BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Cobo-Soriano R, Calvo MA, Beltrán J, Llovet FL, Baviera J. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1357-1365. [PMID: 16105607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.058] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Cheng ZY, He JC, Zhou XT, Chu RY. Effect of flap thickness on higher order wavefront aberrations induced by LASIK: a bilateral study. J Refract Surg 2008;24:524-9. [PMID: 18494346 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080501-11] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Chang JS. Complications of sub-Bowman's keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser in 3009 eyes. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S97-101. [PMID: 18269158 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080101-17] [Cited by in Crossref: 45] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Pfaeffl WA, Kunze M, Zenk U, Pfaeffl MB, Schuster T, Lohmann C. Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2008;34:1872-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.017] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Merchea M. Comparative performance of the Zyoptix XP and Hansatome zero-compression microkeratomes. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2007;33:1386-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Kojima T, Hallak JA, Azar DT. Control-matched analysis of laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in high myopia. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2008;34:544-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.031] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Rocha KM, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg 2011;27:759-63. [PMID: 21853960 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110812-03] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Azar DT, Ghanem RC, de la Cruz J, Hallak JA, Kojima T, Al-Tobaigy FM, Jain S. Thin-flap (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) versus thick-flap laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: case-control analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:2073-2078. [PMID: 19027562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.019] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 . Thin LASIK Flap Creation Using the SCHWIND Carriazo-Pendular Microkeratome. J Refract Surg 2009;25:33-6. [DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20090101-06] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Flanagan GW, Binder PS. Role of flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for refractive undercorrection. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2006;32:1129-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.095] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Ruth AL, Lynn MJ, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Blade source effect on laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness with the Amadeus I microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:407-10. [PMID: 18299064 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.020] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Althomali TA. Reproducibility of flap thickness in sub-Bowman keratomileusis using a mechanical microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1828-33. [PMID: 25261393 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.046] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Ghanem AA, Nematallah EH. Evaluation of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic correction performed under thin flaps. World J Ophthalmol 2011; 1(1): 11-16 [DOI: 10.5318/wjo.v1.i1.11] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Kymionis GD, Tsiklis N, Pallikaris AI, Diakonis V, Hatzithanasis G, Kavroulaki D, Jankov M, Pallikaris IG. Long-term results of superficial laser in situ keratomileusis after ultrathin flap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1276-80. [PMID: 16863961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.054] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Tomita M, Chiba A, Matsuda J, Nawa Y. Evaluation of LASIK treatment with the Femto LDV in patients with corneal opacity. J Refract Surg 2012;28:25-30. [PMID: 22185466 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20111213-01] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Tran DB, Binder PS, Brame CL. LASIK flap revision using the IntraLase femtosecond laser. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2008;48:51-63. [PMID: 18209557 DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e31815eae43] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Bansal AS, Doherty T, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Influence of flap thickness on visual and refractive outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with a mechanical keratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:810-3. [PMID: 20457374 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Townley D, Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:81-5. [PMID: 20070279 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Lim DH, Keum JE, Ju WK, Lee JH, Chung TY, Chung ES. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg 2013;29:462-8. [PMID: 23820228 DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-04] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]