BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Shah S, Murdoch IE. NICE - impact on glaucoma case detection. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31:339-342. [PMID: 21545475 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00843.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Khan S, Clarke J, Kotecha A. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:472-7. [PMID: 23009293 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00943.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Kotecha A, Brookes J, Foster PJ. A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals. Eye (Lond) 2017;31:899-905. [PMID: 28211881 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.9] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Jones PR, Lindfield D, Crabb DP. Using an open-source tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) as a rapid triage measure for glaucoma clinic waiting areas. Br J Ophthalmol 2021;105:681-6. [PMID: 32747334 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316018] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Barrett C, O'brien C, Butler JS, Loughman J. Barriers to glaucoma case finding as perceived by optometrists in Ireland. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 2018;101:90-9. [DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12573] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, French K, Kean J, Chang L, Parker M, Garway-heath DF, Bourne RR. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013;33:183-9. [DOI: 10.1111/opo.12029] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Connor AJ, Fraser SG. Glaucoma prescribing trends in England 2000 to 2012. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:863-9. [PMID: 24858531 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.114] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 de Silva SR, Riaz Y, Purbrick RM, Salmon JF. There is a trend for the diagnosis of glaucoma to be made at an earlier stage in 2010 compared to 2008 in Oxford, United Kingdom. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013;33:179-82. [DOI: 10.1111/opo.12030] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Dabasia PL, Edgar DF, Garway-Heath DF, Lawrenson JG. A survey of current and anticipated use of standard and specialist equipment by UK optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014;34:592-613. [PMID: 25160893 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12150] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Formichella P, Annoh R, Zeri F, Tatham AJ. The role of the disc damage likelihood scale in glaucoma detection by community optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020;40:752-9. [PMID: 32946144 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12734] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, Vernon SA, Fenerty C, Henson D, Spencer F, Wang Y, Harper R, McNaught A, Collins L, Parker M, Lawrenson J, Hudson R, Khaw PT, Wormald R, Garway-Heath D, Bourne R. The effectiveness of schemes that refine referrals between primary and secondary care--the UK experience with glaucoma referrals: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways Project. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002715. [PMID: 23878172 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002715] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Founti P, Topouzis F, Holló G, Cvenkel B, Iester M, Haidich AB, Kóthy P, Kiana A, Kolokotroni D, Viswanathan AC. Prospective study of glaucoma referrals across Europe: are we using resources wisely? Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:329-37. [PMID: 28774936 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310249] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Sii S, Nasser A, Loo CY, Croghan C, Rotchford A, Agarwal PK. The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol 2019;103:369-73. [DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311429] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Huang J, Yapp M, Hennessy MP, Ly A, Masselos K, Agar A, Kalloniatis M, Zangerl B. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia. Clin Exp Optom 2020;103:675-83. [PMID: 31852027 DOI: 10.1111/cxo.13030] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Boodhna T, Crabb DP. Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015;35:225-30. [PMID: 25545852 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12187] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Kotecha A, Turner S, Vasilakis C, Utley M, Fulop N, Azuara-Blanco A, Foster PJ. Improving care and increasing efficiency-challenges in the care of chronic eye diseases. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:779-83. [PMID: 25008575 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.135] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Heng JS, Wormald R, Khaw PT. Geographical variation in glaucoma prescribing trends in England 2008-2012: an observational ecological study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010429. [PMID: 27188806 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010429] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Gunn PJG, Marks JR, Konstantakopoulou E, Edgar DF, Lawrenson JG, Roberts SA, Spencer AF, Fenerty CH, Harper RA. Clinical effectiveness of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme. Br J Ophthalmol 2019;103:1066-71. [PMID: 30309913 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312385] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Keenan J, Shahid H, Bourne RR, White AJ, Martin KR. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;43:221-7. [PMID: 25070417 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12398] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Barrett C, O'Brien C, Loughman J. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018;38:400-10. [PMID: 29492992 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12446] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Shweikh Y, Ko F, Chan MP, Patel PJ, Muthy Z, Khaw PT, Yip J, Strouthidis N, Foster PJ; UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. Measures of socioeconomic status and self-reported glaucoma in the U.K. Biobank cohort. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:1360-7. [PMID: 26315700 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.157] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, Hibbert P, Alkhawajah S, White A, Jalbert I. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:646. [PMID: 31492128 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4493-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Theodossiades J, Myint J, Murdoch IE, Edgar DF, Lawrenson JG. Does optometrists’ self-reported practice in glaucoma detection predict actual practice as determined by standardised patients?: Can self-reporting predict clinical practice in glaucoma detection? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2012;32:234-41. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00898.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Lawrenson J. Glaucoma: the challenge of early case detection. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013;33:3-6. [DOI: 10.1111/opo.12015] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Harper R. Glaucoma and optometry: recognition, challenges and opportunities: Editorial. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2011;31:327-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00856.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]