Primary and metastatic brain tumors have a poor prognosis, partly owing to the unique characteristics of the central nervous system (CNS) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). One distinct feature of the CNS TIME is the limited infiltration and activation of dendritic cells (DCs). The impact of CNS versus non-CNS TIME can be assessed by injecting tumor cells from the same model, either subcutaneously (peripherally) or into the brain. Subcutaneous tumors drain into the tumor-draining lymph nodes in the skin (TdLN-p), whereas brain tumors drain into the deep cervical TdLN (TdLN-c). We previously showed that CNS tumors that are not responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition become responsive when grown peripherally, and that non-responsiveness correlates with a tolerogenic immune response in the local TIME and TdLN-c.

In this study, we investigated the immunoregulatory potential of cervical DCs (DC-c) compared with that of peripheral DCs (DC-p) using high-resolution flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and ex vivo and in vivo functional characterization of TdLNs from mouse models of glioma and lymphoma.

Our analysis revealed that DC-c promoted regulatory T-cell expansion and poorly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells compared with DC-p. Furthermore, we identified OX40 (Tnfrsf4) as a modulator of immunoregulatory DC-c function and found that its antitumor effect depended on lymphocyte trafficking and the DC transcription factor Batf3. CCR7+OX40+ DCs were efficient in antigen processing and presentation, and OX40 agonists further enhanced DC activation. In TIME, the CCR7+OX40+ DCs expressed OX40L, and blocking it promoted Treg formation ex vivo.

Our findings highlight the unique immunoregulatory functions of DC-c in TdLNs and suggest the importance of OX40 signaling through direct effects on CCR7+OX40+ DCs and indirect effects on T cells.

This multi-institutional, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cellm-001, an autologous formalin-fixed brain tumor immunostimulant, for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with gross total resection to prolong overall survival (OS) and prevent recurrence after surgery. One hundred twelve patients are to be randomized 1:1 to either Cellm-001 with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or saline solution with standard CRT. Randomization is based on the following stratified randomization criteria: age, Karnofsky Performance Status, and the presence or absence of photodynamic therapy (PDT). The primary endpoint is OS and secondary outcomes are progression-free survival (PFS), OS and PFS with and without radiographically residual lesions as subgroups, OS and PFS with and without PDT, p53-negative OS and PFS, high Cluster of Differentiation-8 score OS and PFS, OS associated with death in primary disease, and 24-month OS and PFS rates. All institutions received ethical committee approval and patient enrollment began in 2021.

Given the growing interest in immunotherapy (IMT), we developed an autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) manufactured from the patient's own glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tissue in paraffin-embedded blocks made from the resected tumor and a double-blind, randomized phase IIB trial of AFTV with temozolomide in newly diagnosed GBM was conducted. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for patients with gross total resection (GTR) on imaging tended toward improvement: 81% in the AFTV group versus 46% in the placebo group (P = .067). Based on these IIB results, the feasibility of conducting a phase III trial was confirmed for IIB-eligible patients with total resection. We here plan to conduct the world's first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial using Cellm-001 to demonstrate autologous tumor immunostimulant efficacy. This IMT, in combination with sub-analyses (GTR, P53 status, CD8 score, and other factors) to be validated, is expected to be a breakthrough in effective standards of care for the treatment of GBM.

Registry number: jRCT2031200153; Date of Registration: 20 /October, /2020; Date of First Patient Enrollment: 14 /January/, 2021.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections that last a long time are a significant public health problem worldwide. About 254 million people around the world are chronically sick with HBV. Each year, 1.2 million new cases occur, and in 2022, 1.1 million people will die from the disease. So, it has been essential to work on finding ways to treat and avoid HBV. The process of therapeutic vaccination involves giving people a non-infectious form of a virus to start or improve immune reactions specific to HBV. This helps keep HBV infections under control. Dendritic cells (DCs) play a significant part in beginning the adaptive immune response, which could decide how well an HBV infection is treated. DC-based treatment has been looked into for people with chronic HBV (CHB) infection and has shown some sound effects. Vaccines for CHB that use DCs boost antiviral immunity by improving T cells and breaking the immune system's resistance against HBV. In these vaccines, DCs are loaded with HBV antigens (like HBsAg, HBcAg, or peptides) outside of the body and then put back into the patient to make the immune system work better. In conclusion, this DC treatment is a biological therapy method with a good chance of being used. This study examined the different DC-based medicines that can treat and prevent HBV. Finally, we've talked about clinical studies, the current problems, how to fix them, and the future of this vaccine for treating and preventing HBV.

Cancer-related deaths continue to rise, largely due to the suboptimal efficacy of current treatments. Fortunately, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative, offering new hope for cancer patients. Among various immunotherapy approaches, targeting tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) has gained particular attention due to its demonstrated success in clinical settings. Despite these advancements, there are still gaps in our understanding of TSAs. Therefore, this review explores the life cycle of TSAs in cancer, the methods used to identify them, and recent advances in TSAs-targeted cancer therapies. Enhancing medical professionals' understanding of TSAs will help facilitate the development of more effective TSAs-based cancer treatments.

