Cardiovascular co-morbidity in chronic kidney disease: Current knowledge and future research needs

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is recognised as a health concern globally and leads to high rates of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. CKD is itself an independent risk factor for unfavorable health outcomes that include cardiovascular disease (CVD). Coronary artery disease is the primary type of CVD in CKD patients and a significant cause of death among renal transplant patients. Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CVD exist in patients with CKD. Traditional factors include smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes which are highly prevalent in CKD patients. Non-traditional risk factors of CKD are mainly uraemia-specific and increase in prevalence as kidney function declines. Some examples of uraemia-specific risk factors that have been well documented include low levels of haemoglobin, albuminuria, and abnormal bone and mineral metabolism. Therapeutic interventions targeted at more traditional risk factors which contribute to CVD, have not had the desired effect on lowering CVD events and mortality in those suffering with CKD. Future research is warranted to delineate clear evidence to the benefit of modifying non-traditional risk factors.

Key Words: Cardiovascular disease, Chronic kidney disease, Risk factors, Inflammation

Core tip: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been recognised as a health concern globally and leads to high morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. CKD is an independent risk factor for several different unfavourable outcomes including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CVD exist in patients with CKD. Non-traditional risk factors of CKD are mainly uraemia-specific and include release of large levels of inflammatory and prothrombotic factors, low levels of haemoglobin, albuminuria, and abnormal bone and mineral metabolism. Future research is warranted to delineate clear evidence to the benefit of modifying non-traditional risk factors

INTRODUCTION

CKD has become recognised as a key independent risk factor for several adverse health outcomes including cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is now increasingly apparent that individuals are more likely to die from cardiovascular disease than to develop end stage renal disease (ESRD)[1-3]. Initial evidence indicating a relationship between renal dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular events became apparent in those on dialysis, where the number of CVD deaths was found to be raised. Almost 50% of those suffering from established ESRD are unlikely to survive a CVD event[2-5]. Compared to the age adjusted CVD mortality in the general populations this is approximately 15 to 30 times higher[4,6]. Although true across all ages it is particularly more profound in the 25-34 year age group, where a 500-fold increase in CVD mortality rate is found when comparing it to their counterparts in the general population[1].

Defining CKD

According to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), CKD can be defined as either damage to kidneys or a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m² for a period of ≥ 3 mo, with implications for health. Kidney damage can be defined by structural (detected by imaging) or functional abnormalities of the kidneys with or without a decrease in GFR. These may be apparent as either pathological irregularities or as indicators of kidney damage which include albuminuria > 30 mg/d, urine sediment abnormalities and electrolyte and other abnormalities secondary to tubular disorders.

Individuals with CKD are usually staged according to their GFR levels (Stage 1-5) and albuminuria category, with a higher stage representing lower GFR levels[7,8].

Traditional vs non-traditional risk factors

Traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic CVD are not enough to justify the significant upsurge in cardiovascular mortality seen amongst CKD patients and in particular ESRD. This has led to the suggestion that in patients with CKD two groups of CVD risk factors can be defined; traditional and non-traditional. Traditional factors are those described in the Framingham study[9] including hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia and diabetes that are well known to contribute to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, and are highly prevalent in CKD patients[10]. Non-traditional risk factors of CKD increase in prevalence as kidney function declines. Some examples of such risk factors have been and includes, of large levels of inflammatory and prothrombotic factors, low levels of haemoglobin, albuminuria, and abnormal bone and mineral metabolism[4,11]. Some of these non-traditional risk factors will be discussed in more detail below (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors in chronic kidney disease[10,11]. CKD: Chronic kidney disease; CVD: Cardiovascular disease.

CKD AND CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES

Left ventricular hypertrophy and CKD

Echocardiographic studies report a high prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), systolic/diastolic dysfunction and ventricular dilatation (dilated cardiomyopathy) in patients with ESRD[12-15]. They are more strongly associated with an unfavourable prognosis than more established cardiovascular risk factors[14,16]. These structural and functional abnormalities can lead to sudden, presumed arrhythmic death and account for 50% of cardiovascular deaths in patients with ESRD[17-19].

