BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Pieper D, Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Büchter RB, Hartling L. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017;6:73. [PMID: 28388960 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0468-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Faggion CM, Diaz KT. Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;109:70-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.004] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Bougioukas KI, Bouras E, Apostolidou-kiouti F, Kokkali S, Arvanitidou M, Haidich A. Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;106:70-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge. Syst Rev 2017;6:185. [PMID: 28886726 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0582-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 54] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47] [Article Influence: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Krnic Martinic M, Pieper D, Glatt A, Puljak L. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019;19:203. [PMID: 31684874 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Gates M, Gates A, Guitard S, Pollock M, Hartling L. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review. Syst Rev 2020;9:254. [PMID: 33148319 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01509-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Pieper D, Tricco AC, Gates M, Gates A, Hartling L. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst Rev 2019;8:335. [PMID: 31870434 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1252-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research. Br J Nutr 2019;122:1279-94. [PMID: 31478479 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114519002241] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Büchter RB, Weise A, Pieper D. Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21:240. [PMID: 34742231 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01438-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Zomahoun HTV, Massougbodji J, Bussières A, Thomas A, Kairy D, Uwizeye CB, Rheault N, Charif AB, Diendéré E, Langlois L, Tchoubi S, Gaye SA, Légaré F. Improving the usefulness of evidence concerning the effectiveness of implementation strategies for knowledge products in primary healthcare: protocol for a series of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2020;9:112. [PMID: 32430005 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01382-x] [Reference Citation Analysis]