In recent years, increasing evidence has suggested that meningeal lymphatic drainage plays a significant role in central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Studies have indicated that CNS diseases and conditions associated with meningeal lymphatic drainage dysfunction include neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, infections, traumatic brain injury, tumors, functional cranial disorders, and hydrocephalus. However, the understanding of the regulatory and damage mechanisms of meningeal lymphatics under physiological and pathological conditions is currently limited. Given the importance of a profound understanding of the interplay between meningeal lymphatic drainage and CNS diseases, this review covers seven key aspects: the development and structure of meningeal lymphatic vessels, methods for observing meningeal lymphatics, the function of meningeal lymphatics, the molecular mechanisms of meningeal lymphatic injury, the relationships between meningeal lymphatic vessels and CNS diseases, potential regulatory mechanisms of meningeal lymphatics, and conclusions and outstanding questions. We will explore the relationship between the development, structure, and function of meningeal lymphatics, review current methods for observing meningeal lymphatic vessels in both animal models and humans, and identify unresolved key points in meningeal lymphatic research. The aim of this review is to provide new directions for future research and therapeutic strategies targeting meningeal lymphatics by critically analyzing recent advancements in the field, identifying gaps in current knowledge, and proposing innovative approaches to address these gaps.

Tumor vaccines have shown great promise for treating various malignancies; however, glioblastoma (GBM), characterized by its immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, high heterogeneity, and limited accessibility, has achieved only modest clinical benefits. Here, it is reported that GBM cell lysate nanovaccines boosted with TLR9 agonist CpG ODN (GlioVac) via a strategic vaccination regimen achieve complete regression of malignant murine GBM tumors. Subcutaneous administration of GlioVac promotes uptake by cervical lymph nodes and antigen presentation cells, bolstering antigen cross-presentation and infiltration of GBM-specific CD8+ T cells into the tumor. Notably, a regimen involving two subcutaneous and three intravenous vaccinations not only activates systemic anti-GBM immunity but also further enhances the tumor infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, effectively reshaping the "cold" GBM tumor into a "hot" tumor. This approach led to a state of tumor-free survival in 5 out of 7 mice bearing the established GL261 GBM model with complete protection from tumor rechallenge. In an orthotopic hRas-GBM model induced by a lentiviral plasmid, GlioVac resulted in ≈100% complete tumor regression. These findings suggest that GlioVac provides a personalized therapeutic vaccine strategy for glioblastoma.

Dendritic cell-based therapeutic tumor vaccines are an active immunotherapy that has been commonly tried in the clinic,traditional treatment modalities for malignant tumors, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, have the disadvantages of high recurrence rates and side effects. The dendritic cell vaccination destroys cells from tumors by means of the patient's own system of immunity, a very promising treatment. However, due to the suppression of the tumor immune microenvironment, the difficulty of screening for optimal specific antigens, and the high technical difficulty of vaccine production. Most tumor vaccines currently available in the clinic have failed to produce significant clinical therapeutic effects. In this review, the fundamentals of therapeutic dendritic cells vaccine therapy are briefly outlined, with a focus on the progress of therapeutic Dendritic cells vaccine research in the clinic and the initiatives undertaken to enhance dendritic cell vaccinations' anti-tumor effectiveness. It is believed that through the continuous exploration of novel therapeutic strategies, therapeutic dendritic cells vaccines can play a greater role in improving tumor treatment for tumor patients.

Immunotherapy has transformed the landscape of cancer treatment, with T cell-based strategies at the forefront of this revolution. However, the durability of these responses is frequently undermined by two intertwined phenomena: T cell exhaustion and senescence. While exhaustion is driven by chronic antigen exposure in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, leading to a reversible state of diminished functionality, senescence reflects a more permanent, age- or stress-induced arrest in cellular proliferation and effector capacity. Together, these processes represent formidable barriers to sustained anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we dissect the molecular underpinnings of T cell exhaustion and senescence, revealing how these dysfunctions synergistically contribute to immune evasion and resistance across a range of solid tumors. We explore cutting-edge therapeutic approaches aimed at rewiring the exhausted and senescent T cell phenotypes. These include advances in immune checkpoint blockade, the engineering of "armored" CAR-T cells, senolytic therapies that selectively eliminate senescent cells, and novel interventions that reinvigorate the immune system's capacity for tumor eradication. By spotlighting emerging strategies that target both exhaustion and senescence, we provide a forward-looking perspective on the potential to harness immune rejuvenation. This comprehensive review outlines the next frontier in cancer immunotherapy: unlocking durable responses by overcoming the immune system's intrinsic aging and exhaustion, ultimately paving the way for transformative therapeutic breakthroughs.

Cancer immunotherapy has transformed oncology by harnessing the immune system to specifically target cancer cells, offering reduced systemic toxicity compared to traditional therapies. This review highlights key strategies, including adoptive cell transfer (ACT), immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viral (OV) therapy, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and mRNA-based vaccines. ACT reinfuses enhanced immune cells like tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to combat refractory cancers, while checkpoint inhibitors (eg, PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers) restore T-cell activity. OV therapy uses engineered viruses (eg, T-VEC) to selectively lyse cancer cells, and advanced mAbs improve targeting precision. mRNA vaccines introduce tumor-specific antigens to trigger robust immune responses. Despite significant progress, challenges like immune-related side effects, high costs, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments persist. This review underscores the need for combination strategies and precision medicine to overcome these barriers and maximize the potential of immunotherapy in personalized cancer treatment.

