BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Gannon F. The essential role of peer review. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:743. [PMID: 11559578 DOI: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve188] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Stephen D. Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts. Scientometrics. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04357-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Vest TA, Bell CM, Adelman M, Musch KLE, Latiolais CA, Martin CY, Whalen KM. Supplying the pipeline of peer review: A call to engage new practitioners. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022:zxac005. [PMID: 35022676 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac005] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Nunes GS, Adami SL, Pellenz MM, Rigo D, Estivalet RA, Diel AP, Benincá IL, Haupenthal A. Toward scientific dissemination of undergraduate thesis in physical therapy programs – a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2022;22. [DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03087-8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Thomassen TMJA, Van der Weijden FGA, Slot DE. The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg 2021. [PMID: 34877772 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12563] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Faggion CM Jr. Peer review blinding practices of highly ranked dental journals: analysis and discussion. Br Dent J 2021. [PMID: 34446840 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3319-y] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Emile SH. Interactive platform for peer review: A proposal to improve the current peer review system. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(6): 1247-1250 [PMID: 33644191 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1247] [Cited by in CrossRef: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Dhillon P. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts. FEBS J 2021;288:2750-6. [DOI: 10.1111/febs.15705] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Habig B. Practical Rubrics for Informal Science Education Studies: (1) a STEM Research Design Rubric for Assessing Study Design and a (2) STEM Impact Rubric for Measuring Evidence of Impact. Front Educ 2020;5:554806. [DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.554806] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Herber OR, Bradbury-Jones C, Böling S, Combes S, Hirt J, Koop Y, Nyhagen R, Veldhuizen JD, Taylor J. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020;20:122. [PMID: 32423388 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01005-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Kerr ZY, Chandran A, Zuckerman SL, Stoner L, Solomon GS. Research is like a bad game of 'telephone': mitigating the information breakdown from clinicians and researchers to the general public. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:762-4. [PMID: 31776121 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101364] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Gundogan B, Agha RA. Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it? IJS Oncology 2021;3:56. [DOI: 10.1097/ij9.0000000000000056] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Kovanis M, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Trinquart L. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data. Scientometrics 2016;106:695-715. [PMID: 26855456 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1800-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Sen CK. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors? Antioxid Redox Signal 2012;16:293-6. [PMID: 22098370 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2011.4424] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Lipworth W, Kerridge IH, Carter SM, Little M. Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process. Bioethical Inquiry 2011;8:267-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s11673-011-9312-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Lipworth W, Kerridge I. Shifting Power Relations and the Ethics of Journal Peer Review. Social Epistemology 2011;25:97-121. [DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2010.534567] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Casadevall A, Fang FC. Is peer review censorship? Infect Immun 2009;77:1273-4. [PMID: 19223484 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00018-09] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 [DOI: 10.1101/276907] [Cited by in Crossref: 49] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis]