BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Tunis AS, Mcinnes MDF, Hanna R, Esmail K. Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement? Radiology 2013;269:413-26. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13130273] [Cited by in Crossref: 101] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96] [Article Influence: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Lu Y, Ioannidis JP. Transparent Communication of Radiology Research: Reporting Guidelines and Beyond. Acad Radiol 2016;23:529-30. [PMID: 27017133 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Prager R, Pratte M, Guy A, Bala S, Bachar R, Kim DJ, Millington S, Salameh JP, McGrath TA, McInnes MD. Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021:bmjebm-2020-111652. [PMID: 33785511 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111652] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Salameh J, Bossuyt PM, Mcgrath TA, Thombs BD, Hyde CJ, Macaskill P, Deeks JJ, Leeflang M, Korevaar DA, Whiting P, Takwoingi Y, Reitsma JB, Cohen JF, Frank RA, Hunt HA, Hooft L, Rutjes AWS, Willis BH, Gatsonis C, Levis B, Moher D, Mcinnes MDF. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2632] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 McInnes MD, Bossuyt PM. Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research. Radiology. 2015;277:13-21. [PMID: 26402491 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142779] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57] [Article Influence: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Siemens W, Schwarzer G, Rohe MS, Buroh S, Meerpohl JJ, Becker G. Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients-A methodological study. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;136:84-95. [PMID: 33741503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Sun X, Zhou X, Yu Y, Liu H. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:154. [PMID: 30497417 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0622-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 van der Pol CB, McInnes MD, Petrcich W, Tunis AS, Hanna R. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates? PLoS One 2015;10:e0119892. [PMID: 25775455 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119892] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Sims MT, Henning NM, Wayant CC, Vassar M. Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of "Instructions for Authors". Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:137. [PMID: 27881175 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-016-0331-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Chow R, Li A, Wu N, Martin M, Wessels JM, Foster WG. Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021;304:1417-26. [PMID: 34495378 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06228-y] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Ndze VN, Jaca A, Wiysonge CS. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15:2836-43. [PMID: 31166843 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1623998] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Tounakaki O, Tsakou Α, Malamas A, Chrisoula D, Ioannis S, Elias Z. Assessment of reporting quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration published from April 2014 to May 2018 using prisma statement. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:1163-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01282-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 PLOS Medicine Editors. Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001504. [PMID: 24013839 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Oermann MH, Nicoll LH, Chinn PL, Conklin JL, McCarty M, Amarasekara S. Quality of Author Guidelines in Nursing Journals. J Nurs Scholarsh 2018;50:333-40. [PMID: 29645403 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12383] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Hendriksma M, Joosten MH, Peters JP, Grolman W, Stegeman I. Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169316. [PMID: 28060869 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169316] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Korevaar DA, Salameh JP, Vali Y, Cohen JF, McInnes MDF, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM. Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Res Synth Methods 2020;11:343-53. [PMID: 31981399 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1389] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Mcgrath TA, Mcinnes MDF, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PMM. Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy. Radiology 2016;281:78-85. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152229] [Cited by in Crossref: 44] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Bossuyt PMM. Informative Reporting of Systematic Reviews in Radiology. Radiology 2013;269:313-4. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131614] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Hartling L. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17:48. [PMID: 28335734 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 48] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Buczinski S, Ferraro S, Vandeweerd JM. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review. Prev Vet Med 2018;161:50-9. [PMID: 30466658 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.011] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Alabousi M, Alabousi A, Mcgrath TA, Cobey KD, Budhram B, Frank RA, Nguyen F, Salameh JP, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Mcinnes MDF. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability? Eur Radiol 2019;29:517-26. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5567-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Lee SY, Sagoo H, Whitehurst K, Wellstead G, Fowler AJ, Agha RA, Orgill D. Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:101-5. [PMID: 26719993 DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1726] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Katsura M, Kuriyama A, Tada M, Yamamoto K, Furukawa TA. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017411. [PMID: 28827269 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017411] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 McInnes M, Tunis AS. