BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Al-Amiry B, Pantelakis G, Mahmood S, Kadum B, Brismar TB, Sayed-Noor AS. Does body mass index affect restoration of femoral offset, leg length and cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty? A prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:422. [PMID: 31510993 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2790-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Holliday M, Steward A. Pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification? J Med Radiat Sci 2021;68:228-36. [PMID: 33590673 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.461] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Luger M, Feldler S, Klasan A, Gotterbarm T, Schopper C. The morphology of the proximal femur in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty: No negative effect on offset reconstruction, leg length difference and implant positioning. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:730. [PMID: 34930358 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02876-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Yao M, Wang Y, Wei C, Han Y, Li H. Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Int Med Res 2020;48:300060520925999. [PMID: 32459103 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520925999] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Mavčič B, Antolič V. Cementless femoral stem fixation and leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty in different proximal femoral morphological types. Int Orthop 2021;45:891-6. [PMID: 32572540 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04671-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]