BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Vestergaard L, Clemmensen OJ, Sørensen FB, Andersen KE. Histological distinction between early allergic and irritant patch test reactions: follicular spongiosis may be characteristic of early allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:207-210. [PMID: 10515099 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06131.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Akaike Y, Morita K, Sakamoto K, Tsushima F, Kayamori K, Maruta N, Yamazaki K, Anzai E, Tonouchi E, Harada H, Ikeda T, Yoda T. Automatic Detection of Spongiosis Associated With Oral Lichenoid Lesions Using Machine Learning. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2022.12.002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Ahlström MG, Johansen JD. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_14] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Lachapelle J, Marot L. Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Marzullo A, Cazzato G, Rossi R. Histological, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Aspects of Contact Dermatitis. Clinical Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Fan W, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Wang L. Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Prevention of Acute Irritant Contact Dermatitis Caused by 2,4-Dichloro-5-Methylpyrimidine. Dermatitis 2021;32:63-7. [PMID: 31688132 DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000540] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Silverberg JI, Guttman-Yassky E, Agner T, Bissonnette R, Cohen DE, Simpson E, Wollenberg A, Thyssen JP. Chronic Hand Eczema Guidelines From an Expert Panel of the International Eczema Council. Dermatitis 2021;32:319-26. [PMID: 32991335 DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000659] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Hindelang B, Aguirre J, Berezhnoi A, He H, Eyerich K, Ntziachristos V, Biedermann T, Darsow U. Optoacoustic mesoscopy shows potential to increase accuracy of allergy patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 2020;83:206-14. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13563] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis 2019;81:227-41. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13327] [Cited by in Crossref: 112] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115] [Article Influence: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Zaaroura H, Bergman R, Nevet MJ. Pigmented Facial Contact Dermatitis to Benzyl Salicylate: A Comparative Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of the Involved Skin and the Positive Patch Test Site. The American Journal of Dermatopathology 2019;41:443-7. [DOI: 10.1097/dad.0000000000001258] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Rajabi‐estarabadi A, Tsang DC, Nouri K, Tosti A. Evaluation of positive patch test reactions using optical coherence tomography: A pilot study. Skin Res Technol 2019;25:625-30. [DOI: 10.1111/srt.12695] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Lachapelle J, Marot L. Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_9-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Ahlström MG, Johansen JD. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_14-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Shin EJ, Seo JK, Lee EJ, Lee ES, Shin MK. Diagnostic utility of skin autofluorescence when patch test results are doubtful. Skin Res Technol 2019;25:96-9. [PMID: 30055047 DOI: 10.1111/srt.12615] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Gru AA, Salavaggione AL. Common spongiotic dermatoses. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology 2017;34:226-36. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2017.02.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Koppes S, Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S, Jakasa I, Franceschi N, Jurakić Tončić R, Marinović B, Brans R, Gibbs S, Frings-dresen M, Rustemeyer T, Kezic S. Stratum corneum profiles of inflammatory mediators in patch test reactions to common contact allergens and sodium lauryl sulfate. Br J Dermatol 2017;176:1533-40. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15163] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Rosa G, Fernandez AP, Vij A, Sood A, Plesec T, Bergfeld WF, Billings SD. Langerhans cell collections, but not eosinophils, are clues to a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis in appropriate skin biopsies: Langerhans cell collections are clues to a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. J Cutan Pathol 2016;43:498-504. [DOI: 10.1111/cup.12707] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Weintraub GS, Lai IN, Kim CN. Review of allergic contact dermatitis: Scratching the surface. World J Dermatol 2015; 4(2): 95-102 [DOI: 10.5314/wjd.v4.i2.95] [Cited by in CrossRef: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Cohen PR. Follicular contact dermatitis revisited: A review emphasizing neomycin-associated follicular contact dermatitis. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(12): 815-821 [PMID: 25516854 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.815] [Cited by in CrossRef: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Suárez-Pérez JA, Bosch R, González S, González E. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of contact dermatitis: Applications of reflectance confocal microscopy. World J Dermatol 2014; 3(3): 45-49 [DOI: 10.5314/wjd.v3.i3.45] [Cited by in CrossRef: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Sardana K. Follicular disorders of the face. Clin Dermatol 2014;32:839-72. [PMID: 25441478 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.02.024] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Ale IS. The Validity of Patch Testing. Patch Testing Tips 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45395-3_4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Wolf R, Orion E, Ruocco V, Baroni A, Ruocco E. Patch testing: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 2013;31:479-86. [PMID: 23806165 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.01.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Proksch E, Brasch J. Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30:335-344. [PMID: 22507049 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.019] [Cited by in Crossref: 63] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Ale IS, Maibach HI. The diagnostic value of patch testing. Dermatotoxicology 2012. [DOI: 10.3109/9781841848570.047] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Thyssen JP. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation - evaluation of a public health intervention. Contact Dermatitis 2011;65:1-68. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01957.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 63] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Lachapelle J, Marot L. Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 167-77. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_9] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 241-51. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_14] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Wilkinson SM, Beck MH. Contact Dermatitis: Irritant. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology 2010. [DOI: 10.1002/9781444317633.ch25] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Zachariae C, Hall B, Cupferman S, Andersen KE, Menne T. ROAT: morphology of ROAT on arm, neck and face in formaldehyde and diazolidinyl urea sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:21-4. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00732.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Zachariae C, Hall B, Cottin M, Cupferman S, Andersen KE, Menne T. Experimental elicitation of contact allergy from a diazolidinyl urea-preserved cream in relation to anatomical region, exposure time and concentration. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:268-77. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00712.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Schuster C, Kranke B, Szolar-platzer C, Aberer W. Macro-video documentation patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:177-83. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00457.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Gambichler T, Moussa G, Sand M, Sand D, Orlikov A, Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K. Correlation between clinical scoring of allergic patch test reactions and optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2005;10:064030. [DOI: 10.1117/1.2141933] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Swindells K, Burnett N, Rius-Diaz F, González E, Mihm MC, González S. Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:220-228. [PMID: 14726876 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.08.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Ale I, Maibach H. Irritant Contact Dermatitis versus Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Dermatotoxicology, Sixth Edition 2004. [DOI: 10.1201/9780203426272.ch13] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Wildemore JK, Junkins-Hopkins JM, James WD. Evaluation of the histologic characteristics of patch test confirmed allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:243-248. [PMID: 12894072 DOI: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)00865-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Nyrén M, Kuzmina N, Emtestam L. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2003;48:394-400. [DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.96] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Martín AP, Ortiz S, Cabalier MED, Frede S, Burgos E, Hliba E, Serra H. Vascular endothelium express CS-1 fibronectin in allergic contact dermatitis: CS-1 fibronectin in ACD. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology 2002;29:347-53. [DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.290604.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 T‐Cell‐Mediated Cytotoxicity. Immunology, Immunopathology, and Immunity 2001. [DOI: 10.1128/9781555818012.ch12] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Andersen KE, Johansen JD, Bruze M, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lepoittevin J, Rastogi S, White I, Menné T. The Time–Dose–Response Relationship for Elicitation of Contact Dermatitis in Isoeugenol Allergic Individuals. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;170:166-71. [DOI: 10.1006/taap.2000.9095] [Cited by in Crossref: 87] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Menné T, Johansen JD, Frosch P. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Man — Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2001. pp. 237-48. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Ale SI, Maibach HI. Irritant Contact Dermatitis ersus Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Chew A, Maibach HI, editors. Irritant Dermatitis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 11-8. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31294-3_2] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans — Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 189-98. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Lachapelle J, Marot L. Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 107-16. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_7] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Reference Citation Analysis]