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140224] [Cited by in Crossref: 151] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 101] [Article Influence: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Abuhaimed A, Martin CJ, Sankaralingam M. A Monte Carlo study of organ and effective doses of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in radiotherapy. J Radiol Prot 2018;38:61-80. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa8f61] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Kim J, Yun J, Kim S, Kim H. Absorbed dose and noise in intensity-modulated dental computed tomography. J Inst 2018;13:C12011-C12011. [DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/12/c12011] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Finn SC, Silver MT, Canary B, Kantarci A, Allareddy V, Katebi N, Masoud MI. A modified Steiner's analysis that does not require radiographic exposure of the cranial base. Orthod Craniofac Res 2019;22:1-8. [PMID: 30365248 DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12250] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 El Sahili N, David-Tchouda S, Thoret S, Nasseh I, Berberi A, Fortin T. Effect of Milliamperage Reduction on Pre-surgical Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Surgeons of Varying Experience. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2018;17:520-30. [PMID: 30344396 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-017-1075-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 da Silva Moura W, Chiqueto K, Pithon GM, Neves LS, Castro R, Henriques JFC. Factors influencing the effective dose associated with CBCT: a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest 2019;23:1319-30. [DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2561-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Martin CJ, Abuhaimed A, Sankaralingam M, Metwaly M, Gentle DJ. Organ doses can be estimated from the computed tomography (CT) dose index for cone-beam CT on radiotherapy equipment. J Radiol Prot 2016;36:215-29. [DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/215] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Kelaranta A, Ekholm M, Toroi P, Kortesniemi M. Radiation exposure to foetus and breasts from dental X-ray examinations: effect of lead shields. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20150095. [PMID: 26313308 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150095] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Tsapaki V. Radiation protection in dental radiology – Recent advances and future directions. Physica Medica 2017;44:222-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.018] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Pauwels R, Zhang G, Theodorakou C, Walker A, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation. Br J Radiol 2014;87:20130654. [PMID: 25189417 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130654] [Cited by in Crossref: 51] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Mah E, Ritenour ER, Yao H. A review of dental cone-beam CT dose conversion coefficients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021;50:20200225. [PMID: 33112658 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20200225] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Stratis A, Zhang G, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H. Rotating and translating anthropomorphic head voxel models to establish an horizontal Frankfort plane for dental CBCT Monte Carlo simulations: a dose comparison study. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:N681-96. [PMID: 27893451 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/N681] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Yuan H, Li X, Tian X, Ji K, Liu F. Comparison of Angio-CT and cone-beam CT-guided immediate radiofrequency ablation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020;45:2585-92. [PMID: 32107583 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02462-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Tadinada A, Schneider S, Yadav S. Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of two cone beam computed tomography protocols in reliably detecting the location of the inferior alveolar nerve canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20160389. [PMID: 28128638 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160389] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Dach E, Bergauer B, Seidel A, von Wilmowsky C, Adler W, Lell M, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Impact of voxel size and scan time on the accuracy of three-dimensional radiological imaging data from cone-beam computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:2190-6. [PMID: 30318325 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Kanzaki T, Takahashi Y, Yarita K. Absorbed dose to the eye lens during dental radiography. Oral Radiol 2017;33:246-50. [DOI: 10.1007/s11282-016-0267-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Mehdizadeh M, Bagherieh S. Evaluation of Relationship between Exposure Parameters and Maxillofacial Bone Quality with Salivary Glands Absorbed Dose in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2018;19:568-73. [DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2300] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Kralik I, Faj D, Lauc T, Škarica M, Popić J, Brkic H. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations. J Radiol Prot 2018;38:1412-27. [PMID: 30264736 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aae4e8] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Velasco-Torres M, Padial-Molina M, Alarcón JA, OʼValle F, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P. Maxillary Sinus Dimensions With Respect to the Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery Decrease With Tooth Loss. Implant Dent 2016;25:464-70. [PMID: 27455429 DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000445] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Wenzel A. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in approximal surfaces: Advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced modalities. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:251-64. [PMID: 24512205 DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2014.888757] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Ghaedizirgar M, Faghihi R, Paydar R, Sina S. EFFECTIVE DOSE IN TWO DIFFERENT DENTAL CBCT SYSTEMS: NEWTOM VGi AND PLANMECA 3D MID. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2017;176:287-93. [DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx008] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Huda W, Tipnis SV. DOSES METRICS AND PATIENT AGE IN CT. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. [DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv310] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Alaei P, Spezi E. Imaging dose from cone beam computed tomography in radiation therapy. Phys Med 2015;31:647-58. [PMID: 26148865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.06.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 73] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55] [Article Influence: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Soares MR, Batista WO, Antonio Pde L, Caldas LV, Maia AF. Study of effective dose of various protocols in equipment cone beam CT. Appl Radiat Isot 2015;100:21-6. [PMID: 25665897 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.01.012] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]