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting. Radiology 2014;272:303-4. [PMID: 24956054 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140830] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Campbell JM. What's the evidence for this evidence? JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2016;14:1-2. [PMID: 27635738 DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003062] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Martins DE, Astur N, Kanas M, Ferretti M, Lenza M, Wajchenberg M. Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview. Spine J 2016;16:667-75. [PMID: 26826347 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.185] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Suh CH, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Performance of CT in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:154-61. [PMID: 27789450 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4967] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Tam WW, Lo KK, Khalechelvam P. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013905. [PMID: 28174224 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, Yazdi F, Turner L, Thielman J, Altman DG, Hirst A, Hoey J, Palepu A, Schulz KF, Moher D. Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMJ 2014;348:g3804. [PMID: 24965222 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g3804] [Cited by in Crossref: 123] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103] [Article Influence: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Eastwood P, Bultynck L, van Eekelen A, Norman C. Towards better-quality research reporting in Respirology. Respirology 2014;19:1093-4. [PMID: 25302754 DOI: 10.1111/resp.12386] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Oyinlola JO, Campbell J, Kousoulis AA. Is real world evidence influencing practice? A systematic review of CPRD research in NICE guidances. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:299. [PMID: 27456701 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1562-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Mcgrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Cronin P, Salameh J, Kraaijpoel N, Schieda N, Mcinnes MD. Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:e51-64. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26198] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163309. [PMID: 27669416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Downie LE, Makrai E, Bonggotgetsakul Y, Dirito LJ, Kristo K, Pham MN, You M, Verspoor K, Pianta MJ. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:1051. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2620] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Brusselaers N. How to teach the fundamentals of meta-analyses. Annals of Epidemiology 2015;25:948-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.08.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Wu AM, Wu CM, Margo CE, Greenberg PB. Reviewing the reviewers: Appraisal of the United States Veterans Health Administration report on femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2015;41:237-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Zhang H, Han J, Zhu Y, Lau W, Schwartz ME, Xie G, Dai S, Shen Y, Wu M, Shen F, Yang T. Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016;70:4-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Salameh J, Mcinnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, Mcgrath TA, Frank R, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Kraaijpoel N, Levis B, Bossuyt PM. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. Clinical Chemistry 2019;65:291-301. [DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.292987] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Bonetti AF, Della Rocca AM, Lucchetta RC, Tonin FS, Fernandez-Llimos F, Pontarolo R. Mapping the characteristics of meta-analyses of pharmacy services: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm 2020;42:1252-60. [PMID: 32430882 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01058-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part I. General Guidance and Tips. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:1175-1187. [PMID: 26576106 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1175] [Cited by in Crossref: 164] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 157] [Article Influence: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Sims MT, Checketts JX, Wayant C, Vassar M. Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals: a meta-epidemiological study of journals' instructions for authors. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2018;16:55-65. [PMID: 28863029 DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000120] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Hong JU, Kim JH, Lee KH, Lee M, Hyun IY, Cho SG, Kim YJ, Lee HY, Kim GR. Characteristics, trend, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nuclear medicine: A bibliometric analysis of studies published between 2005 and 2016. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15785. [PMID: 31124972 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015785] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 McGrath TA, Moher D, McInnes MDF. Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA). Syst Rev 2019;8:166. [PMID: 31296260 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Pieper D, Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Büchter RB, Hartling L. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017;6:73. [PMID: 28388960 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0468-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Gupta S, Rajiah P, Middlebrooks EH, Baruah D, Carter BW, Burton KR, Chatterjee AR, Miller MM. Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices. Acad Radiol 2018;25:1481-90. [PMID: 30442379 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Xia L, Xu J, Guzzo TJ. Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature. PeerJ 2017;5:e3129. [PMID: 28439452 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3129] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Prager R, Gagnon L, Bowdridge J, Unni RR, McGrath TA, Cobey K, Bossuyt PM, McInnes MDF. Barriers to reporting guideline adherence in point-of-care ultrasound research: a cross-sectional survey of authors and journal editors. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021:bmjebm-2020-111604. [PMID: 33483335 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111604] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Chapman SJ, Drake TM, Bolton WS, Barnard J, Bhangu A. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals. Br J Surg 2017;104:198-204. [PMID: 28001294 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10423] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Mahady SE, Schlub T, Bero L, Moher D, Tovey D, George J, Craig JC. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2015;68:144-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.016] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Farid-Kapadia M, Askie L, Hartling L, Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Bhutta ZA, Soll R, Moher D, Offringa M. Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? BMC Pediatr 2017;17:57. [PMID: 28260530 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0812-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 Li G, Jin Y, Mbuagbaw L, Dolovich L, Adachi JD, Levine MA, Cook D, Samaan Z, Thabane L. Enhancing research publications and advancing scientific writing in health research collaborations: sharing lessons learnt from the trenches. J Multidiscip Healthc 2018;11:245-54. [PMID: 29844676 DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S152681] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Frank RA, Mcinnes MDF, Levine D, Kressel HY, Jesurum JS, Petrcich W, Mcgrath TA, Bossuyt PM. Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of “Truth” in Imaging Research? Radiology 2018;287:215-23. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170586] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
52 Sandoval JA, Fernandez-pineda I, Malkan AD. Risk-reduction surgery in pediatric surgical oncology: A perspective. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2016;51:675-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.01.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
53 Farid-Kapadia M, Joachim KC, Balasingham C, Clyburne-Sherin A, Offringa M. Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2017;6:31. [PMID: 28260528 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0423-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
54 Mahtta D, Altibi A, Gad MM, Samara A, Barakat AF, Bagur R, Mansoor H, Jneid H, Virani SS, Mamas MA, Masri A, Elgendy IY. Methodological Rigor and Temporal Trends of Cardiovascular Medicine Meta-Analyses in Highest-Impact Journals. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e021367. [PMID: 34533035 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021367] [Reference Citation Analysis]
55 Balcerak G, Shepard S, Ottwell R, Arthur W, Hartwell M, Beaman J, Lu K, Zhu L, Wright DN, Vassar M. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies on opioid use disorder. Subst Abus 2021;:1-9. [PMID: 33848450 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1904092] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
56 Lee SY, Sagoo H, Farwana R, Whitehurst K, Fowler A, Agha R. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17:178. [PMID: 29281981 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0450-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
57 McGrath TA, Alabousi M, Skidmore B, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PMM, Moher D, Thombs B, McInnes MDF. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6:194. [PMID: 29017574 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58] [Article Influence: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
58 Mcinnes MD, Lim CS, van der Pol CB, Salameh J, Mcgrath TA, Frank RA. Reporting Guidelines for Imaging Research. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2019;49:121-35. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
59 Nawijn F, Ham WHW, Houwert RM, Groenwold RHH, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DPJ. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement. BMC Emerg Med 2019;19:19. [PMID: 30744570 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-019-0233-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
60 Torp-Pedersen C, Goette A, Nielsen PB, Potpara T, Fauchier L, John Camm A, Arbelo E, Boriani G, Skjoeth F, Rumsfeld J, Masoudi F, Guo Y, Joung B, Refaat MM, Kim YH, Albert CM, Piccini J, Avezum A, Lip GYH; External Reviewers. 'Real-world' observational studies in arrhythmia research: data sources, methodology, and interpretation. A position document from European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific HRS (APHRS), and Latin America HRS (LAHRS). Europace 2020;22:831-2. [PMID: 31725156 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz210] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
61 Campbell JM, Kavanagh S, Kurmis R, Munn Z. Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse. J Burn Care Res 2017;38:e552-67. [PMID: 28253213 DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000409] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
62 Papageorgiou SN, Biondi-zoccai G. Designing the Review. In: Biondi-zoccai G, editor. Umbrella Reviews. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 57-80. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_5] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
63 Wasiak J, Shen AY, Ware R, O'Donohoe TJ, Faggion CM Jr. Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017;42:852-6. [PMID: 28610464 DOI: 10.1177/1753193417712660] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
64 Park JY, Lee KH, Ku YJ, Cho SG, Kim YJ, Lee HY, Kim JH. Characteristics, Trends, and Quality of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in General Radiology between 2007 and 2015. Academic Radiology 2017;24:1013-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.02.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
65 Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, Mayhew A, Skidmore B, Stevens A, Boutron I, Sarkis-Onofre R, Bjerre LM, Hróbjartsson A, Altman DG, Moher D. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev 2017;6:131. [PMID: 28720117 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0527-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 81] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71] [Article Influence: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