LVH exists in 70% of patients starting dialysis and is an independent risk factor for cardiac death[12,13,20]. In a cross-sectional study by Stewart and colleagues, 296 non-diabetic renal disease patients underwent echocardiographic monitoring. The results showed that left ventricular mass was increased from even the earliest stages of renal disease (near-normal renal function). Eccentric LVH was found to be the prevalent pattern. The increase in LVH was progressive and 80% of those on renal replacement therapy were found to have LVH, with the concentric pattern being more dominant[19].

In an early study by Levin et al[21], 175 pre-dialysis patients underwent echocardiographic monitoring and had their left ventricular mass index (LVMI) assessed. The study demonstrated that the presence of LVH increases with progressive renal decline, reaching 45.2% in patients having severe renal impairment (CrCl < 25 mL/min)[21].

Paoletti et al[22] studied 244 non-diabetic pre-dialysis patients and found a greater prevalence, with LVH being associated with 51% in CKD stage 1 and 2 patients and 78% in CKD stages 3 to 5. In all studies - age, haemoglobin, systolic blood pressure and CrCl were found to be significantly different between those who either did or did not have LVH.

Coronary artery disease and CKD

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the primary types of CVD in patients with CKD and is a major cause of death among renal transplant patients[23-27]. The prevalence varies from 24% in young patients without diabetes, to 85% in elderly haemodialysis patients with diabetes[28,29].

In earlier studies it was found that approximately 25%-40% of asymptomatic patients undergoing coronary angiography before their renal transplant exhibited evidence of significant stenosis (50%-70%) in one or more coronary arteries[30-32]. Furthermore, Liu and colleagues, showed that patients with CKD were found to have a 2.5 times higher chance of having 3-vessel disease compared with patients without CKD[33].

Kiyosue et al[27] studied the association found amongst renal dysfunction and the severity of CAD. It looked at 572 patients and graded severity according to how many stenotic coronary arteries were there and the estimated GFR (eGFR). More stenotic coronary arteries were present in the CKD group compared to other groups. Multivessel stenosis was also greater in the CKD group[27].

Whether or not CAD should be screened for and interventions offered for patients with advanced kidney disease remains a contentious issue. Coronary angiography remains the modality of choice for CAD investigation in CKD patients, however its invasiveness and associated risks in a group at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy, makes it unfavourable[34,35]. While other imaging modalities exist which are effective (CT coronary angiography, cardiovascular MRI), there are several factors including significant costs, adverse affects as well as technical difficulties that must be considered[36,37].

NON-TRADITIONAL RISK FACTORS

Anaemia

Anaemia is an anticipated consequence as renal function declines, and generally begins to develop before ESRD. The severity of anaemia however increases with declining kidney function[38,39]. There is a strong association between anaemia and cardiovascular complications. Specifically, anaemia is linked to LVH development, found in up to 74% of patients at the commencement of renal replacement therapy and is an independent predictor of consequent cardiac morbidity and mortality among patients with ESRD[12,13,21,40]. In an Observational study it was demonstrated that each 10 g/L drop in haemoglobin, leads to a 20%-40% increased risk of developing heart failure, LVH or mortality in those patients on long-term dialysis[41]. Interestingly sustained anaemia is often associated with eccentric hypertrophy, whereas hypertension is associated with concentric hypertrophy[21].

Physiologically, chronic anaemia leads to an increased cardiac output (CO) as a result of decreased afterload, an increase in preload and an increase in chronotropic/inotropic effects. This will eventually lead to ventricular dilation and LVH[42-44]. This chronic rise in CO eventually causes remodeling of the central elastic arteries of aorta or carotids. Subsequently it can result in enlargement of arteries and compensatory intima-media thickening, or arteriosclerosis. If either is present, they could be more directly correlated with future CVD risk (Figure 2)[44,45].

Figure 2 Physiological impact of chronic anaemia in chronic kidney disease. CVD: Cardiovascular disease.

One of the first studies to demonstrate anaemia as an independent risk for CVD outcomes was carried out in the ARIC studies. It found anaemia to be associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.41 for CVD in the entire cohort[46].

