BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Wengert GJ, Pipan F, Almohanna J, Bickel H, Polanec S, Kapetas P, Clauser P, Pinker K, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2020;30:1451-9. [PMID: 31797077 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06444-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Baltzer PAT. Supplemental screening using breast MRI in women with mammographically dense breasts. Eur J Radiol 2021;136:109513. [PMID: 33422397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109513] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Istomin A, Masarwah A, Okuma H, Sutela A, Vanninen R, Sudah M. A multiparametric classification system for lesions detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. European Journal of Radiology 2020;132:109322. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109322] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Istomin A, Masarwah A, Vanninen R, Okuma H, Sudah M. Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score for characterizing lesions on breast MRI with comparison to a multiparametric classification system. Eur J Radiol 2021;138:109659. [PMID: 33752000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109659] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Jajodia A, Sindhwani G, Pasricha S, Prosch H, Puri S, Dewan A, Batra U, Doval DC, Mehta A, Chaturvedi AK. Application of the Kaiser score to increase diagnostic accuracy in equivocal lesions on diagnostic mammograms referred for MR mammography. Eur J Radiol 2021;134:109413. [PMID: 33290973 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109413] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Fueger BJ, Clauser P, Kapetas P, Pötsch N, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT. Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2021;56:53-60. [PMID: 33618160 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Grippo C, Jagmohan P, Helbich TH, Kapetas P, Clauser P, Baltzer PAT. Correct determination of the enhancement curve is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis using the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI. Eur J Radiol 2021;138:109630. [PMID: 33744507 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109630] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Milos RI, Pipan F, Kalovidouri A, Clauser P, Kapetas P, Bernathova M, Helbich TH, Baltzer PAT. The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening exams. Eur Radiol 2020;30:6052-61. [PMID: 32504098 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06945-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Yang X, Dong M, Li S, Chai R, Zhang Z, Li N, Zhang L. Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2020;30:4795-805. [PMID: 32350660 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 van der Hoogt KJJ, Schipper RJ, Winter-Warnars GA, Ter Beek LC, Loo CE, Mann RM, Beets-Tan RGH. Factors affecting the value of diffusion-weighted imaging for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2021;12:187. [PMID: 34921645 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01123-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 An Y, Mao G, Ao W, Mao F, Zhang H, Cheng Y, Yang G. Can DWI provide additional value to Kaiser score in evaluation of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2022. [PMID: 35357535 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08674-x] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Pötsch N, Dietzel M, Kapetas P, Clauser P, Pinker K, Ellmann S, Uder M, Helbich T, Baltzer PAT. An A.I. classifier derived from 4D radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI data: potential to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5866-76. [PMID: 33744990 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07787-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Meng L, Zhao X, Lu L, Xing Q, Wang K, Guo Y, Shang H, Chen Y, Huang M, Sun Y, Zhang X. A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value. Front Oncol 2021;11:779642. [PMID: 34926290 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779642] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Dietzel M, Krug B, Clauser P, Burke C, Hellmich M, Maintz D, Uder M, Bickel H, Helbich T, Baltzer PAT. A Multicentric Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping and the Kaiser Score in the Assessment of Breast Lesions. Invest Radiol 2021;56:274-82. [PMID: 33122603 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000739] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]