66 De Robertis E, Afshari A, Longrois D. The quest for the holy volume therapy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016;33:483-7. [PMID: 27270704 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000441] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
67 Jin Y, Sanger N, Shams I, Luo C, Shahid H, Li G, Bhatt M, Zielinski L, Bantoto B, Wang M, Abbade LP, Nwosu I, Leenus A, Mbuagbaw L, Maaz M, Chang Y, Sun G, Levine MA, Adachi JD, Thabane L, Samaan Z. Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update. J Multidiscip Healthc 2018;11:495-510. [PMID: 30310289 DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S155103] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
68 Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, Mayhew A, Skidmore B, Stevens A, Boutron I, Sarkis-Onofre R, Bjerre LM, Hróbjartsson A, Altman DG, Moher D. Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study. Syst Rev 2017;6:117. [PMID: 28629396 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
69 Yaxley KL, To MS. The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis. Insights Imaging 2020;11:123. [PMID: 33226503 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00936-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
70 Jiang Q, Liu Q, Chen F, Zeng X, Song F, Lu Z, Cao S. Reporting quality and statistical analysis of published dose-response meta-analyses was suboptimal: a cross-sectional literature survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;115:133-40. [PMID: 31326542 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
71 Peters JP, Hooft L, Grolman W, Stegeman I. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136540. [PMID: 26317406 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136540] [Cited by in Crossref: 48] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41] [Article Influence: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
72 Pieper D, Buechter RB, Li L, Prediger B, Eikermann M. Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:574-583. [PMID: 25638457 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96] [Article Influence: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
73 Liu H, Zhou X, Yu G, Sun X. The effects of the PRISMA statement to improve the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of nursing interventions for patients with heart failure. Int J Nurs Pract 2019;25:e12729. [DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12729] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
74 Zhang L, Gerson L, Maluf-filho F. Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018;88:139-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
75 Katsura M, Kuriyama A, Tada M, Tsujimoto Y, Luo Y, Yamamoto K, So R, Aga M, Matsushima K, Fukuma S, Furukawa TA. High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study. Br J Surg 2021;108:1521-9. [PMID: 34791075 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab328] [Reference Citation Analysis]
76 Campbell JM. Quality of systematic reviews is poor, our fault, our responsibility. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017;15:1977-8. [PMID: 28800043 DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003552] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
77 Blanco D, Altman D, Moher D, Boutron I, Kirkham JJ, Cobo E. Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026589. [PMID: 31076472 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026589] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
78 McGrath TA, McInnes MDF, Langer FW, Hong J, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PMM. Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studies. Eur J Radiol 2017;93:59-64. [PMID: 28668432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.032] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
79 Li G, Mbuagbaw L, Samaan Z, Jin Y, Nwosu I, Levine MA, Adachi JD, Thabane L. State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014749. [PMID: 28360252 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014749] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
80 Brand J, Hardy R, Monroe E. Research Pearls: Checklists and Flowcharts to Improve Research Quality. Arthroscopy 2020;36:2030-8. [PMID: 32169662 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.046] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
81 Hong PJ, Korevaar DA, Mcgrath TA, Ziai H, Frank R, Alabousi M, Bossuyt PM, Mcinnes MD. Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015: Completeness of Reporting of Imaging Research. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;47:523-44. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25797] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
82 Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, Coriat AM, Foeger N, Dirnagl U. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol 2020;18:e3000737. [PMID: 32673304 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
83 Yerokhin VV, Carr BK, Sneed G, Vassar M. Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals. BMC Res Notes 2016;9:475. [PMID: 27769265 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2280-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
84 Moher D, Avey M, Antes G, Altman DG. The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research. BMC Med 2015;13:34. [PMID: 25775278 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0284-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
85 Rainkie DC, Abedini ZS, Abdelkader NN. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review. PLoS One 2020;15:e0243091. [PMID: 33326429 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243091] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
86 Leclercq V, Beaudart C, Ajamieh S, Rabenda V, Tirelli E, Bruyère O. Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;115:46-54. [PMID: 31254618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
87 McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM; and the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford T, Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Hooft L, Hunt HA, Hyde CJ, Korevaar DA, Leeflang MMG, Macaskill P, Reitsma JB, Rodin R, Rutjes AWS, Salameh JP, Stevens A, Takwoingi Y, Tonelli M, Weeks L, Whiting P, Willis BH. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018;319:388-396. [PMID: 29362800 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163] [Cited by in Crossref: 766] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 711] [Article Influence: 191.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
