BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Hwang YS, Tsai HY, Lin YY, Lui KW. Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation. BMC Med Imaging 2018;18:2. [PMID: 29402236 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-018-0247-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Mandelka E, Gierse J, Gruetzner PA, Franke J, Vetter SY. First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement. Medicina 2022;58:1111. [DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081111] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Alizadeh LS, Koch V, Vogl TJ, Yel I, Gruenewald L, Albrecht MH, Herrmann E, von Knebel-Doeberitz PL, Booz C. Value of Latest-generation Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Post Lipiodol-embolization Imaging in Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolization in Comparison with Multi-detector Computed Tomography. Acad Radiol 2022;29:e109-18. [PMID: 34598867 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.07.029] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Foster N, Shaffrey C, Buchholz A, Turner R, Yang LZ, Niedzwiecki D, Goode A. Image quality and Dose Comparison of Three Mobile Intraoperative 3D imaging Systems in Spine Surgery. World Neurosurg 2021:S1878-8750(21)01948-3. [PMID: 34979287 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.103] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Greffier J, Hamard A, Berny L, Snene F, Perolat R, Larbi A, Viala P, Dabli D, Beregi JP. A retrospective comparison of organ dose and effective dose in percutaneous vertebroplasty performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm with a flat-panel detector. Phys Med 2021;88:235-41. [PMID: 34311161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.002] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Bürckenmeyer F, Diamantis I, Kriechenbauer T, Lehmann T, Franiel T, Malouhi A, Grimm MO, Teichgräber U, Aschenbach R. Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021;44:1089-94. [PMID: 33660064 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02787-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Gupta S, Martinson JR, Ricaurte D, Scalea TM, Morrison JJ. Cone-beam computed tomography for trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020;89:e34-40. [PMID: 32345901 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002748] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Yuasa Y, Shiinoki T, Onizuka R, Fujimoto K. Estimation of effective imaging dose and excess absolute risk of secondary cancer incidence for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography acquisition. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019;20:57-68. [PMID: 31593377 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12741] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Piron L, Le Roy J, Cassinotto C, Delicque J, Belgour A, Allimant C, Beregi JP, Greffier J, Molinari N, Guiu B. Radiation Exposure During Transarterial Chemoembolization: Angio-CT Versus Cone-Beam CT. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019;42:1609-18. [PMID: 31222382 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02269-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]