Jurkouitz et al[47] looked at 13329 patients and found a significant link between the haemoglobin (Hb) level and the serum creatinine (S-cr). In anaemic patients, a high S-cr level can result in the risk of coronary events rising by 2.7 fold when compared to a normal S-cr. This is independent of risk factors that include age, gender and race[47].

Levin et al[48] focused on the association between anaemia and LVH. 246 participants with a creatinine clearance of 25 to 75 mL/min (0.42 to 1.25 mL/s) underwent echocardiographic imaging done at baseline and 12 mo to specifically investigate LV growth. The results showed that each 0.5-g/dL (5-g/L) drop in Hb level led to a 32% increased odds of LV growth[48].

Further anaemia and echocardiographic studies carried out by Foley et al[41], demonstrated that each 1 g/dL drop in Hb was independently linked with the presence of left ventricular dilatation on repeat echocardiogram and the subsequent development of new/recurrent heart failure. Furthermore, every 1 g/dL drop in the haemoglobin level was independently linked with mortality when patients were on dialysis therapy[41].

Weiner et al[49] looked at the combination of both LVH and anaemia in patients at the earlier stages of renal dysfunction (eGFR 30-60), revealing that patients who had LVH as well as anaemia, had a risk of cardiac disease that increased by 4-fold compared with individuals who had neither anaemia nor LVH. However in those having LVH but no anaemia or anaemia but no LVH, the risk of CVD outcomes did not increase significantly[49].

The strong association between anaemia and cardiovascular complications has led to several studies investigating whether correction of haematocrit has any benefit on adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besarab et al[50], looked at 1233 patients on haemodialysis with heart disease who were prescribed recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin), looking at length of time till death or the first non-fatal myocardial infarction. Six hundred eighteen patients received sufficient doses to sustain a haematocrit of 42% and 615 to sustain a haematocrit of 30%. The study was halted due to the higher haematocrit target group having an almost significant mortality risk, and the fact that thrombotic vascular access events were also higher. No single unifying explanation was thought to be the cause[50].

The Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anaemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta (CREATE) trial looked at patients in the earlier stages of CKD (3 and 4) to try and achieve levels of normal; 130-150 g/L and low to normal; 105-115 g/L Hb. The normal Hb group was found to have an improved overall health and quality of life. LVMI was found in both groups to be stable, and thus treating the anaemia did not have an effect on the LVH progression[51]. This is supported by many other studies[52-54].

The Anaemia Working Group of European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) published a statement on its opinion of what Hb targets should be. Following results of the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT) Study they maintained that Hb values of 11-12 g/dL should be targeted in CKD patients, and without deliberately aiming for targets above 13 g/dL[55,56].

Correcting the anaemia associated with ESRD with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-EPO)/ iron supplementation is essential, and results in significant improvements of Hb levels as well as a reduction in the need for blood transfusion requirements[57,58]. Recent literature however, suggests excess iron as well as contributing to arrhythmias and heart failure may also have a role to play in the development of vascular calcification[59,60].

A cross sectional study by Bagheri et al[61] looked at 337 patients to evaluate the importance of iron stores in the risk evaluation of atherosclerotic disease. All patients had an angiogram of the coronary artery, and the study revealed that the iron serum level was significantly more raised in the severe atherosclerosis group than in the normal group[61].

It is thought that one of the ways in which iron contributes to vascular calcification is by enhancing the oxidative stress process through the induction of reactive oxygen species. This subsequently activates molecular mechanisms that result in vascular calcification[60].

Drüeke et al[62] looked at the role of I.V. iron therapy in 79 dialysis patients. They concluded that iron therapy (at dose 1.5-2 g per year) can lead to arterial wall damage in the early stages of atherosclerosis[62]. This was later supported by Reis et al[63] who showed a significant relationship between ferritin, I.V. iron dosage and common carotid artery intima-media thickness in 60 dialysis patients[63].

Further research is required to assess the effect that iron has on arterial calcification, however the potential of iron to cause oxidant injury and CVD should not be disregarded.

