1 |
Ugoeze KC, Odeku OA. Herbal bioactive–based cosmetics. Herbal Bioactive-Based Drug Delivery Systems 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824385-5.00014-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
2 |
Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Elsner P, Gonçalo M, Naldi L, Schuttelaar MLA, Svedman C, Svensson Å, Ofenloch R. Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II: the EDEN Fragrance Study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35:1692-701. [PMID: 33914959 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17315] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
3 |
Ahlström MG, Johansen JD. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_14] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
4 |
Johansen JD, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J. Contact Allergy to Fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_86] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
5 |
Saquib S, Yadav AK, Prajapati KB. Emerging pollutants in water and human health. Contamination of Water 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824058-8.00008-6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
6 |
Thirunavukkarasu A, Nithya R, Sivashankar R, Sathya AB, Rangabhashiyam S, Pasupathi SA, Prakash M, Nishanth M. Green soap formulation: an insight into the optimization of preparations and antifungal action. Biomass Conv Bioref . [DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-01094-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
7 |
Shah S, Sharma R, Paswan S, Bhandari A, Arukala SR, Pancharathi RK. Prioritizing the Aggregate Source Based on Particle Packing Density Using Modified Toufar Model and MCDM Methods. Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3361-7_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
8 |
Johansen JD, Uter W, Frosch P, Lepoittevin J. Contact Allergy to Fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_86-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
9 |
Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Ofenloch R, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Isaksson M, Naldi L, Schuttelaar M, Svensson Å, Diepgen T. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I. Br J Dermatol 2020;182:955-64. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18224] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
10 |
Ahlström MG, Johansen JD. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_14-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
11 |
Bennike NH, Palangi L, Christensson JB, Nilsson U, Zachariae C, Johansen JD, Hagvall L. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose‐response relationship—A repeated open application test (ROAT) study. Contact Dermatitis 2019;80:208-16. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13168] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
12 |
Mujtaba SF, Srivastav AK, Agnihotry S, Negi S, Upadhayay J, Ray RS. Role of Personal Care Products and Phototoxicity. Photocarcinogenesis & Photoprotection 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5493-8_11] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
13 |
Mowad CM, Anderson B, Scheinman P, Pootongkam S, Nedorost S, Brod B. Allergic contact dermatitis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2016;74:1029-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1139] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54] [Article Influence: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
14 |
Cheng J, Zug KA. Fragrance allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 2014;25:232-45. [PMID: 25207685 DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000067] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
15 |
Yazar K, Lundov M, Faurschou A, Matura M, Boman A, Johansen J, Lidén C. Methylisothiazolinone in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: a repeated open-application study. Br J Dermatol 2015;173:115-22. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13751] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
16 |
Hagi-pavli E, Williams D, Rowland J, Thornhill M, Cruchley A. Characterizing the immunological effects of oral healthcare ingredients using an in vitro reconstructed human epithelial model. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2014;74:139-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.09.007] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
17 |
Mowitz M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions: FALSE-NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO PRE-LOADED FRAGRANCE MIXES. Contact Dermatitis 2014;71:289-94. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12300] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
18 |
Tisserand R, Young R. The skin. Essential Oil Safety. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 69-98. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-443-06241-4.00005-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
19 |
Ale IS. The Validity of Patch Testing. Patch Testing Tips 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45395-3_4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
20 |
Tisserand R, Young R. Constituent profiles. Essential Oil Safety 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-443-06241-4.00014-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
21 |
References. Essential Oil Safety 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-443-06241-4.09996-3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
22 |
Berthaud F, Smith B, Boncheva M. The impact of surface loading and dosing scheme on the skin uptake of fragrances. Toxicol In Vitro 2013;27:2169-74. [PMID: 24041533 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.09.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
23 |
Uter W, Johansen JD, Börje A, Karlberg A, Lidén C, Rastogi S, Roberts D, White IR. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships: FRAGRANCE ALLERGENS IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS. Contact Dermatitis 2013;69:196-230. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12117] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
24 |
Ale IS, Maibach HI. The diagnostic value of patch testing. Dermatotoxicology 2012. [DOI: 10.3109/9781841848570.047] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
25 |
