BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Tuncer AA, Erten EEA. Examination of short and long term complications of thermocautery, plastic clamping, and surgical circumcision techniques. Pak J Med Sci 2017;33:1418-23. [PMID: 29492070 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.336.13640] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Akyüz O, Tatar Z. Is it safe to use a thermocautery device for circumcision? Examination of the histopathological changes emerging after thermocautery-assisted circumcisions. Andrologia 2021;53:e13968. [PMID: 33421180 DOI: 10.1111/and.13968] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Micoogullari U, Yildirim M, Gol IH, Cakici OU. Comparison of NeoAlis™ disposable circumcision device and sleeve technique in circumcision: Results from a referral health-care center in Turkey. J Pediatr Urol 2021:S1477-5131(21)00455-1. [PMID: 34696964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.09.019] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Cakiroglu B, Gozukucuk A, Arda E, Tas T. Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status. Ther Adv Urol 2019;11:1756287219882598. [PMID: 31662793 DOI: 10.1177/1756287219882598] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]