BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Brasch J, Henseler T, Aberer W, Bäuerle G, Frosch PJ, Fuchs T, Fünfstück V, Kaiser G, Lischka GG, Pilz B. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:584-91. [PMID: 8089284 DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(94)70220-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Riedel F, Aparicio-Soto M, Curato C, Thierse HJ, Siewert K, Luch A. Immunological Mechanisms of Metal Allergies and the Nickel-Specific TCR-pMHC Interface. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:10867. [PMID: 34682608 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010867] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Svedman C, Bruze M. Patch Testing: Technical Details and Interpretation. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_62] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Lanolin. Common Contact Allergens 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119405702.ch35] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Knijp J, Bruynzeel DP, Rustemeyer T. Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101. Contact Dermatitis 2019;80:298-303. [PMID: 30624788 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13210] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Svedman C, Bruze M. Patch Testing: Technical Details and Interpretation. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_62-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Carossino AM, Carulli C, Ciuffi S, Carossino R, Zappoli Thyrion GD, Zonefrati R, Innocenti M, Brandi ML. Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:486. [PMID: 27881114 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1342-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Suárez-Pérez JA, Bosch R, González S, González E. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of contact dermatitis: Applications of reflectance confocal microscopy. World J Dermatol 2014; 3(3): 45-49 [DOI: 10.5314/wjd.v3.i3.45] [Cited by in CrossRef: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Martins LE, Reis VM. Cytokine detection for the diagnosis of chromium allergy. An Bras Dermatol 2013;88:719-25. [PMID: 24173176 DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132164] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Sasseville D. “Doctor, Why Are My Patch Tests Negative?”. Patch Testing Tips 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45395-3_5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Ale IS. The Validity of Patch Testing. Patch Testing Tips 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45395-3_4] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Dickel H, Kuss O, Kamphowe J, Altmeyer P, Höxtermann S. Association of CD69 up-regulation on CD4+ Cla+ T cells versus patch test, strip patch test and clinical history in nickel sensitization. Eur J Med Res 2010;15:303-8. [PMID: 20696642 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-7-303] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Dickel H. Aktuelle Stellung des Abrissepikutantests in der Berufsdermatologie — eine Fallserie. Allergo J 2012;21:348-353. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-012-0352-9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Lindemann M. Determination of nickel and chromium allergy, sensitization, and toxicity by cellular in vitro methods*. Dermatotoxicology 2012. [DOI: 10.3109/9781841848570.042] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Ale IS, Maibach HI. The diagnostic value of patch testing. Dermatotoxicology 2012. [DOI: 10.3109/9781841848570.047] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Jung B, Park W, Kim D, Choi E, Kim Y, Hwang I, Chae Y. Monitoring of Formaldehyde in Cosmetic Products. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Scientists of Korea 2012;38:51-55. [DOI: 10.15230/scsk.2012.38.1.051] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Ruëff F, Przybilla B. Toxische und allergische Kontaktdermatitis. Braun-Falco’s Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24163-5_30] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Beck MH, Wilkinson SM. Contact Dermatitis: Allergic. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology 2010. [DOI: 10.1002/9781444317633.ch26] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Le Coz CJ, Sasseville D. [Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2009;136:610-6. [PMID: 19686897 DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2009.06.006] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Schnuch A, Brasch J, Uter W. Polysensitization and increased susceptibility in contact allergy: a review. Allergy 2008;63:156-67. [PMID: 18186806 DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01590.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 64] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Bartram F, Donate H, E. Müller K, Bückendorf C, Ohnsorge P, Huber W, von Baehr V. Bedeutung von Epikutantest und Lymphozytentransformationstest für die Diagnostik von Typ IV-Sensibilisierungen Stellungnahme des Deutschen Berufsverbandes der Umweltmediziner Significance of the patch test and the lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnostics of type IV sensitization Statement of the German Professional Association for Environmental Medicine. LaboratoriumsMedizin 2006;30:101-106. [DOI: 10.1515/jlm.2006.014] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Przybilla B, Ruëff F. Toxische und allergische Kontaktdermatitis. Dermatologie und Venerologie. [DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26624-0_24] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Schiessl C, Strohal R. Letter to the Editor. Contact Dermatitis 2004;51:45-46. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00392.x] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Rancé F, Giordano-labadie F. Intérêt des tests épicutanés dans la dermatite atopique du nourrisson. Revue Française d'Allergologie et d'Immunologie Clinique 2001;41:373-381. [DOI: 10.1016/s0335-7457(01)00040-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Brasch J, Becker D, Effendy I. Reproduzierbarkeit von Epikutantestungen mit Natriumlauryl-sulfat bei verblindeter klinischer Ablesung — eine DKG-Studie. Dermatologie an der Schwelle zum neuen Jahrtausend 2000. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57191-6_42] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Ruëff F. Epikutantest bei Patienten. Nutzen und Risiko von Kosmetika 2000. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59747-3_8] [Reference Citation Analysis]