This study investigates the therapeutic potential of bone marrow macrophages-derived dendritic cells (BMΦDCs) in enhancing antitumor immunity against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), focusing on their effects in inhibiting tumor growth, reducing metastasis, and modulating the tumor microenvironment.

BMΦDCs were generated by culturing bone marrow cells with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) followed by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). MTCQ-1 tumor lysates were used for antigen loading. The phenotypic characteristics of BMΦDCs were analyzed using flow cytometry. In vivo antitumor efficacy was assessed in subcutaneous and lung metastasis models in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. Tumor growth was monitored, and tumor tissues were collected for histological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, and anti-CD8 staining.

BMΦDCs displayed higher maturation marker expression (CD40, CD86) compared to traditional BMDCs. In the subcutaneous tumor model, BMΦDCs significantly inhibited tumor growth and enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity. In the lung metastasis model, BMΦDCs effectively reduced metastatic burden. Histological analysis revealed increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and reduced tumor fibrosis in BMΦDC-treated mice. No significant toxicity or organ damage was observed.

BMΦDCs are a promising immunotherapeutic approach for HNSCC, demonstrating superior antitumor efficacy, enhanced immune responses, and excellent biosafety. These findings highlight the potential of BMΦDCs in advancing cancer immunotherapy.

Treatment resistance in glioblastoma (GBM) is largely driven by the extensive multi-level heterogeneity that typifies this disease. Despite significant progress toward elucidating GBM's genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity, a critical knowledge gap remains in defining this heterogeneity at the spatial level. To address this, we employed spatial transcriptomics to map the architecture of the GBM ecosystem. This revealed tumor cell states that are jointly defined by gene expression and spatial localization, and multicellular niches whose composition varies along the tumor core-edge axis. Ligand-receptor interaction analysis uncovered a complex network of intercellular communication, including niche- and region-specific interactions. Finally, we found that CD8 positive GZMK positive T cells colocalize with LYVE1 positive CD163 positive myeloid cells in vascular regions, suggesting a potential mechanism for immune evasion. These findings provide novel insights into the GBM tumor microenvironment, highlighting previously unrecognized patterns of spatial organization and intercellular interactions, and novel therapeutic avenues to disrupt tumor-promoting interactions and overcome immune resistance.

Drug repurposing is an attractive route for finding new therapeutics for brain cancers such as glioblastoma. Local administration of drugs to brain tumors or the postsurgical resection cavity holds promise to deliver a high dose to the target site with minimal off-target effects. Drug delivery systems aim to sustain the release of the drug at the target site but typically exhibit drawbacks such as a poor safety profile, uncontrolled/rapid drug release, or poor control over synthesis parameters/material dimensions. Herein, we analyzed the antidepressant vortioxetine and showed in vitro that it causes a greater loss of viability in glioblastoma cells than it does to normal primary human astrocytes. We developed a new droplet microfluidic-based emulsion method to reproducibly produce vortioxetine-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres with tight size control (36.80 ± 1.96 μm). The drug loading efficiency was around 90% when 9.1% (w/w) drug was loaded into the microspheres, and drug release could be sustained for three to 4 weeks. The vortioxetine microspheres showed robust antiglioblastoma efficacy in both 2D monolayer and 3D spheroid patient-derived glioblastoma cells, highlighting the potential of combining an antidepressant with sustained local delivery as a new therapeutic strategy.

Astrocytoma grade 4 without isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-based characterisation has been called glioblastoma (GBM) in historical cohorts. There have been significant advancements in diagnostic radiology and pathology, and in the technical aspects of surgery, radiation therapy, and temozolomide (TMZ) used for treatment of this disease. We analysed the outcomes of 267 adult astrocytoma grade 4/GBM patients, consecutively treated between December 2010 and November 2018 using modern techniques at our institute.

All patients underwent surgical resection, histopathology review, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation testing, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based radiation therapy using institute-specific target-delineation guidelines and image guidance, and TMZ according to Stupp protocol. Serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based follow-up ensured early detection of disease progression. Appropriate salvage therapy was determined based on clinicopathological attributes. Kaplan-Meier survival plots, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were performed on the prospectively recorded dataset to estimate survival and the factors affecting it.

At a median follow-up of 72 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year PFS, and 2-year PFS were 10 months, 37.8%, and 17.5%, respectively. MGMT-methylation, a radiation dose ≥54 Gy, and ≥4 adjuvant TMZ cycles were associated with favourable PFS. Median overall survival (OS), 2-year OS and 5-year OS were 24 months, 48%, and 18%, respectively. MGMT-methylation and 1-year disease control were associated with favourable OS. Salvage treatment could be offered to 69.2% patients, with use of all the three treatment modalities in 12.4%. Salvage reirradiation could be used in 30.8% patients. Haematological toxicity ≥grade 2 was evident in 6% patients during concurrent radiation-TMZ phase and in 9% patients in adjuvant TMZ phase. Postradiation neurocognitive deficits were noted in 20.1% patients, with onset at a median duration of 10 months.

