BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Fatahi M, Reddig A, Vijayalaxmi, Friebe B, Hartig R, Prihoda TJ, Ricke J, Roggenbuck D, Reinhold D, Speck O. DNA double-strand breaks and micronuclei in human blood lymphocytes after repeated whole body exposures to 7T Magnetic Resonance Imaging. NeuroImage 2016;133:288-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.023] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Hartwig V, Virgili G, Mattei FE, Biagini C, Romeo S, Zeni O, Scarfì MR, Massa R, Campanella F, Landini L, Gobba F, Modenese A, Giovannetti G. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance. Med Biol Eng Comput 2021. [PMID: 34586563 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02435-6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Wang S, Zheng M, Lou C, Chen S, Guo H, Gao Y, Lv H, Yuan X, Zhang X, Shang P. Evaluating the biological safety on mice at 16 T static magnetic field with 700 MHz radio-frequency electromagnetic field. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021;230:113125. [PMID: 34971997 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113125] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Budinger TF, Bird MD. MRI and MRS of the human brain at magnetic fields of 14 T to 20 T: Technical feasibility, safety, and neuroscience horizons. NeuroImage 2018;168:509-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.067] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Ladd ME, Bachert P, Meyerspeer M, Moser E, Nagel AM, Norris DG, Schmitter S, Speck O, Straub S, Zaiss M. Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2018;109:1-50. [PMID: 30527132 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 127] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99] [Article Influence: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Martin O, Schaarschmidt BM, Kirchner J, Suntharalingam S, Grueneisen J, Demircioglu A, Heusch P, Quick HH, Forsting M, Antoch G, Herrmann K, Umutlu L. PET/MRI Versus PET/CT for Whole-Body Staging: Results from a Single-Center Observational Study on 1,003 Sequential Examinations. J Nucl Med 2020;61:1131-6. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233940] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Hansson Mild K, Lundström R, Wilén J. Non-Ionizing Radiation in Swedish Health Care-Exposure and Safety Aspects. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:E1186. [PMID: 30987016 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071186] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Wilén J, Olsrud J, Frankel J, Hansson Mild K. Valid Exposure Protocols Needed in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Genotoxic Research. Bioelectromagnetics 2020;41:247-57. [PMID: 32157722 DOI: 10.1002/bem.22257] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Fatahi M, Reddig A, Friebe B, Reinhold D, Speck O. MRI and Genetic Damage: An Update. Curr Radiol Rep 2017;5. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-017-0216-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Jalali AH, Mozdarani H, Ghanaati H. The genotoxic effects of contrast enhanced abdominopelvic 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging on human circulating leucocytes. Eur J Radiol 2020;129:109037. [PMID: 32446124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109037] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Fasshauer M, Krüwel T, Zapf A, Stahnke VC, Rave-fränk M, Staab W, Sohns JM, Steinmetz M, Unterberg-buchwald C, Schuster A, Ritter C, Lotz J. Absence of DNA double-strand breaks in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging assessed by γH2AX flow cytometry. Eur Radiol 2018;28:1149-56. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5056-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Burgos-molina AM, Mercado-sáenz S, Sendra-portero F, Ruiz-gómez MJ. Effect of low frequency magnetic field on efficiency of chromosome break repair. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 2020;39:30-7. [DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2019.1685541] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Fagan AJ, Bitz AK, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Collins CM, Kimbrell V, Raaijmakers AJE; ISMRM Safety Committee. 7T MR Safety. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;53:333-46. [PMID: 32830900 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27319] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Frankel J, Wilén J, Hansson Mild K. Assessing Exposures to Magnetic Resonance Imaging's Complex Mixture of Magnetic Fields for In Vivo, In Vitro, and Epidemiologic Studies of Health Effects for Staff and Patients. Front Public Health 2018;6:66. [PMID: 29594090 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00066] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Budinger TF, Bird MD, Frydman L, Long JR, Mareci TH, Rooney WD, Rosen B, Schenck JF, Schepkin VD, Sherry AD, Sodickson DK, Springer CS, Thulborn KR, Uğurbil K, Wald LL. Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale. MAGMA 2016;29:617-39. [PMID: 27194154 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0561-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 39] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Friebe B, Godenschweger F, Fatahi M, Speck O, Roggenbuck D, Reinhold D, Reddig A. The potential toxic impact of different gadolinium-based contrast agents combined with 7-T MRI on isolated human lymphocytes. Eur Radiol Exp 2018;2:40. [PMID: 30483972 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-018-0069-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Jalali AH, Mozdarani H, Ghanaati H. The Effect of Contrast Enhanced Abdominopelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Expression and Methylation Level of ATM and AKT Genes. Cell J 2021;23:335-40. [PMID: 34308577 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2021.7258] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Reddig A, Fatahi M, Roggenbuck D, Ricke J, Reinhold D, Speck O, Friebe B. Impact of in Vivo High-Field-Strength and Ultra-High-Field-Strength MR Imaging on DNA Double-Strand-Break Formation in Human Lymphocytes. Radiology 2017;282:782-9. [PMID: 27689924 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160794] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Hosono M, Takenaka M, Monzen H, Tamura M, Kudo M, Nishimura Y. Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET/CT examinations. Br J Radiol 2021;:20210388. [PMID: 34111964 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210388] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Ekins JB, Tin AS, Costes S, Hudson TM, Schroeder DJ, Kallmes K, Kaufmann SH, Young PM, Lu A, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR exams of human subjects are associated with significant increases in the DNA repair marker 53BP1, but not the damage marker γH2AX. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190890. [PMID: 29309426 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190890] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Hill MA. Cardiac MR imaging genotoxicity? Eur Heart J 2018;39:313-5. [PMID: 29281062 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx719] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Fagan AJ, Amrami KK, Welker KM, Frick MA, Felmlee JP, Watson RE Jr. Magnetic Resonance Safety in the 7T Environment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2020;28:573-82. [PMID: 33040997 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2020.07.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]