BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: van Gijn-grosvenor EL, Lamb ME. Behavioural Differences Between Online Sexual Groomers Approaching Boys and Girls. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 2016;25:577-96. [DOI: 10.1080/10538712.2016.1189473] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Gámez-guadix M, De Santisteban P, Alcazar MÁ. The Construction and Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire for Online Sexual Solicitation and Interaction of Minors With Adults. Sex Abuse 2018;30:975-91. [DOI: 10.1177/1079063217724766] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Broome LJ, Izura C, Lorenzo-dus N. A systematic review of fantasy driven vs. contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies? Child Abuse & Neglect 2018;79:434-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.021] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 de Santisteban P, Del Hoyo J, Alcázar-Córcoles MÁ, Gámez-Guadix M. Progression, maintenance, and feedback of online child sexual grooming: A qualitative analysis of online predators. Child Abuse Negl 2018;80:203-15. [PMID: 29625326 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.026] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Seymour‐smith S, Kloess JA. A discursive analysis of compliance, resistance and escalation to threats in sexually exploitative interactions between offenders and male children. Br J Soc Psychol 2021;60:988-1011. [DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12437] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Lavoie J, Dickerson KL, Redlich AD, Quas JA. Overcoming Disclosure Reluctance in Youth Victims of Sex Trafficking: New Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice. Psychol Public Policy Law 2019;25:225-38. [PMID: 32103880 DOI: 10.1037/law0000205] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Díaz Cárdenas S, Arrieta Vergara K, Simancas-Pallares M. Internet Addiction and Academic Performance in Dental Students. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) 2019;48:198-207. [PMID: 31779870 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcp.2018.03.002] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Gámez-guadix M, Almendros C, Calvete E, De Santisteban P. Persuasion strategies and sexual solicitations and interactions in online sexual grooming of adolescents: Modeling direct and indirect pathways. Journal of Adolescence 2018;63:11-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Joleby M, Lunde C, Landström S, Jonsson LS. Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity. Child Abuse Negl 2021;120:105214. [PMID: 34303993 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Greco C. On the Quebec Judiciary and Phenomenon of Online Child Luring. Can Rev Sociol 2019;56:78-92. [PMID: 30740925 DOI: 10.1111/cars.12231] [Reference Citation Analysis]