. Zimtaldehyd [MAK Value Documentation in German language, 2003]. The MAK-Collection for Occupational Health and Safety 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/3527600418.mb10455d0037] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
26 |
Silva CR, Oliveira SM, Rossato MF, Dalmolin GD, Guerra GP, da Silveira Prudente A, Cabrini DA, Otuki MF, André E, Ferreira J. The involvement of TRPA1 channel activation in the inflammatory response evoked by topical application of cinnamaldehyde to mice. Life Sci 2011;88:1077-87. [PMID: 21466812 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.03.017] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
27 |
White JML, de Groot AC, White IR. Cosmetics and Skin Care Products. Contact Dermatitis 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_32] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
28 |
Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans: Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 241-51. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_14] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
29 |
Johansen JD, Lepoittevin J. Fragrances. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 607-27. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_33] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
30 |
Lindberg M, Matura M. Patch Testing. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 439-64. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03827-3_24] [Cited by in Crossref: 73] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
31 |
Fischer LA, Voelund A, Andersen KE, Menné T, Johansen JD. The dose-response relationship between the patch test and ROAT and the potential use for regulatory purposes. Contact Dermatitis 2009;61:201-8. [PMID: 19825091 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01607.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
32 |
Cornish K, Williams JL, Kirk M, Teetor VH, Ray DT. ORIGINAL RESEARCH: Evaluation & control of potential sensitizing & irritating chemical components in natural rubber latex extracted from the industrial crop guayule. Industrial Biotechnology 2009;5:245-52. [DOI: 10.1089/ind.2009.5.245] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
33 |
Fischer L, Menné T, Avnstorp C, Kasting G, Johansen J. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. British Journal of Dermatology 2009;161:560-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09256.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
34 |
Zaghi D, Maibach HI. Quantitative relationships between patch test reactivity and use test reactivity: an overview. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 2008;27:241-8. [DOI: 10.1080/15569520802251130] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
35 |
Arts JHE, Mommers C, de Heer C. Dose-Response Relationships and Threshold Levels in Skin and Respiratory Allergy. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2008;36:219-51. [DOI: 10.1080/10408440500534149] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
36 |
Fischer L, Johansen J, Menné T. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. British Journal of Dermatology 2008. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08821.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
37 |
Fischer L, Johansen J, Menné T. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:723-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 67] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
38 |
Api AM, Bredbenner A, Mcgowen M, Niemiera D, Parker L, Renskers K, Selim S, Sgaramella R, Signorelli R, Tedrow S, Troy W. Skin contact transfer of three fragrance residues from candles to human hands. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2007;48:279-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.03.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
39 |
Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation.: Results of the IVDK and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:1-10. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01088.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 182] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 184] [Article Influence: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
40 |
Shaw DW, Maibach HI, Eichenfield LF. Allergic contact dermatitis from pimecrolimus in a patient with tacrolimus allergy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2007;56:342-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.09.033] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
41 |
Schubert H. Skin diseases in workers at a perfume factory. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:81-3. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00881.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
42 |
Wahlberg JE, Lindberg M. Patch Testing. Contact Dermatitis. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_22] [Cited by in Crossref: 101] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 97] [Article Influence: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
43 |
Zachariae C, Hall B, Cupferman S, Andersen KE, Menne T. ROAT: morphology of ROAT on arm, neck and face in formaldehyde and diazolidinyl urea sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:21-4. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00732.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
44 |
Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans — Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. Contact Dermatitis 2006. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
45 |
Johansen JD, Lepoittevin J, Basketter D, Mcfadden J, Søsted H. Allergens of Special Interest. Contact Dermatitis 2006. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_31] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
46 |
White IR, de Groot AC. Cosmetics and Skin Care Products. Contact Dermatitis 2006. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31301-x_30] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
47 |
Cocchiara J, Letizia CS, Lalko J, Lapczynski A, Api AM. Fragrance material review on cinnamaldehyde. Food Chem Toxicol 2005;43:867-923. [PMID: 15811572 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.09.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 93] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
48 |
Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Frosch P, Goossens A, Lepoittevin J, Rastogi SC, White I, Menne T. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:260-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00576.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
49 |
De Smedt AC, Van Den Heuvel RL, Van Tendeloo VF, Berneman ZN, Schoeters GE. Capacity of CD34+ progenitor-derived dendritic cells to distinguish between sensitizers and irritants. Toxicol Lett 2005;156:377-89. [PMID: 15763637 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.12.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
50 |
Schnuch A, Kelterer D, Bauer A, Schuster C, Aberer W, Mahler V, Katzer K, Rakoski J, Jappe U, Krautheim A, Bircher A, Koch P, Worm M, Loffler H, Hillen U, Frosch PJ, Uter W. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:197-206. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00529.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
51 |
Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Thresholds of elicitation depend on induction conditions. Could low level exposure induce sub-clinical allergic states that are only elicited under the severe conditions of clinical diagnosis? Food and Chemical Toxicology 2004;42:1859-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.06.017] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
52 |
Villarama CD, Maibach HI. Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT). Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42:1719-1725. [PMID: 15350669 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
53 |
Kynemund Pedersen L, Agner T, Held E, Johansen J. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in leave-on products elicits contact allergy at low concentration. Br J Dermatol 2004;151:817-22. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06145.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
54 |
Griem P, Goebel C, Scheffler H. Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003;38:269-90. [PMID: 14623479 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.07.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 98] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 97] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
55 |
Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Svedman C, Bruze M, Bernard G, Gimenez-arnau E, Rastogi SC, Lepoittevin J, Menne T. Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose-response elicitation study. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:180-4. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0214.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
56 |
Geier J, Uter W, Pirker C, Frosch PJ. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:99-107. [PMID: 12694214 DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.480209.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
57 |
Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Frosch P, Lepoittevin JP, Rastogi S, Wakelin S, White I, Menné T. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:194-200. [PMID: 12582388 DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.72] [Cited by in Crossref: 44] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
58 |
Cheung C, Hotchkiss SA, Pease CK. Cinnamic compound metabolism in human skin and the role metabolism may play in determining relative sensitisation potency. J Dermatol Sci 2003;31:9-19. [PMID: 12615359 DOI: 10.1016/s0923-1811(02)00139-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 56] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
59 |
Johansen JD. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:789-98. [PMID: 14572300 DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200304110-00006] [Cited by in Crossref: 92] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
60 |
Duus Johansen J. Contact allergy to fragrances: clinical and experimental investigations of the fragrance mix and its ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46 Suppl 3:4-31. [PMID: 11903392 DOI: 10.1046/j.1395-3907.2002.codsupplement.doc.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
61 |
de Groot AC. DERMATOLOGICAL PROBLEMS LINKED TO PERFUMES. Journal of Toxicology: Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 2002;21:265-271. [DOI: 10.1081/cus-120014097] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
62 |
Boukhman MP, Maibach HI. Thresholds in contact sensitization: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans--an overview. Food Chem Toxicol 2001;39:1125-34. [PMID: 11696387 DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00062-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
63 |
Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Felter SP, White IR, Basketter DA. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:333-40. [PMID: 11846748 DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450603.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 132] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
64 |
Jerschow E, Hostýnek JJ, Maibach HI. Allergic contact dermatitis elicitation thresholds of potent allergens in humans. Food Chem Toxicol 2001;39:1095-108. [PMID: 11527569 DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00059-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
65 |
Smith CK, Cheung C, Elahi EN, Hotchkiss SA. High-performance liquid chromatography method for the quantification of non-radiolabelled cinnamic compounds in analytes derived from human skin absorption and metabolism experiments. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2001;758:249-64. [PMID: 11486835 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00184-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
66 |
VanderEnde DS, Morrow JD. Release of markedly increased quantities of prostaglandin D2 from the skin in vivo in humans after the application of cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:62-7. [PMID: 11423836 DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.113694] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
67 |
Roggeband R, Basketter DA, De Groot AC, Robinson MK, Gerberick GF. Labelling of skin sensitizers: the new European Dangerous Preparations Directive. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:321-4. [PMID: 11380540 DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044006321.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
68 |