88 Jacobsen SM, Douglas A, Smith CA, Roberts W, Ottwell R, Oglesby B, Yasler C, Torgerson T, Hartwell M, Vassar M. Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2021;127:905-16. [PMID: 34548174 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.016] [Reference Citation Analysis]
89 Huang EP, Wang XF, Choudhury KR, McShane LM, Gönen M, Ye J, Buckler AJ, Kinahan PE, Reeves AP, Jackson EF, Guimaraes AR, Zahlmann G; Meta-Analysis Working Group. Meta-analysis of the technical performance of an imaging procedure: guidelines and statistical methodology. Stat Methods Med Res 2015;24:141-74. [PMID: 24872353 DOI: 10.1177/0962280214537394] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
90 Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Tricco AC, Catalá-López F, Li L, Reid EK, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moher D. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002028. [PMID: 27218655 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028] [Cited by in Crossref: 306] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 280] [Article Influence: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
91 Page MJ, Altman DG, Shamseer L, McKenzie JE, Ahmadzai N, Wolfe D, Yazdi F, Catalá-López F, Tricco AC, Moher D. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;94:8-18. [PMID: 29113936 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
92 Page MJ, Moher D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Syst Rev 2017;6:263. [PMID: 29258593 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 139] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 130] [Article Influence: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
93 Yang M, Jiang L, Wang A, Xu G. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals: Quality assessment. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2017;23:e12498. [DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12498] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
94 Chaimani A, Ravaud P. Closing the Gap between Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews and Reporting Guidelines: The PRISMA-Diagnostic Test Accuracy Statement. Clin Chem 2019;65:222-4. [PMID: 30504260 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.296749] [Reference Citation Analysis]
95 Zhu Y, Fan L, Zhang H, Wang M, Mei X, Hou J, Shi Z, Shuai Y, Shen Y. Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157808. [PMID: 27336624 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157808] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
96 Dilauro M, Mcinnes MDF, Korevaar DA, van der Pol CB, Petrcich W, Walther S, Quon J, Kurowecki D, Bossuyt PMM. Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate? Radiology 2016;280:62-7. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151384] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
97 Chow R, Huang E, Li A, Li S, Fu SY, Son JS, Foster WG. Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:18. [PMID: 33407226 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03496-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
98 Ji J, Zhang H, Xu D, Zhang T, Kong D, Xiao G, Cao Z, Wang F, Gao X, Sun YH. Replicate systematic review and meta-analyses on robotic surgery: a quality appraisal and overlap investigation. Surg Endosc 2020;34:384-95. [PMID: 30972621 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06780-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
99 Henderson AH, Upile T, Pilavakis Y, Patel NN. Reporting guidelines and journal quality in otolaryngology. Clin Otolaryngol 2016;41:461-6. [PMID: 26412303 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12546] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
100 Mcgrath TA, Bowdridge JC, Prager R, Frank RA, Treanor L, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Salameh J, Leeflang M, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM, Mcinnes MDF. Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High–Impact Factor Journals. Clinical Chemistry 2020;66:915-24. [DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa093] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
101 Tam WWS, Tang A, Woo B, Goh SYS. Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026271. [PMID: 31005930 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026271] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
102 Li Q, Li L, Wang R, Zou K, Tian R, Sun X. Methodological quality of systematic reviews used in clinical practice guidelines: focus on clinical imaging. Clin Transl Imaging 2021;9:373-82. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00433-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
103 Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:617-26. [PMID: 25766056 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 102] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87] [Article Influence: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
104 Zuckier LS. Evidence-Based Medicine in the Domain of Nuclear Medicine, the Fifty-Year View. Semin Nucl Med 2020;50:110-4. [PMID: 31843058 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.07.007] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
105 Kwakkenbos L, Juszczak E, Hemkens LG, Sampson M, Fröbert O, Relton C, Gale C, Zwarenstein M, Langan SM, Moher D, Boutron I, Ravaud P, Campbell MK, Mc Cord KA, van Staa TP, Thabane L, Uher R, Verkooijen HM, Benchimol EI, Erlinge D, Sauvé M, Torgerson D, Thombs BD. Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data. Res Integr Peer Rev 2018;3:9. [PMID: 30397513 DOI: 10.1186/s41073-018-0053-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
106 Frank RA, Bossuyt PM, McInnes MDF. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. Radiology 2018;289:313-4. [PMID: 30015590 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180850] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
107 Prager R, Bowdridge J, Kareemi H, Wright C, McGrath TA, McInnes MDF. Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e203871. [PMID: 32356885 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3871] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
108 Haber SL, Fairman KA, Sclar DA. Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews. Pharmacotherapy 2015;35:1077-87. [PMID: 26598099 DOI: 10.1002/phar.1657] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]