Homocysteine

Homocysteine (HC) at high levels can be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease[64]. Levels of HC are elevated in renal failure and there is an inverse relationship between HC levels and GFR, such that more than 85% of patients on dialysis will experience a mild to moderate level of hyperhomocysteinemia[64,65].

The pathogenesis of hyperhomocysteinemia in renal dysfunction remains to be elucidated[64,66]. There is some evidence to suggest that high levels of homocysteine may be due to a reduced HC clearance and insufficient metabolism by less well functioning kidneys. However there is no direct evidence to support this[64].

Several epidemiological studies suggest that a high level of HC specifies a higher risk of CVD as well as stroke[67,68]. While the underlying mechanisms are yet to be defined, both in vitro/vivo studies suggest that production of potent reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased endothelial nitric oxide play a pivotal role. Thus high HC levels may facilitate oxidative damage at the vascular interface[69-71]. Other proposed mechanisms suggest that elevated HC causes proliferation of smooth muscle cells thus leading to increased oxidation of low-density lipoproteins[72]. Elevated HC is also associated with increased platelet aggregation and hence favouring a prothrombotic state[73]. This strongly links elevated levels of HC to the enhancement of atherosclerosis and other thrombotic events.

Several trials have looked at the efficacy of HC-lowering treatments on clinical outcomes. Two major studies, Homocysteine study (HOST)[74] and Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation-2 (HOPE-2)[75] looked for any benefits in certain vitamins including; folic acid, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 supplements on overall CVD risk and mortality. Both studies found no significant benefit on CVD risk or all-cause mortality. Therefore based on these trials, there is not much to support using HC-lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular outcomes.

Calcium and calcium-phosphorus product

Dysfunction in the metabolism of minerals occurs early in CKD. As GFR levels decline, there is a decrease in serum calcium (Ca) levels while parathyroid hormone (PTH) and phosphate levels become elevated[76]. An elevated level of serum phosphorus is highly prevalent in ESRD patients, and is a significant and independent risk factor of all cause and cardiovascular mortality[77]. A study by Block et al[77] found that phosphate levels greater than 6.5 mg/dL were associated with a far greater mortality risk (27%) when compared with levels of between 2.4-6.5 mg/dL[77].

Further studies by Kestenbaum et al[78] demonstrated that PO4 levels > 3.5 mg/dL are linked with an increased risk of death that is significant. Furthermore, for every 0.323 mmol/L serum phosphate increase, there was an increased risk of death by 23%[78].

In a study by Dhingra et al[79] it was suggested that even phosphate levels within the normal range can contribute to CVD in patients who have kidney function within the normal, to near-normal range. Furthermore phosphate levels above 1.1 mmol/L can increase the risk of CVD events by 55%, following adjustment for any traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The cholesterol and recurrent events study (CARE) enlisted 4159 patients who had a background of previous myocardial infarction concluded that there was a graded, independent relationship between baseline fasting serum phosphate level and the subsequent risk for all-cause mortality, the development of new heart failure, and coronary events[80].

Calcium-phosphate products are also associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in CKD patients. Ganesh et al[81] demonstrated that for every rise in serum calcium-phosphate product by 0.8 mmol2/l2, there was an increased sudden death risk of approximately 7% in those on long-term haemodialysis[81].

The underlying mechanism through which hyperphosphatemia and an increase in calcium-phosphate product leads to cardiovascular disease is not well established. One theory is that high phosphate levels exacerbate the atherosclerosis process by increased calcification and proliferation of smooth muscle[82].

Raggi et al[83] carried out a cross-sectional study of 205 patients on hemodialysis who had baseline electron-beam tomography (EBT) testing to evaluate both vascular/valvular calcification. The incidence and degree of valvular calcification was found to be remarkable with 45% of subjects having calcification of the mitral valve, and 34% having calcification of the aortic valve, compared with 3%-5% prevalence in the general population. More than 70% of patients had coronary artery calcification significant enough to be linked with a high risk of future MI and coronary death in the general population[83].

Goodman et al[84] screened for calcification using EBT in 39 young patients (age range 7 to 30 years of age) with ESRD on dialysis. It found evidence of coronary calcification in 14 of the 16 patients aged 20-30 years[84].

