Transpapillary preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) only for the future remnant liver (FRL) in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) can be performed minimally invasively, with the expectation of swelling of the FRL. However, verification of the appropriate transpapillary unilateral PBD method for FRL is limited as the cases of liver resection are insufficient.

A total of 63 patients with resectable HCCA were evaluated. Of note, 12 unilateral across-the-papilla plastic stent (PS) placement cases (PS group), 14 unilateral intraductal PS (IS) placement cases (IS group), and 11 unilateral endoscopic nasobiliary drainage cases (ENBD group) met the inclusion criteria. Each group was compared in terms of the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival (OS), and surgical outcomes.

No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics between the groups. Hospital stay for the endoscopic procedure was significantly longer in the ENBD group (50 days [IQR, 33-163]) than in the PS group (14 days [IQR, 2-36]; P <.01) or IS group (21 days [IQR, 6-118]; P <.01). There were no significant differences in the RBO, TRBO, OS, surgical time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, or postsurgical adverse events (AEs) between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, there were no significantly related factors for RBO, TRBO, OS, and postsurgical AEs.

The PS, IS, and ENBD groups showed similar clinical outcomes in liver resection cases for HCCA, excluding the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure. Considering the hospital stay duration, unilateral PS and IS placement can be considered acceptable for transpapillary PBD.

Recent years have witnessed significant advances in the imaging, molecular profiling, and systemic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Despite this progress, the early detection, precise classification, and effective management of CCA remain challenging. Owing to recent developments and the significant differences in CCA subtypes, EASL commissioned a panel of experts to draft evidence-based recommendations on the management of extrahepatic CCA, comprising distal and perihilar CCA. Particular attention is given to the need for accurate classification systems, the integration of emerging molecular insights, and practical strategies for diagnosis and treatment that reflect real-world clinical scenarios.

Stenting malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is challenging due to its complex structure, and it is less effective than blockages in the distal bile duct area. Plastic stents (PSs) and metal stents (MSs) are commonly used for stenting MHBO. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PSs and MSs in MHBO patients.

We conducted a search of medical databases up to March 2024. Using a fixed-effect model, we analyzed the risk ratios (RRs) of the outcomes between the PS and MS groups. We calculated the RR for clinical and technical success, reinterventions, and adverse events, as well as the hazard ratio (HR) for survival and stent patency.

This analysis includes five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 322 patients (156 in the PS group and 166 in the MS group). Significant differences (P < .05) in favor of the MS group were found in the reinterventions (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.07-3.04), and stent patency (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.90). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the PS and MS groups regarding technical success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.09), clinical success (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.07), overall survival (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47-1.05), stent migration (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.08-6.02), stent occlusion (RR1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.81), and adverse events (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53-1.20).

Both PS and MS are effective for managing MHBO, while MS offers greater efficacy in increased stent patency and lower reintervention rates. Key message What is already known on this topic Metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) are used for palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). MSs significantly reduced the need for reinterventions compared to PSs in patients with MHBO. What this study adds There were no significant differences between MSs and PSs in terms of technical success, clinical success, overall survival, stent migration, stent occlusion, or adverse events. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The study's findings may prompt researchers to design more targeted studies to further investigate these specific outcomes in MHBO patients. The results encourage endoscopists to consider patient-specific factors, such as life expectancy and preference for minimizing recurrent procedures, when choosing between MSs and PSs for MHBO.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is an aggressive biliary malignancy originating from the epithelial cells of the bile duct, typically located in the extrahepatic biliary tree, proximal to the cystic duct. PHCC often presents with a rapid onset of jaundice. While radical surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, only a minority of patients are eligible due to early metastasis and challenges associated with preoperative evaluations. Comprehensive treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, are crucial for managing PHCC. However, in advanced stages, complications such as cholestatic liver injury, malnutrition, and biliary infections pose significant obstacles to these treatments. Therefore, biliary drainage (BD) is essential in the management of PHCC. In addition to external drainage methods like percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD), particularly endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), offer an effective option for internal drainage, which is more physiologically compatible and better tolerated. Furthermore, the integration of various endoscopic techniques has expanded the management of PHCC beyond mere drainage. Techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) based methods present new therapeutic avenues, albeit with variable results. This review aims to summarize current advancements and ongoing debates in the field of endoscopic treatment for unresectable PHCC.