Modern diagnostic and therapeutic techniques affected a near-doubling of survival and acceptable late toxicity, as compared to historical data.

Over the past few decades, cancer immunotherapy has experienced a significant revolution due to the advancements in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and adoptive cell therapies (ACTs), along with their regulatory approvals. In recent times, there has been hope in the effectiveness of cancer vaccines for therapy as they have been able to stimulate de novo T-cell reactions against tumor antigens. These tumor antigens include both tumor-associated antigen (TAA) and tumor-specific antigen (TSA). Nevertheless, the constant quest to fully achieve these abilities persists. Therefore, this review offers a broad perspective on the existing status of cancer immunizations. Cancer vaccine design has been revolutionized due to the advancements made in antigen selection, the development of antigen delivery systems, and a deeper understanding of the strategic intricacies involved in effective antigen presentation. In addition, this review addresses the present condition of clinical tests and deliberates on their approaches, with a particular emphasis on the immunogenicity specific to tumors and the evaluation of effectiveness against tumors. Nevertheless, the ongoing clinical endeavors to create cancer vaccines have failed to produce remarkable clinical results as a result of substantial obstacles, such as the suppression of the tumor immune microenvironment, the identification of suitable candidates, the assessment of immune responses, and the acceleration of vaccine production. Hence, there are possibilities for the industry to overcome challenges and enhance patient results in the coming years. This can be achieved by recognizing the intricate nature of clinical issues and continuously working toward surpassing existing limitations.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is recognized as the most lethal primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system. Although traditional treatments can somewhat prolong patient survival, the overall prognosis remains grim. Immunotherapy has become an effective method for GBM treatment. Oncolytic virus, checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T cells and tumor vaccines have all been applied in this field. Moreover, the combining of immunotherapy with traditional radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or gene therapy can further improve the treatment outcome. This review systematically summarizes the features of GBM, the recent progress of immunotherapy in overcoming GBM.

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive malignancy of the central nervous system. Despite two decades of intensive research since the establishment of the standard of care, emerging strategies have yet to produce consistent satisfactory outcomes. Because of its specific localisation and intricate characteristics, GB is a uniquely regulated solid tumour with a strong resistance to therapy. Advances in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), particularly with the introduction of a-emitting radionuclides, have unveiled potential avenues for the management of GB. Recent preclinical and clinical studies underscored promising advancements for targeted-α-therapy (TAT), but these therapeutic approaches exhibit a vast design heterogeneity, encompassing diverse radionuclides, vectors, target molecules, and administration modalities. This review seeks to critically assess the therapeutic landscape of GB through the perspective of TAT. Here, the focus is made on the advancements and limitations of in vivo explorations, pilot studies, and clinical trials, to determine the best directions for future investigations. In doing so, we hope to identify existing challenges and draw insights that might pave the way towards a more effective therapeutic approach.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by rapid growth, invasive infiltration into surrounding brain tissue, and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advancements in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, median survival remains approximately 15 months, underscoring the urgent need for innovative treatments. Key considerations informing treatment development include oncogenic genetic and epigenetic alterations that may dually serve as therapeutic targets and facilitate treatment resistance. Various immunotherapeutic strategies have been explored and continue to be refined for their anti-tumor potential. Technical aspects of drug delivery and blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration have been addressed through novel vehicles and techniques including the incorporation of nanotechnology. Molecular profiling has emerged as an important tool to individualize treatment where applicable, and to identify patient populations with the most drug sensitivity. The goal of this review is to describe the spectrum of potential GBM therapeutic targets, and to provide an overview of key trial outcomes. Altogether, the progress of clinical and preclinical work must be critically evaluated in order to develop therapies for GBM with the strongest therapeutic efficacy.

The brain environment is uniquely specialized to protect its neuronal tissue from excessive inflammation by tightly regulating adaptive immunity. However, in the context of brain cancer progression, this regulation can lead to a conflict between T cell activation and suppression. Here, we show that, while CD8+ T cells can infiltrate breast cancer-brain metastases, their anti-tumor cytotoxicity is locally suppressed in the brain. Conversely, CD8+ T cells exhibited tumoricidal activity in extracranial mammary lesions originating from the same cancer cells. Consequently, combined high-dose irradiation and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) therapy was effective in extracranial tumors but not intracranial lesions. Transcriptional analyses and functional studies identified neutrophils and Trem2-expressing macrophages as key sources for local T cell suppression within the brain, providing rational targets for future therapeutic strategies.

Immunotherapy has surfaced as a promising therapeutic modality for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive review of advancements, current status, and research trends in GC immunotherapy is essential to inform future investigative efforts.

To delineate the trends, advancements, and focal points in immunotherapy for GC.

We performed a bibliometric analysis of 2906 articles in English concerning GC immunotherapy published from 2000 to December 20, 2023, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. Data analysis and visualization were facilitated by CiteSpace (6.1.6R), VOSviewer v.1.6.17, and GraphPad Prism v8.0.2.