Current KDOQI guidelines advise that serum phosphate levels should be maintained at 0.8 mmol/L in stage 3-4 CKD and between 1.1 and 1.8 mmol/L in stage 5 CKD[8]. Several phosphate binders exist in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia, however the choice of binders is controversial.

Calcium-based binders have been shown in observational studies to be associated with arterial calcification[84,85]. Sevelamer is a non-absorbable agent that does not contain calcium and has been shown in a significant number of trials to be effective in lowering serum phosphate levels. It has also been shown to have beneficial effects on vascular calcification progression and bone disease[86].

Two large studies have compared Sevelamer with calcium-based binders. In the Renagel in New Dialysis (RIND) trial it found that calcium-based phosphate binders resulted in higher cases of mortality than compared to Sevelamer[87]. The Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) study however showed that the difference in mortality was not significant. Conflicting results can be possibly explained by difference in patient population[88].

Albuminuria

Not only is albuminuria a marker of renal damage, it is also an independent risk factor for CVD and leads to an increase in all cause mortality in diabetics, those with hypertension and in relatively unselected or general populations[89-93].

In the Heart Outcomes Evaluation (HOPE) trial results showed that in those with or without diabetes, albuminuria of any level can be a risk factor for CVD events. It also found microalbuminuria to result in an increased risk of future stroke, myocardial infarctions and death in both diabetic and non-diabetics without CKD.

Additionally, for every increase in the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) by 0.4 mg/mmol, there was a 5.9% increase in the HR hazard ratio (HR) of major CVD outcomes[91].

The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial studied 8206 patients in order to establish if the relationship between albuminuria and cardiovascular risk can be useful in predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. It discovered that for every increase of the ACR by 10-fold, cardiovascular deaths increased up to 98% in non-diabetics without CKD[92].

These trials demonstrate that the relationship between albuminuria and experiencing a CV event is not entirely restricted to the microalbuminuria cut off range. The relationship between the ACR and CV disease can extend to at least as low as 0.5 mg/mmol and thus an ACR of 2.0 mg/mmol, the threshold for the screening of microalbuminuria may not be appropriate when considering the risk for CV outcomes[91,92].

Microalbuminuria has also been associated with several lipid abnormalities. In a study by Kahri et al[94], the lipid profiles in both those having microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria were compared. It found that the high-density lipoproteins (HDL) that are known to be cardioprotective were 11.6-fold lower in microalbuminuric patients compared with normoalbuminuric patients[94].

The pathophysiology behind how microalbuminuria contributes to CVD remains to be fully understood, however studies suggest that microalbuminuria might reflect endothelial dysfunction[95,96]. As well as causing impaired arterial dilatory capacity[97], microalbuminuria has been shown to increase levels of several adhesion molecules including Von willeband factor (vWF), Vascular adhesion molecule-1, thrombomodulin, PAI-1, serum IV collagen and t-PA[87]. These all favour the formation of atherosclerosis[98].

ROLE OF INFLAMMATION, OXIDATIVE STRESS, HYPERTENSION AND URIC ACID

Inflammation

It is now well established that the incidence of acute-phase inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with ESRD is high, which are both significant contributors to a high degree of CVD morbidity and mortality[99-101]. Oberg et al[102] confirmed presence of increased oxidative stress and acute-phase inflammation in early and advanced stages of CKD (3-5) compared to healthy subjects. Renal insufficiency is associated with increased levels of several different inflammatory and pro-coagulant biomarkers, the main two being CRP and IL-6, which are strong predictors of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in ESRD[103-105]. Elevation of these markers as well as fibrinogen, PAP, factor VII-VIII, and D-dimer was apparent even in those who had no evidence of clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease[106-108].

The extent to which GFR is related to biomarkers of inflammation is controversial. While one cross sectional study found that increased CRP was associated with decreased GFR, other studies have found serum CRP levels do not correlate with either GFR or disease progression[109].