Although various self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) have been introduced, the optimal SEMS for MHBO has not yet been established.

This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of the transpapillary placement of an uncovered laser-cut SEMS with an ultra-thin delivery sheath (YABUSAME) for MHBO.

This multicenter, prospective study was conducted in 11 hospitals for 10 months (from March 2022 to December 2022). The primary outcome was the stent patency rate at 6 months. Key secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, clinical success rate, time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.

Of 45 enrolled patients, 43 patients underwent biliary drainage, including 42 patients who underwent YABUSAME placement; 66.7% of patients received chemotherapy, and 60% had previously undergone biliary drainage. Drainage methods were partial stent-in-stent, side-by-side, and unilateral in 65.1%, 7.0%, and 27.9% of patients, respectively. Technical and clinical success rates were 93.2% (41/45) and 79.1% (34/45), respectively. The incidence rate of early postprocedural adverse events was 2.2%. The stent patency rate at 6 months was 55.3%. The median time to RBO was 231 days. The median OS was 125 days.

This study showed that the primary outcome, the 6-month stent patency rate, exceeded the expected rate of 55%, which indicates the efficacy of YABUSAME placement for MHBO.

The goal of this study was to compare the advantages of long slim metal stents (LSMSs) versus conventional metal stents in bilateral endoscopic side-by-side (SBS) deployment for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO).

A total of 140 consecutive patients with MHBO treated by endoscopic bilateral SBS deployment at a high-volume tertiary referral center were analyzed retrospectively; this included 50 patients in the LSMS group and the other 90 patients in the conventional SBS group as control. Propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio was used to reduce selection bias. The primary outcome was stent patency.

After propensity score matching, no significant difference was observed in stent patency (267 vs 268 days; P = .923) or overall survival (225 vs 211 days; P = .883) between the 2 groups. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups, and the clinical success rate was 91.1% in the LSMS group and 92.9% in the control group (P = .735). Early and late adverse events were similar (24.4% vs 34.3%, P = .423; 42.2% vs 38.6%, P = .697); the procedure time and bilateral metal stenting time in the LSMS group were significantly shorter (41.0 minutes vs 57.5 minutes, P = .000; 19.0 minutes vs 28.5 minutes, P = .000). The success rate of endoscopic bilateral revisionary stent insertion in the LSMS group was also higher (100% vs 33.3%; P = .000).

Bilateral LSMS placement is a viable option for patients with MHBO. It includes advantages of less operative difficulty and easier future re-intervention over conventional SBS stenting.

The role of endo-biliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) in treating malignant biliary strictures remains a subject of controversy. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA in conjunction with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to SEMS alone.

This single-center prospective pragmatic comparative study, conducted between June 2021 and November 2022, involved 23 patients undergoing EB-RFA plus SEMS and 48 patients undergoing SEMS for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. The study evaluated overall survival, stent patency and adverse events.

Seventy-one patients (mean age [SD], 57.8 [11.2] years; 73.2% men) were enrolled. The clinical success rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (78.3% in EB-RFA and 66.6% in SEMS; p 0.316). The median (95% CI) overall survival was 155 (79.87-230.13) days in the EB-RFA group, contrasting with 86.0 (78.06-123.94) days in the SEMS group (p 0.020). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.035; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96) and EB-RFA (p 0.047; HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.01-3.49) independently predicted overall survival. Median (95% CI) stent patency was 143.0 (95% CI, 61.61-224.39) days in the EB-RFA group compared to 78.0 (95% CI, 32.74-123.26) days in the SEMS group (p 0.019). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.046, HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), EB-RFA (p 0.023; HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) and chemotherapy (p 0.017, HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26) independently predicted longer stent patency. There was no difference in procedure-related adverse events in both groups.