There has been an increase in the annual publication rate of GC immunotherapy research. China leads in publication volume, while the United States demonstrates the highest citation impact. Fudan University is notable for its citation frequency and publication output. Co-citation analysis and keyword frequency revealed and highlighted a focus on GC prognosis, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and integrative immunotherapy with targeted therapy. Emerging research areas include gastroesophageal junction cancer, adoptive immunotherapy, and the role of Treg cell in immunotherapy.

GC immunotherapy research is an expanding field attracting considerable scientific interest. With the clinical adoption of immunotherapy in GC, the primary goals are to enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Unlike hematological malignancies, GC's solid TME presents distinct immunological challenges that may attenuate the cytotoxic effects of immune cells on cancer cells. For instance, although CAR-T therapy is effective in hematological malignancies, it has underperformed in GC settings. Current research is centered on overcoming immunosuppression within the TME, with a focus on combinations of targeted therapy, adoptive immunotherapy, Treg cell dynamics, and precise prognosis prediction in immunotherapy. Additionally, immunotherapy's role in treating gastroesophageal junction cancer has become a novel research focus.

Glioblastoma, a grade IV astrocytoma, typically has a poor prognosis, with most patients succumbing within eighteen months of diagnosis and few experiencing long-term survival. Focused ultrasound, an emerging localized therapy, has shown promising results in early-phase studies for glioblastoma by improving the uptake of temozolomide and carboplatin. The blood-brain barrier is critical to homeostasis by regulating the movement of substances between the bloodstream and the central nervous system. While this barrier helps prevent infections from bloodborne pathogens, it also hinders the delivery of cancer therapies to gliomas. Combining focused ultrasound with circulating microbubbles enhances local blood-brain barrier permeability, facilitating the intratumoral uptake of systemic cancer therapies. The purpose of this study was to identify promising new therapeutics in the treatment of glioblastoma for localized drug delivery via focused ultrasound. This review provides an overview of the current standard of care for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, identifies current therapies indicated for the treatment, discusses key aspects of microbubble resonators, describes focused ultrasound devices under evaluation in human trials, and concludes with a perspective of emerging therapeutics for future studies.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is considered one of the most aggressive forms of brain cancer with a 15-month median survival, despite advancements in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment and the blood-brain barrier are major contributors to its poor prognosis and treatment resistance. In the last decade, significant progress has been made in developing cell-based vaccines to boost immune responses against GBM. This review provides an extensive update on recent clinical trials involving various cancer cell vaccines, including ICT-107, the α-type-1 DC vaccine, and others. Although these trials have demonstrated potential improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), the diverse and immune-suppressed nature of GBM poses challenges for consistent therapeutic success. We discuss the details of these trials along with the potential mechanism of vaccine efficacy and immune activations. The findings of these trials highlight the significance of a personalized immunotherapy approach and suggest that patient stratification could significantly advance the clinical management of GBM.

The application of next-generation sequencing-based genomics and corresponding analytical pipelines have significantly improved our ability to identify tumor-unique antigenic peptides ("neoantigens") for the design of personalized vaccine therapies and to monitor immune responses to these vaccines. The more recent implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning into several of the more complex analytical components of the neoantigen selection process has provided significant improvements across a number of previously difficult aspects within neoantigen identification, as we will describe. Related technologies and analytics have been developed that enable the characterization of changes to the tumor immune microenvironment facilitated by vaccination and monitor systemic responses in patients. Here, we review these new methods and their application to the design, implementation, and evaluation of cancer vaccines.

Immunotherapy is an established and efficient treatment strategy for a variety of malignancies. It aims to boost the anticancer properties of one's own immune system. Several immunotherapeutic options are available, but immune checkpoint blockers represent the most widely known and investigated. Anticancer vaccines represent an evolving area of immunotherapy that stimulate antigen-presenting cells, cytotoxic responses of CD8+ T cells, and the presence of memory T cells, among others. Over the years, different approaches for anticancer vaccines have been studied, such as mRNA and DNA vaccines, together with dendritic cell- and viral vector-based vaccines. Recently, an accumulating number of clinical studies have been performed to analyze the safety and potential efficacy of these agents. The aim of this review is to summarize recent advances regarding different types of therapeutic anticancer vaccines. Furthermore, it will discuss how recent advances in preclinical models can enhance clinical outcomes.

Cancer continues to be a major global health burden, with high morbidity and mortality. Building on the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cellular therapy, cancer vaccines have garnered significant interest, but their clinical success remains modest. Benefiting from advancements in technology, many meticulously designed cancer vaccines have shown promise, warranting further investigations to reach their full potential. Cancer vaccines hold unique benefits, particularly for patients resistant to other therapies, and they offer the ability to initiate broad and durable T cell responses. In this review, we highlight the antigen selection for cancer vaccines, introduce the immune responses induced by vaccines, and propose strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity. Furthermore, we summarize key features and notable clinical advances of various vaccine platforms. Lastly, we delve into the mechanisms of tumor resistance and explore the potential benefits of combining cancer vaccines with standard treatments and other immunomodulatory approaches to improve vaccine efficacy.

Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 8A (LRRC8A) is the essential subunit of ubiquitous volume-regulated anion channels (VRACs). LRCC8A is overexpressed in several cancers and promotes negative survival outcomes via a poorly defined mechanism. Here, we explored the role of LRRC8A and VRACs in the progression of glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and deadly primary brain tumor. We found that, as compared to healthy controls, LRRC8A mRNA was strongly upregulated in surgical GBM specimens, patient-derived GBM cell lines, and GBM datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our in-silico analysis indicated that patients belonging to the lowest LRRC8A expression quartile demonstrated a trend for extended life expectancy. In patient-derived GBM cultures, siRNA-driven LRRC8A knockdown reduced cell proliferation and additionally decreased intracellular chloride levels and inhibited activity of mTOR complex 2. The antiproliferative effect of LRRC8A downregulation was recapitulated with a pharmacological inhibitor of VRAC. Our ensuing biochemical and molecular biology analyses established that the LRRC8A-containing VRACs facilitate GBM proliferation via a new mechanism involving non-enzymatic actions of the chloride-sensitive protein kinase WNK1. Accordingly, the chloride-bound WNK1 stimulates mTORC2 and the mTORC2-dependent protein kinases AKT and SGK, which promote proliferation. These findings establish the new mTORC2-centric axis for VRAC dependent regulation of cellular functions and uncover potential targets for GBM intervention.

Treatment of tumor brain metastases remains challenging due to the ineffectiveness of drugs in crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Here, we proposed a potential strategy to target and modulate the meningeal lymphatic system for immunotherapy of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) through peripheral administration. CT/fluorescence dual-modality imaging demonstrated that the phospholipid nanoprobe (α-PLNPs) through intracisternal magna injection effectively labeled and long-range tracked the meningeal lymphatic pathway from meningeal lymphatic vessels (MLVs) to periphery drainage cervical lymph nodes (CLNs). Interestingly, the reverse pathway from CLNs to MLVs was also successfully labeled with α-PLNPs through cervical subcutaneous injection, facilitating the noninvasive delivery of immunomodulators to the meningeal lymphatics. Given this, we used melittin-carrying α-M-PLNPs to trigger the modulation of the meningeal lymphatic reverse pathway, which effectively prevents BCBM and prolongs the survival of mice through activating the antigen-presenting cells in the CLNs and promoting the migration of CD8+ T cells into the metastatic brain tumors. This study highlights the potential of the meningeal lymphatic reverse pathway for the immunotherapy of BCBM, which holds great promise for central nervous system disease therapy without the need for drug delivery via BBB.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex, highly structured, and dynamic ecosystem that plays a pivotal role in the progression of both primary and metastatic tumors. Precise assessment of the dynamic spatiotemporal features of the TME is crucial for understanding cancer evolution and designing effective therapeutic strategies. Cancer is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease, influenced not only by the TME, but also by a multitude of systemic factors, including whole-body metabolism, gut microbiome, endocrine signaling, and circadian rhythm. In this review, we summarize the intrinsic, extrinsic, and systemic factors contributing to the formation of 'cold' tumors within the framework of the cancer-immunity cycle. Correspondingly, we discuss potential strategies for converting 'cold' tumors into 'hot' ones to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Glioblastoma, the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system in adults, is also among the most lethal. Despite a comprehensive treatment approach which utilizes surgery and postoperative chemoradiation, prognosis typically remains dismal. However certain epigenetic modifications, such as methylation of the MGMT promoter, have been proven to correlate with improved post-treatment outcomes. The 2021 WHO classification emphasizes molecular characteristics, highlighting shared genomic alterations across different grades and positioning MGMT methylation as a key influencer of outcomes. A combined diagnostic approach involving current imaging technology and emerging radiomics and deep learning models may allow for timely and accurate prediction of MGMT methylation status and therefore earlier and more individualized treatment and prognostication. Though these advanced radiomics models are rapidly emerging, additional development, standardization, and implementation may lead to a higher and more individualized level of patient care. This review explores the potential of imaging features in predicting MGMT promoter methylation, a critical determinant of therapeutic response and patient outcomes.

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of cancer vaccines, highlighting their potential to revolutionize tumor prevention. Building on the success of vaccines against virus-related cancers, such as HPV- and HBV-associated cervical and liver cancers, the current challenge is to extend these achievements to the prevention of non-viral tumors and the treatment of preneoplastic or early neoplastic lesions. This review analyzes the critical aspects of preventive anti-cancer vaccination, focusing on the choice of target antigens, the development of effective vaccine platforms and technologies, and the use of various model systems for preclinical testing, from laboratory rodents to companion animals.

Purpose: Early treatment response assessments are crucial, and the results are known to better correlate with prognosis and survival outcomes. The present study was conducted to differentiate true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in long-term-surviving glioblastoma patients using our previously established multiparametric MRI-based predictive model, as well as to identify clinical factors impacting survival outcomes in these patients. Methods: We report six patients with glioblastoma that had an overall survival longer than 5 years. When tumor specimens were available from second-stage surgery, histopathological analyses were used to classify between TP (>25% characteristics of malignant neoplasms; n = 2) and PsP (<25% characteristics of malignant neoplasms; n = 2). In the absence of histopathology, modified RANO criteria were assessed to determine the presence of TP (n = 1) or PsP (n = 1). The predictive probabilities (PPs) of tumor progression were measured from contrast-enhancing regions of neoplasms using a multiparametric MRI-based prediction model. Subsequently, these PP values were used to define each lesion as TP (PP ≥ 50%) or PsP (PP < 50%). Additionally, detailed clinical information was collected. Results: Our predictive model correctly identified all patients with TP (n = 3) and PsP (n = 3) cases, reflecting a significant concordance between histopathology/modified RANO criteria and PP values. The overall survival varied from 5.1 to 12.3 years. Five of the six glioblastoma patients were MGMT promoter methylated. All patients were female, with a median age of 56 years. Moreover, all six patients had a good functional status (KPS ≥ 70), underwent near-total/complete resection, and received alternative therapies. Conclusions: Multiparametric MRI can aid in assessing treatment response in long-term-surviving glioblastoma patients.

