BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Gropp RE, Glisson S, Gallo S, Thompson L. Peer Review: A System under Stress. BioScience 2017;67:407-10. [DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix034] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Seghier ML. Demystifying desk rejection: A call to action for our authors. Int J Imaging Syst Tech. [DOI: 10.1002/ima.22733] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Kaltenbrunner W, Birch K, Amuchastegui M. Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals. Science, Technology, & Human Values. [DOI: 10.1177/01622439211068798] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Khomyakov M. Should science be evaluated? Social Science Information 2021;60:308-17. [DOI: 10.1177/05390184211022101] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Erosheva EA, Martinková P, Lee CJ. When zero may not be zero: A cautionary note on the use of inter‐rater reliability in evaluating grant peer review. J R Stat Soc A 2021;184:904-19. [DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12681] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Emile SH. Interactive platform for peer review: A proposal to improve the current peer review system. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(6): 1247-1250 [PMID: 33644191 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1247] [Cited by in CrossRef: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Rishniw M. Do case reports warrant peer review? A critical analysis. Vet J 2020;262:105517. [PMID: 32792092 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105517] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Church KW. Emerging trends: Reviewing the reviewers (again). Nat Lang Eng 2020;26:245-57. [DOI: 10.1017/s1351324920000030] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Sizo A, Lino A, Reis LP, Rocha Á. An overview of assessing the quality of peer review reports of scientific articles. International Journal of Information Management 2019;46:286-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]