A study by Friedman et al[110], which looked at both CRP and albumin in dialysis patients, found CRP to be a significant predictor of death and suggested that these patients need to have careful evaluation as well as monitoring irrespective of whether albumin concentration is in the normal range[111]. Evidence seems to suggest that CRP may also be responsible for numerous processes involved in propagating atherosclerosis, which includes plaque initiation, formation, and rupture[111].

Inflammatory and prothrombotic markers have been heavily linked with CVD and mortality in CKD patients. Shlipak et al[112] however, demonstrated that although CRP and IL-6 are linked with CVD, their collective impact on cardiovascular mortality is actually far less significant compared to the collective impact of the more traditional risk factors[112].

Oxidative stress

Numerous experimental studies have revealed that endothelium derived vasoactive mediator nitric oxide (NO) has a vital part to play in progressive kidney damage. Low levels of NO leads to endothelial cell injury and dysfunction, and plays a major role in potentiating atherosclerosis[113-115]. Animal studies in which NO synthase (NOS) was inhibited resulted in enhanced progression of the atherosclerotic process as well as causing impairment in the angiogenic response and loss of the capillary endothelium[116]. Endogenous NOS inhibitor, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is thought to be significantly associated with the oxidative stress process through its inhibition of NO, and thus leading to endothelial dysfunction and vascular damage[117]. ADMA correlates with traditional and non-traditional risk factors, it is recognised as a strong indicator in atherosclerosis, and is a strong independent predictor of death and incident cardiovascular complications in both CKD and non-CKD patients[117-119].

In a cohort study of 131 patients with CKD, the correlation between levels of ADMA and the probability of progressing to ESRD and death was investigated. ADMA was found to be reliable in predicting event occurrence independently of other confounders, such as GFR, proteinuria and several others. Furthermore, ADMA was found to be inversely related to GFR and signifies an independent marker of risk for ESRD progression and mortality[117].

Several studies have looked at interventions in order to reduce the plasma levels of ADMA or its binding capability to NOS in an attempt to decrease any risk of CVD events in those suffering from CKD. Lerman et al[120] studied the effects of supplementing 26 patients with L-arginine, a precursor to NO in order determine its future therapeutic use. It found that following 6 mo of supplementation, it improved endothelium function in coronary vessels while also providing symptomatic relief and lowering levels of endothelin[120]. Further support of these results come from studies by Clarkson et al[121] who explained that L-arginine orally enhanced the peripheral endothelium-dependent dilation of hypercholesterolaemic patients, as well as Rector et al[122] who showed that L-arginine was helpful in heart failure subjects.

Other studies have looked at the antioxidant effects of acetylcysteine and Vitamin E. Both supplements have demonstrated a reduction in composite cardiovascular end points in haemodialysis patients[123,124].

Hypertension

Hypertension itself can act as a dominant risk factor for CVD in patients with CKD, and it is almost inevitable that CKD patients will have hypertension. The underlying mechanism considered most important in the elevation of blood pressure, is related to retention of sodium as well as stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system[125]. Sympathetic activation and elevated catecholamine release in CKD has also been linked[126,127]. Cardiac damage caused by hypertension in CKD patients is thought to be via LVH induction[128].

Two major studies have evaluated the relationship between renal function and mortality in hypertensive patients. In the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group, 10490 patients where analysed to assess all-cause mortality. It demonstrated that in those who had a baseline creatinine of ≥ 1.7 mg/dL the mortality rate (8-year) was ≥ 3 times greater than that of all other patients[129].

The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study supports these outcomes. They evaluated 18790 patients over 3.8 years, only 10% of whom had evidence of atherosclerotic plaques. It found that the relative risk for both mortality and CVD events was 1.65 and 1.58 respectively, in those with a GFR < 60 mL/min compared with those who had a GFR > 60 mL/min[130].

Despite strong evidence linking CVD mortality in hypertensive CKD patients, the ideal blood pressure (BP) targets in these patients remains a challenging area. The National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence (NICE) suggests that antihypertensive treatment be commenced in those < 80 years with declining renal function and hypertension-stage 1, to aim for a blood pressure of < 140 ⁄ 90 mmHg. The BP during haemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis period should not exceed > 160 mmHg[8,131]. However excessive BP lowering in these patients may prove to be detrimental due to the risk of exacerbating myocardial stunning[132-134]. There remains an insufficient number of RCT trials on optimum blood pressure control in CKD patients and it is important to address this issue.