In recent years, significant breakthroughs have been made in cancer therapy, particularly with the development of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies, owing to advances in tumor molecular biology and molecular immunology. High-grade gliomas (HGGs), characterized by their high malignancy, remain challenging to treat despite standard treatment regimens, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor treating fields (TTF). These therapies provide limited efficacy, highlighting the need for novel treatment strategies. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy have emerged as promising avenues for improving treatment outcomes in high-grade gliomas. This review explores the current status and recent advancements in targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches for high-grade gliomas.

Cancer vaccines, crucial in the immunotherapeutic landscape, are bifurcated into preventive and therapeutic types, both integral to combating oncogenesis. Preventive cancer vaccines, like those against HPV and HBV, reduce the incidence of virus-associated cancers, while therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to activate dendritic cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes for durable anti-tumor immunity. Recent advancements in vaccine platforms, such as synthetic peptides, mRNA, DNA, cellular, and nano-vaccines, have enhanced antigen presentation and immune activation. Despite the US Food and Drug Administration approval for several vaccines, the full therapeutic potential remains unrealized due to challenges such as antigen selection, tumor-mediated immunosuppression, and optimization of delivery systems. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the aims and implications of preventive and therapeutic cancer vaccine, the innovative discovery of neoantigens enhancing vaccine specificity, and the latest strides in vaccine delivery platforms. It also critically evaluates the role of adjuvants in enhancing immunogenicity and mitigating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The review further examines the synergistic potential of combining cancer vaccines with other therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, to improve therapeutic outcomes. Overcoming barriers such as effective antigen identification, immunosuppressive microenvironments, and adverse effects is critical for advancing vaccine development. By addressing these challenges, cancer vaccines can offer significant improvements in patient outcomes and broaden the scope of personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) exhibits a cellular hierarchy with a subpopulation of stem-like cells known as glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) that drive tumor growth and contribute to treatment resistance. NAD(H) emerges as a crucial factor influencing GSC maintenance through its involvement in diverse biological processes, including mitochondrial fitness and DNA damage repair. However, how GSCs leverage metabolic adaptation to obtain survival advantage remains elusive.

A multi-step process of machine learning algorithms was implemented to construct the glioma stemness-related score (GScore). Further in silico and patient tissue analyses validated the predictive ability of the GScore and identified a potential target, CYP3A5. Loss-of-function or gain-of-function genetic experiments were performed to assess the impact of CYP3A5 on the self-renewal and chemoresistance of GSCs both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic studies were conducted using nontargeted metabolomics, RNA-seq, seahorse, transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, ChIP‒qPCR, RT‒qPCR, western blotting, etc. The efficacy of pharmacological inhibitors of CYP3A5 was assessed in vivo.

Based on the proposed GScore, we identify a GSC target CYP3A5, which is highly expressed in GSCs and temozolomide (TMZ)-resistant GBM patients. This elevated expression of CYP3A5 is attributed to transcription factor STAT3 activated by EGFR signaling or TMZ treatment. Depletion of CYP3A5 impairs self-renewal and TMZ resistance of GSCs. Mechanistically, CYP3A5 maintains mitochondrial fitness to promote GSC metabolic adaption through the NAD⁺/NADH-SIRT1-PGC1α axis. Additionally, CYP3A5 enhances the activity of NAD-dependent enzyme PARP to augment DNA damage repair. Treatment with CYP3A5 inhibitor alone or together with TMZ effectively suppresses tumor growth in vivo.

Together, this study suggests that GSCs activate STAT3 to upregulate CYP3A5 to fine-tune NAD⁺/NADH for the enhancement of mitochondrial functions and DNA damage repair, thereby fueling tumor stemness and conferring TMZ resistance, respectively. Thus, CYP3A5 represents a promising target for GBM treatment.

The National Institute of Health (NIH) provides a sizable annual budget toward brain tumor research. However, funding allocation for specific pathologies remains poorly described. We aimed to characterize the current landscape of NIH funding toward brain tumors as a function of pathology.

NIHRePORTER was queried to identify studies focused on glioblastoma, pediatric glioma, oligodendroglioma, brain metastasis, meningioma, pituitary adenoma, and vestibular schwannoma, from 2000 to 2023. Studies with R, U, and P funding mechanisms were included. Data were compiled and assessed according to pathology.

