Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Crit Care Med. Feb 4, 2014; 3(1): 24-33
Published online Feb 4, 2014. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i1.24
Table 2 Summary of studies comparing isotonic saline to balanced crystalloid solutions
StudyDesignPopulationSolutionsOutcome
McFarlane et al[59]RCTElective hepatobiliary/pancreatic surgery0.9% saline vs PL-148Iatrogenic metabolic acidosis with 0.9% saline
Wilkes et al[47]RCTMajor abdominal surgery0.9% saline vs Hartmann's (in HES)Iatrogenic metabolic acidosis with 0.9% saline
O'Malley et al[48]RCTKidney transplant recipients0.9% saline vs RLIatrogenic metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia with 0.9% saline
Yunos et al[56]Prospective before-and-afterCritically ill patientsChloride-rich vs chloride-poor fluid strategyMore acidosis with chloride-rich; more alkalosis and reduced cost with chloride-poor
Chowdbury et al[26]RCT (cross-over)Healthy volunteers0.9% saline vs PL-148 (2 L infusion)↑Δ [Cl-]; ↑ Strong ion difference; ↓ RBF; ↑ weight gain; ↑ extravascular volume; ↑ time to micturation
Chua et al[49]RetrospectiveCritically ill with DKA0.9% saline vs PL-148More rapid resolution of acidosis with PL-148
Shaw et al[55]RetrospectiveMajor abdominal surgery0.9% saline vs PL-148↑ Major infection; ↑ composite of complications; ↑ blood transfusions; and ↑ RRT with 0.9% saline
Yunos et al[57]Prospective before-and-afterCritically ill patientsChloride-rich vs chloride-poor fluid strategy↑ AKI (KDIGO stage II/III); ↑ RRT with chloride-rich strategy