BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Shuster S. Patch-Test Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Individuals and Populations: . American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1992;3:74-8. [DOI: 10.1097/01634989-199206000-00006] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Suárez-Pérez JA, Bosch R, González S, González E. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of contact dermatitis: Applications of reflectance confocal microscopy. World J Dermatol 2014; 3(3): 45-49 [DOI: 10.5314/wjd.v3.i3.45] [Cited by in CrossRef: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Dickel H, Altmeyer P, Brasch J. "New" techniques for more sensitive patch testing? J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2011;9:889-96. [PMID: 21535406 DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07671.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Dickel H, Kreft B, Kuss O, Worm M, Soost S, Brasch J, Pfützner W, Grabbe J, Angelova-fischer I, Elsner P, Fluhr J, Altmeyer P, Geier J. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. Contact Dermatitis 2010;62:294-302. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01710.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Astner S, González S, Gonzalez E. Noninvasive evaluation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Dermatitis. 2006;17:182-191. [PMID: 17150167 DOI: 10.2310/6620.2006.05052] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Astner S, Gonzalez E, Cheung A, Rius-Diaz F, González S. Pilot study on the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:986-992. [PMID: 16310059 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.026] [Cited by in Crossref: 67] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73] [Article Influence: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation: Contact Point. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:280-2. [DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00033.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 116] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Schnuch A, Geier J, Brasch J, Uter W. The preservative iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: frequency of allergic reactions and diagnostic considerations: Results from the IVDK *. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:153-6. [DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460305.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Schnuch A. PAFS: population-adjusted frequency of sensitization. (I) Influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:377-82. [PMID: 8879920 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02236.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 55] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Menne T. Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:165-71. [PMID: 8833458 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 90] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Kligman AM. A personal critique of diagnostic patch testing. Clin Dermatol 1996;14:35-40. [PMID: 8901397 DOI: 10.1016/0738-081x(95)00106-p] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]