Across these 7 tumors, 3320 unique studies with R, U, or P funding mechanisms were identified from 2000 to 2023. These were conducted across 480 unique institutions. The sum of funds allocated to all studies was $1 607 662 631. Glioblastoma commanded the largest portion of funds, representing 54% of R mechanisms, 55% of R01-funded studies, 48% of U mechanisms, and 49% of P mechanisms, and accounted for 51% ($813 556 423) of total funding. Brain metastasis was the second most-funded tumor, representing 31% of all R mechanisms, 31% of all R01-funded studies, 26% of all U mechanisms, and 28% of all P mechanisms, and accounted for 29% ($472 715 745) of funding. The remaining 14% of R mechanisms, 26% of U mechanisms, and 23% of P mechanisms focused on the remaining pathologies, and accounted for 20% ($321 390 463) of funding.

The current landscape of NIH funding for brain tumor research indicates that awarded mechanisms prioritize malignant intra-axial malignancies. Despite their prevalence, skull base neoplasia is far less represented in NIH-funded studies.

Glioblastoma is associated with a dismal prognosis with the standard of care involving surgery, radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy. This review investigates the features that make glioblastoma difficult to treat and the results of glioblastoma immunotherapy clinical trials so far. There have been over a hundred clinical trials involving immunotherapy in glioblastoma. We report the survival-related outcomes of every Phase III glioblastoma immunotherapy trial with online published results we could find at the time of writing. To date, the DCVax-L vaccine is the only immunotherapy shown to have statistically significant increased median survival compared with standard-of-care in a Phase III trial: 19.3 months versus 16.5 months. However, this trial used an external control group to compare with the intervention which limits its quality of evidence. In conclusion, glioblastoma immunotherapy requires further investigation to determine its significance in improving disease survival.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most common primary malignant brain tumors. Annually, there are about six instances recorded per 100,000 inhabitants. Treatment for GB has not advanced all that much. Novel medications have been investigated recently for the management of newly diagnosed and recurring instances of GBM. For GBM, surgery, radiation therapy, and alkylating chemotherapy are often used therapies. Immunotherapies, which use the patient's immune reaction against tumors, have long been seen as a potential cancer treatment. One such treatment is the dendritic cell (DC) vaccine. This cell-based vaccination works by stimulating the patient's own dendritic cells' antigenic repertoire, therefore inducing a polyclonal T-cell response. Systematic retrieval of information was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Specified keywords were used to search, and the articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals were associated with brain GBM, cancer, and Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination. Selected 90 articles were used in this manuscript, of which 30 articles were clinical trials. Compared to shared tumor antigen peptide vaccines, autologous cancer DCs have a greater ability to stimulate the immune system, which is why dendritic cell fusion vaccines have shown early promise in several clinical studies. Survival rates for vaccinated patients were notably better compared to matched or historical controls. For newly diagnosed patients, the median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 15 to 41.4 months, while the progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 6 to 25.3 months. We discovered through this analysis that autologous multiomics analysis of DC vaccines showed enhanced antitumor immunity with a focus on using activated, antigen-loaded donor DCs to trigger T-cell responses against cancer, particularly in glioblastoma. It also showed improved patient survival, especially when combined with standard chemoradiotherapy. DC vaccines show promise in treating GBM by enhancing survival and reducing tumor recurrence. However, challenges in vaccine production, antigen selection, and tumor heterogeneity highlight the need for continued research and optimization to improve efficacy and patient outcomes.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with a universally lethal prognosis despite maximal standard therapies. Here, we present a consensus treatment protocol based on the metabolic requirements of GBM cells for the two major fermentable fuels: glucose and glutamine. Glucose is a source of carbon and ATP synthesis for tumor growth through glycolysis, while glutamine provides nitrogen, carbon, and ATP synthesis through glutaminolysis. As no tumor can grow without anabolic substrates or energy, the simultaneous targeting of glycolysis and glutaminolysis is expected to reduce the proliferation of most if not all GBM cells. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) leverages diet-drug combinations that inhibit glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and growth signaling while shifting energy metabolism to therapeutic ketosis. The glucose-ketone index (GKI) is a standardized biomarker for assessing biological compliance, ideally via real-time monitoring. KMT aims to increase substrate competition and normalize the tumor microenvironment through GKI-adjusted ketogenic diets, calorie restriction, and fasting, while also targeting glycolytic and glutaminolytic flux using specific metabolic inhibitors. Non-fermentable fuels, such as ketone bodies, fatty acids, or lactate, are comparatively less efficient in supporting the long-term bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands of cancer cell proliferation. The proposed strategy may be implemented as a synergistic metabolic priming baseline in GBM as well as other tumors driven by glycolysis and glutaminolysis, regardless of their residual mitochondrial function. Suggested best practices are provided to guide future KMT research in metabolic oncology, offering a shared, evidence-driven framework for observational and interventional studies.

The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and lethal type of brain tumor in human adults. The standard of care offers minimal clinical benefit, and most GBM patients experience tumor recurrence after treatment. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of novel immunotherapies or other therapeutic strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in many advanced cancers. However, the benefit of immune-based treatments in GBM is limited because of the unique brain immune profiles, GBM cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we present a detailed overview of current immunotherapeutic strategies and discuss the challenges and potential molecular mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in GBM. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth discussion regarding the strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in GBM, which will likely require combination therapies.