BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Long JT, Eastwood DC, Graf AR, Smith PA, Harris GF. Repeatability and sources of variability in multi-center assessment of segmental foot kinematics in normal adults. Gait & Posture 2010;31:32-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.240] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 van Hoeve S, Poeze M. Multisegment Foot Models and Clinical Application After Foot and Ankle Trauma: A Review. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 2019;58:748-54. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.013] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Deschamps K, Staes F, Bruyninckx H, Busschots E, Jaspers E, Atre A, Desloovere K. Repeatability in the assessment of multi-segment foot kinematics. Gait & Posture 2012;35:255-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.016] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Novak AC, Mayich DJ, Perry SD, Daniels TR, Brodsky JW. Gait Analysis for Foot and Ankle Surgeons— Topical Review, Part 2: Approaches to Multisegment Modeling of the Foot. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35:178-91. [DOI: 10.1177/1071100713511435] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Gojkovic Z, Ivancevic T, Jovanovic B. Biomechanical model of swimming rehabilitation after hip and knee surgery. J Biomech 2019;94:165-9. [PMID: 31427093 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.035] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Leardini A, Caravaggi P, Theologis T, Stebbins J. Multi-segment foot models and their use in clinical populations. Gait & Posture 2019;69:50-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.022] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Roach KE, Foreman KB, MacWilliams BA, Karpos K, Nichols J, Anderson AE. The modified Shriners Hospitals for Children Greenville (mSHCG) multi-segment foot model provides clinically acceptable measurements of ankle and midfoot angles: A dual fluoroscopy study. Gait Posture 2021;85:258-65. [PMID: 33626450 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.004] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Bishop C, Paul G, Thewlis D. The reliability, accuracy and minimal detectable difference of a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot–shoe complex. Gait & Posture 2013;37:552-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.020] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Kent J, Franklyn-miller A. Biomechanical models in the study of lower limb amputee kinematics: a review. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 2011;35:124-39. [DOI: 10.1177/0309364611407677] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Deschamps K, Staes F, Roosen P, Nobels F, Desloovere K, Bruyninckx H, Matricali GA. Body of evidence supporting the clinical use of 3D multisegment foot models: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 2011;33:338-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.018] [Cited by in Crossref: 104] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72] [Article Influence: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Krzak JJ, Corcos DM, Graf A, Smith P, Harris GF. Effect of fine wire electrode insertion on gait patterns in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2013;37:251-7. [PMID: 22939752 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.030] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Leardini A, Stebbins J, Hillstrom H, Caravaggi P, Deschamps K, Arndt A. ISB recommendations for skin-marker-based multi-segment foot kinematics. J Biomech 2021;125:110581. [PMID: 34217032 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110581] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Seo SG, Lee DY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ, Kim J, Lee KM, Chung CY, Choi IH. Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults. J Foot Ankle Res 2014;7:24. [PMID: 24782914 DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-24] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Saraswat P, Macwilliams BA, Davis RB. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: Method repeatability in pediatric feet. Gait & Posture 2012;35:547-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.022] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Sung KH, Chung CY, Lee KM, Kwon KB, Lee JH, Park MS. Discrepancy between true ankle dorsiflexion and gait kinematics and its association with severity of planovalgus foot deformity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020;21:250. [PMID: 32299475 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03285-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Yoo HJ, Park HS, Lee DO, Kim SH, Park GY, Cho TJ, Lee DY. Comparison of the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five different multi-segment foot models. J Foot Ankle Res 2022;15:1. [PMID: 34991669 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-021-00508-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Mayich DJ, Novak A, Vena D, Daniels TR, Brodsky JW. Gait Analysis in Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery—Topical Review, Part 1: Principles and Uses of Gait Analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35:80-90. [DOI: 10.1177/1071100713508394] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Van den Herrewegen I, Cuppens K, Broeckx M, Barisch-fritz B, Vander Sloten J, Leardini A, Peeraer L. Dynamic 3D scanning as a markerless method to calculate multi-segment foot kinematics during stance phase: Methodology and first application. Journal of Biomechanics 2014;47:2531-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Oriwol D, Milani TL, Maiwald C. Methodological issues associated with the mean value of repeated laboratory running measurements. Footwear Science 2012;4:183-90. [DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2012.676676] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Bishop C, Paul G, Thewlis D. Recommendations for the reporting of foot and ankle models. Journal of Biomechanics 2012;45:2185-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.019] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Raffalt PC, Nielsen LR, Madsen S, Munk Højberg L, Pingel J, Nielsen JB, Wienecke J, Alkjær T. Day-to-day reliability of gait characteristics in rats. J Biomech 2018;72:247-51. [PMID: 29530501 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.035] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Saraswat P, Macwilliams BA, Davis RB, D’astous JL. Kinematics and kinetics of normal and planovalgus feet during walking. Gait & Posture 2014;39:339-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 56] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Lee DY, Seo SG, Kim EJ, Kim SJ, Lee KM, Choi IH. Inter-segmental motions of the foot in healthy adults: Gender difference. J Orthop Sci 2016;21:804-9. [PMID: 27727048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]