BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Ng C. The effect of age on outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for renal stones: . Current Opinion in Urology 2009;19:211-4. [DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16b7] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Ichiyanagi O, Nagaoka A, Izumi T, Kawamura Y, Kato T. Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 2015;43:419-26. [PMID: 25981235 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0783-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Gökce Mİ, Akpinar Ç, Obaid K, Süer E, Gülpinar Ö, Bedük Y. Comparison of retrograde ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous anterograde ureteroscopy for removal of impacted upper ureteral stones >10mm in the elderly population. Int Braz J Urol 2021;47:64-70. [PMID: 32840338 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0638] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Philippou P, Lamrani D, Moraitis K, Bach C, Masood J, Buchholz N. Is shock wave lithotripsy efficient for the elderly stone formers? Results of a matched-pair analysis. Urol Res 2012;40:299-304. [PMID: 21901557 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0424-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Krambeck AE, Lieske JC, Li X, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Rule AD. Effect of age on the clinical presentation of incident symptomatic urolithiasis in the general population. J Urol 2013;189:158-64. [PMID: 23164393 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.023] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Karakaş HB, Çiçekbilek İ, Tok A, Alışkan T, Akduman B. Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications based on ASA risks in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Turk J Urol 2016;42:162-7. [PMID: 27635291 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.78545] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Gupta R, Mahajan A. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly versus young patients under regional anesthesia: A comparative study. Urol Ann 2020;12:254-8. [PMID: 33100751 DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_69_19] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 . Bibliography: Current world literature. Female urology. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:343-6. [PMID: 20531093 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833bd73a] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Freitas Junior CH, Mazzucchi E, Danilovic A, Brito AH, Srougi M. Metabolic assessment of elderly men with urolithiasis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67:457-61. [PMID: 22666789 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)09] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 . Current world literature. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:178-84. [PMID: 20124791 DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283372598] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Wagenius M, Oddason K, Utter M, Popiolek M, Forsvall A, Lundström K, Linder A. Factors influencing stone-free rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2055137] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Elbir F, Başıbüyük İ, Topaktaş R, Kardaş S, Tosun M, Tepeler A, Armağan A. Flexible ureterorenoscopy results: Analysis of 279 cases. Turk J Urol 2015;41:113-8. [PMID: 26516593 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.81488] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Philippou P, Lamrani D, Moraitis K, Wazait H, Masood J, Buchholz N. Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations. Arab J Urol 2011;9:29-33. [PMID: 26579264 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Mohamad Al-Ali B, Pummer K. Large stone clearance in 2-year-old child with staghorn and calyceal stones using SWL monotherapy. Cent European J Urol 2012;65:28-9. [PMID: 24578919 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2012.01.art8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]