BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Wilsey L, Gowrisankaran S, Cull G, Hardin C, Burgoyne CF, Fortune B. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure. Doc Ophthalmol 2017;134:111-28. [PMID: 28243926 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-017-9578-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Hirooka K, Yokoyama K, Tokumo K, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:649971. [PMID: 33718414 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.649971] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Lee SY, Son NH, Bae HW, Seong GJ, Kim CY. The role of pattern electroretinograms and optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma. Sci Rep 2021;11:12257. [PMID: 34112913 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91813-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Wu Q, Xie M, Chen X, Zhang D, Chen X, Xu K, Hong Y, Zhang C. Temporal contrast adaptation in the analysis of visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022. [PMID: 35294637 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05619-4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Adams CM, Stacy R, Rangaswamy N, Bigelow C, Grosskreutz CL, Prasanna G. Glaucoma - Next Generation Therapeutics: Impossible to Possible. Pharm Res 2018;36:25. [PMID: 30547244 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2557-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Senger C, Moreto R, Watanabe SES, Matos AG, Paula JS. Electrophysiology in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2020;29:147-53. [PMID: 31809397 DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001422] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Dal Monte M, Cammalleri M, Amato R, Pezzino S, Corsaro R, Bagnoli P, Rusciano D. A Topical Formulation of Melatoninergic Compounds Exerts Strong Hypotensive and Neuroprotective Effects in a Rat Model of Hypertensive Glaucoma. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:E9267. [PMID: 33291737 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239267] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Sharif NA. iDrugs and iDevices Discovery Research: Preclinical Assays, Techniques, and Animal Model Studies for Ocular Hypotensives and Neuroprotectants. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2018;34:7-39. [PMID: 29323613 DOI: 10.1089/jop.2017.0125] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Anders F, Liu A, Mann C, Teister J, Lauzi J, Thanos S, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N, Prokosch V. The Small Heat Shock Protein α-Crystallin B Shows Neuroprotective Properties in a Glaucoma Animal Model. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:E2418. [PMID: 29135941 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112418] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Prencipe M, Perossini T, Brancoli G, Perossini M. The photopic negative response (PhNR): measurement approaches and utility in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:3565-76. [PMID: 32737731 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01515-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Spaide RF. Measurable Aspects of the Retinal Neurovascular Unit in Diabetes, Glaucoma, and Controls. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;207:395-409. [PMID: 31078537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.035] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Cvenkel B, Sustar M, Perovšek D. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Doc Ophthalmol 2017;135:17-28. [DOI: 10.1007/s10633-017-9595-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Park JC, Moss HE, McAnany JJ. Electroretinography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison of the pattern ERG and the photopic negative response. Doc Ophthalmol 2018;136:45-55. [PMID: 29139045 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-017-9620-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Ross M, Honig H, Ezra-elia R, Banin E, Obolensky A, Averbukh E, Rosov A, Gootwine E, Ofri R. Consecutive unilateral recording of the two eyes affects dark-adapted ERG responses, when compared to simultaneous bilateral recording. Doc Ophthalmol 2018;137:183-92. [DOI: 10.1007/s10633-018-9661-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]