Stumpf DK, Ray DT, Schloman WW. Identification of a contact allergen in guayule latex and formulated guayule latex products. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 2001;78:217-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s11746-001-0247-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
69 |
Andersen KE, Johansen JD, Bruze M, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lepoittevin JP, Rastogi S, White I, Menné T. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001;170:166-71. [PMID: 11162781 DOI: 10.1006/taap.2000.9095] [Cited by in Crossref: 87] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
70 |
de Groot AC, White IR. Cosmetics and Skin Care Products. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis 2001. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_32] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
71 |
Menné T, Johansen JD, Frosch P. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Man — Experimental and Quantitative Aspects. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2001. pp. 237-48. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
72 |
Wahlberg JE. Patch Testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J, editors. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2001. pp. 435-68. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_21] [Cited by in Crossref: 77] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
73 |
Smith CK, Moore CA, Elahi EN, Smart AT, Hotchkiss SA. Human skin absorption and metabolism of the contact allergens, cinnamic aldehyde, and cinnamic alcohol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000;168:189-99. [PMID: 11042091 DOI: 10.1006/taap.2000.9025] [Cited by in Crossref: 124] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
74 |
Schürer NY. Bewertung von Duftstoffen in Kosmetika und Topika. Nutzen und Risiko von Kosmetika 2000. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59747-3_18] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
75 |
de Groot AC. Fragrances. In: Kanerva L, Wahlberg JE, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2000. pp. 497-508. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-07677-4_63] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
76 |
de Groot AC. Allergic contact dermatitis: cosmetics. Immunology and Drug Therapy of Allergic Skin Diseases 2000. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8464-8_8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
77 |
Bruze M, Condé-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:241-50. [PMID: 10554056 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06154.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 192] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
78 |
de Groot AC. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to preservatives and fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:224-7. [PMID: 10515107 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06139.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
79 |
Rees TD. Orofacial granulomatosis and related conditions. Periodontol 2000 1999;21:145-57. [PMID: 10551180 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00173.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
80 |
Kimber I, Gerberick GF, Basketter DA. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. Food Chem Toxicol 1999;37:553-60. [PMID: 10456684 DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00048-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 61] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
81 |
Katsarou A, Armenaka M, Kalogeromitros D, Koufou V, Georgala S. Contact reactions to fragrances. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999;82:449-55. [PMID: 10353576 DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62720-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
82 |
Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Frosch P, Dreier B, Lepoittevin JP, White I, Menné T. Deodorants: a clinical provocation study in fragrance-sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:161-5. [PMID: 9817220 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05887.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
83 |
Johansen JD, Bruze M, Andersen KE, Frosch PJ, Dreier B, White IR, Rastogi S, Lepoittevin JP, Menné T. The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:95-6. [PMID: 9746200 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05850.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 87] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
84 |
Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Frosch P, Menné T, Bruze M, Lepoittevin JP, Dreier B, Andersen KE, White IR. Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:29-35. [PMID: 9504243 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05633.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 130] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
85 |
Johansen JD. Quantitative Aspects in Patch Testing and Usage Tests. Fragrances 1998. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-80340-6_13] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
86 |
de Groot AC, Frosch PJ. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:57-86. [PMID: 9062742 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 210] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 215] [Article Influence: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
87 |
Flyvholm MA, Hall BM, Agner T, Tiedemann E, Greenhill P, Vanderveken W, Freeberg FE, Menné T. Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing formaldehyde releaser. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:26-33. [PMID: 9034684 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 72] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
88 |
Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Menné T. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:414-8. [PMID: 8879928 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 70] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
89 |
Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Menné T. Natural ingredients based cosmetics. Content of selected fragrance sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:423-6. [PMID: 8879930 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02246.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 82] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|