Uric acid

While hyperuricemia is a well-recognised consequence of impaired renal function it is also linked with increasing hypertension risk, ESRD and unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes[135].

UA has been demonstrated as an independent risk factor for the onset of CKD, in a healthy population. Obermayer et al[136] reported that even with a modest rise in UA levels there was a two-fold increased risk of renal disease, whilst at 535 µmol/L or more the risk was three-fold.

Sedaghat et al[137] further supported this theory. They analysed 2601 subjects aged > 55 years who where followed up over a 6.5 year period. They exhibited that for each 60 μmol/L rise of uric acid, there was a decline in the eGFR by 0.19 mL/min. In hypertensive patients the decline in eGFR was more profound[137].

The detrimental effects of hyperuricemia are also well documented in CVD. In the health professionals follow-up study hyperuricemia was found to increase CVD mortality even more than compared with those who already had established heart disease[138]. This was further supported by long-term data from the NHANES I study that demonstrated that there was a proportionate rise in CVD mortality with UA levels[139].

Studies have looked at the use of xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitors (Allopurinol, Febuxostat), as potential treatment to prevent further renal deterioration and to provide a cardioprotective effect. In one meta-analyses, allopurinol was found to produce a small but yet significant reduction of both systolic/diastolic blood pressure. This is further supported by randomised controlled trials, where again a significant blood pressure drop is achieved with UA-lowering agents[140].

Rekhraj et al[141] demonstrated that treating patients with diagnosed LVH and ischaemic heart disease with high dose allopurinol (600 mg/d) for 9 mo, resulted in a reduction of the LVM and end systolic volume as well as improving endothelial function[141]. This modest reduction in LVM was shown in the LIFE study to reduce mortality and cardiovascular outcomes by 13%[142,143].

In the context of CKD, a study by Goicoechea et al[144] demonstrated that in those patients receiving allopurinol for 12 mo there was a diminution in the deterioration of kidney function or the need for dialysis compared to placebo. (143) In another study allopurinol reduced eGFR in patients with, established CKD (stage 3) independent of age, sex or diabetes. Adverse cardiovascular events were also found to be reduced[144].

FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS

CKD is a major health concern globally and leads to high rates of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with CKD is significantly attributable to cardiovascular outcomes. While we have tried to briefly analyse some of the current knowledge underlying the strong association between CKD and CV outcomes there still remains several non-traditional risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms to be described.

Several markers have a clear association with current and subsequent CV outcomes including; reduced GFR, albuminuria, troponins, phosphate, vitamin D, FGF-23 and NT-proB-NP[145-152]. While these markers are present, there remains no routine screening for CVD in CKD patients, despite strong evidence supporting this. The screening and treatment of patients with abnormal markers cannot only reduce overall cardiovascular events and kidney failure, but could also prove to be cost effective.

Perhaps one reason for lack of implementation is due to the fact that these diagnostic screening tools are lacking in sensitivity and specificity to make them reliable, and are in need of more RCT-quality evidence in order to guide intervention.

Therapeutic interventions that aim at reducing traditional risk factors for CVD have not been shown to be effective at lowering the incidence of CVD events or mortality in those with CKD. More importantly, strategies in risk reduction have inadequately tackled non-traditional risk factors that have been exhibited as being essential in the progression of CVD. Furthermore there remains to be clear evidence with regards to the benefit of modifying these non-traditional risk factors.

In view of current knowledge it is perhaps favourable to investigate preventive strategies in early-stage chronic kidney disease and multifactorial interventions in late-stage chronic kidney disease.

Some of the excess CVD risk associated with CKD has been explained by a multifactorial range of myocardial and vascular insult including; uraemic cardiomyopathy, inflammation, oxidative stress, autonomic dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction. However, it is very likely that there are as yet undiscovered factors, and inter-relationships, which are possibly of great significance.