BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Lim DH, Keum JE, Ju WK, Lee JH, Chung TY, Chung ES. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg 2013;29:462-8. [PMID: 23820228 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-04] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Tay E, Bajpai R. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout compared to change in axial length measurements with the IOLMaster. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258:917-24. [PMID: 31773250 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04529-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Jun I, Kang DSY, Roberts CJ, Lee H, Jean SK, Kim EK, Seo KY, Kim TI. Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021;10:15. [PMID: 34259803 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.8.15] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Huhtala A, Pietilä J, Mäkinen P, Uusitalo H. Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:393-404. [PMID: 27022236 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S99394] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Wu, Li B, Huang M, Fang X. Influence of Cap Thickness on Opaque Bubble Layer Formation in SMILE: 110 Versus 140 µm. J Refract Surg 2020;36:592-6. [PMID: 32901826 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20200720-02] [Reference Citation Analysis]