BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I, Yamagishi M, Watanabe A, Abe T, Kobayashi I. Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology. 2009;250:545-550. [PMID: 19188322 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2502080695] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Jiao D, Li Z, Li Z, Shui S, Han XW. Flat detector cone beam CT-guided nephrostomy using virtual navigation in patients with iatrogenic ureteral injury. Radiol Med 2017;122:557-63. [PMID: 28332142 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0751-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Rhee R, Oderich G, Hertault A, Tenorio E, Shih M, Honari S, Jacob T, Haulon S. Multicenter experience in translumbar type II endoleak treatment in the hybrid room with needle trajectory planning and fusion guidance. J Vasc Surg 2020;72:1043-9. [PMID: 31882316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.076] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Steuwe A, Geisbüsch P, Schulz CJ, Böckler D, Kauczor H, Stiller W. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs. J Endovasc Ther 2016;23:583-92. [DOI: 10.1177/1526602816649588] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Dijkstra ML, Eagleton MJ, Greenberg RK, Mastracci T, Hernandez A. Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2011;53:583-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.039] [Cited by in Crossref: 126] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92] [Article Influence: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Yao XS, Yan D, Jiang XX, Li X, Zeng HY, Li H. Short-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using cone-beam computed tomography for planning and image guidance. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(7): 1580-1591 [PMID: 33728301 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i7.1580] [Cited by in CrossRef: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Hertault A, Maurel B, Sobocinski J, Martin Gonzalez T, Le Roux M, Azzaoui R, Midulla M, Haulon S. Impact of Hybrid Rooms with Image Fusion on Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Aortic Repair. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2014;48:382-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.05.026] [Cited by in Crossref: 109] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75] [Article Influence: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Bürckenmeyer F, Diamantis I, Kriechenbauer T, Lehmann T, Franiel T, Malouhi A, Grimm MO, Teichgräber U, Aschenbach R. Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021;44:1089-94. [PMID: 33660064 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02787-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Hertault A, Maurel B, Midulla M, Bordier C, Desponds L, Saeed Kilani M, Sobocinski J, Haulon S. Editor's Choice – Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures: Basic Knowledge, Literature Review, and Reporting Standards. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2015;50:21-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Piron L, Le Roy J, Cassinotto C, Delicque J, Belgour A, Allimant C, Beregi JP, Greffier J, Molinari N, Guiu B. Radiation Exposure During Transarterial Chemoembolization: Angio-CT Versus Cone-Beam CT. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019;42:1609-18. [PMID: 31222382 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02269-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Paul J, Mbalisike EC, Vogl TJ. Radiation dose to procedural personnel and patients from an X-ray volume imaging system. Eur Radiol 2013;23:3262-70. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2939-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Yamada R, Bassaco B, Dufour L, Collins H, Anderson MB, Hannegan C, Guimaraes M. Safety and Efficacy of Combined Transarterial Embolization and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver Tumors Using Cone-Beam CT and Needle Navigation Software in a Single Session. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2019;30:390-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.11.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Varghese A, Keshava SN, Moses V, Koshy G, Mammen S, Ahmed M, Livingstone RS. Radiation dose reference card for interventional radiology procedures: Experience in a tertiary referral centre. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2019;29:247-52. [PMID: 31741591 DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_35_19] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Tselikas L, Joskin J, Roquet F, Farouil G, Dreuil S, Hakimé A, Teriitehau C, Auperin A, de Baere T, Deschamps F. Percutaneous Bone Biopsies: Comparison between Flat-Panel Cone-Beam CT and CT-Scan Guidance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;Epub ahead of print. [PMID: 24627161 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-014-0870-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP. Real-Time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W445-51. [PMID: 20410392 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3647] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Tyan YS, Li YY, Ku MC, Huang HH, Chen TR. The effective dose assessment of C-arm CT in hepatic arterial embolisation therapy. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20120551. [PMID: 23403454 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120551] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Jiao D, Zhang Z, Sun Z, Wang Y, Han X. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: C-arm CT with 3D virtual navigation in non-dilated renal collecting systems. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018;24:17-22. [PMID: 29256866 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2017.17079] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Guggenberger R, Fischer MA, Hodler J, Pfammatter T, Andreisek G. Flat-Panel CT Arthrography: Feasibility Study and Comparison to Multidetector CT Arthrography. Investigative Radiology 2012;47:312-8. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3182419082] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Wiesinger B, Stütz A, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J. Comparison of Digital Flat-Panel Detector and Conventional Angiography Machines: Evaluation of Stent Detection Rates, Visibility Scores, and Dose-Area Products. American Journal of Roentgenology 2012;198:946-54. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.7245] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Ben-shlomo A, Cohen D, Bruckheimer E, Bachar GN, Konstantinovsky R, Birk E, Atar E. Comparing Effective Doses During Image-Guided Core Needle Biopsies with Computed Tomography Versus C-Arm Cone Beam CT Using Adult and Pediatric Phantoms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016;39:732-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1227-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Spira D, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Ketelsen D, Wiskirchen J, Wiesinger B. Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector. Acta Radiol 2016;57:587-94. [PMID: 26231951 DOI: 10.1177/0284185115597262] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Sandri GA, Ozbek P, Kärkkäinen JM, Vrtiska T, Macedo TA, Gloviczki P. Prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate cone beam computed tomography for technical assessment of standard and complex endovascular aortic repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2020;71:1982-1993.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.080] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Suzuki S, Yamaguchi I, Kidouchi T, Yamamoto A, Masumoto T, Ozaki Y. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:376-382. [PMID: 20495804 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9893-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Ockert S, Heinrich M, Kaufmann T, Syburra T, Lopez R, Seelos R. Endovascular aortic sealing with Nellix reduces intraoperative radiation dose when compared to endovascular aortic repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2018;67:1068-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.126] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Schulz B, Heidenreich R, Heidenreich M, Eichler K, Thalhammer A, Naeem NNN, Vogl TJ, Zangos S. Radiation exposure to operating staff during rotational flat-panel angiography and C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CT) applications. European Journal of Radiology 2012;81:4138-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, van Es HW, Nievelstein RA, van Heesewijk JP. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22:455-61. [PMID: 21463755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.011] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Organ doses and normalized organ doses for various age groups in ultralow dose pediatric C-arm cone-beam CT. Eur Radiol 2022. [PMID: 35364713 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08767-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Hertault A, Maurel B, Pontana F, Martin-gonzalez T, Spear R, Sobocinski J, Sediri I, Gautier C, Azzaoui R, Rémy-jardin M, Haulon S. Benefits of Completion 3D Angiography Associated with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Technical Success after EVAR. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2015;49:541-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Seierstad T, Friberg EG, Lervag C, Widmark A, Wilhelmsen N, Stranden E. Radiation doses to Norwegian heart-transplanted patients undergoing annual coronary angiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2012;149:403-9. [DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr311] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Braak SJ, van Melick HH, Onaca MG, van Heesewijk JP, van Strijen MJ. 3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy--results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2547-2552. [PMID: 22660984 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2498-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Hwang YS, Tsai HY, Lin YY, Lui KW. Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation. BMC Med Imaging 2018;18:2. [PMID: 29402236 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-018-0247-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]