EB-RFA with SEMS placement proves to be a safe and effective technique for palliative biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures, demonstrating superior overall survival and stent patency compared to SEMS alone. Further confirmation through multi-center trials is warranted.

ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05320328).

Covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) are used for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) management. Despite increasing evidence, a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of CSEMSs in MHBO management is lacking.

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened up to March 31, 2024, for studies including MHBO treated by a CSEMS. Studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria, including adult MHBO patients treated with CSEMS placement, reporting technical success, clinical success, and adverse event rates were selected. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using the random-effects model, with heterogeneity and publication bias assessment.

From 401 articles, 7 studies were included. Pooled technical and clinical success rates of CSEMSs were 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.6-98.6; I2 = 0%) and 91.6% (95% CI, 86.1-95.0; I2 = 0%). Overall adverse events were reported in 16.6% of cases (95% CI, 11.2-23.9; I2 = 24%), which included cholangitis (7.4%), pancreatitis (5.9%), liver abscess (5.9%), and cholecystitis (2.8%). Stent migration and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) were observed in 8.9% and 49.6% of cases, respectively, with a median time to RBO of 142 days. Reintervention was successful in 92.5% of cases (95% CI, 83.1-96.9; I2 = 0%).

Our meta-analysis revealed high technical and clinical success rates of CSEMS placement in MHBO. Adverse events, notably cholangitis, cholecystitis, and pancreatitis, were <10%. RBO and stent migration were mitigated by CSEMS removal and successful reintervention. Our findings highlight the efficacy and safety of CSEMSs in managing MHBO, warranting further research to optimize treatment strategies.

Relief of cholestasis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma is commonly undertaken in both curative and palliative treatment plans. There are numerous open questions with regard to the ideal biliary drainage strategy - including what constitutes clinical success (CS). In the existing data, curative patients and patients from the Western world are underrepresented.

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with complex malignant hilar obstruction (Bismuth-Corlette II and higher) due to cholangiocarcinoma who underwent biliary drainage at a German referral center between 2010 and 2020. We aimed to define CS and complication rates and directly compare outcomes in curative and palliative patients.

56 curative and 72 palliative patients underwent biliary drainage. In patients with curative intent, CS was achieved significantly more often regardless of what definition of CS was applied (e.g., total serum bilirubin (TSB) < 2 mg/dl: 66.1% vs. 27.8%, p = < 0.001, > 75% reduction of TSB: 57.1% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.003). This observation held true only when subgroups with the same Bismuth-Corlette stage were compared. Moreover, palliative patients experienced a significantly greater percentage of adverse events (33.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.01). Curative intent treatment and TSB at presentation were predictive factors of CS regardless of what definition of CS was applied. The observed CS rates are comparable to published studies involving curative patients, but inferior to reported CS rates in palliative series mostly from Asia.

Biliary drainage in complex malignant hilar obstruction due to cholangiocarcinoma is more likely to be successful and less likely to cause adverse events in curative patients compared to palliative patients.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.

The placement of plastic stents (PS), including intraductal PS (IS), is useful in patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) because of patency and ease of endoscopic reintervention (ERI). However, the optimal stent replacement method for PS remains unclear.

This retrospective study included 322 patients with UMHBO. Among them, 146 received PS placement as initial drainage (across-the-papilla PS [aPS], 54; IS, 92), whereas 75 required ERI. Eight bilateral aPS, 21 bilateral IS, and 17 bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placements met the inclusion criteria. Rates of technical and clinical success, adverse events, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival, and secondary ERI were compared.

There were no significant intergroup differences in rates of technical or clinical success, adverse events, RBO occurrence, or overall survival. The median TRBO was significantly shorter in the aPS group (47 days) than IS (91 days; P = 0.0196) and SEMS (143 days; P < 0.01) groups. Median TRBO did not differ significantly between the IS and SEMS groups (P = 0.44). On Cox multivariate analysis, the aPS group had the shortest stent patency (hazard ratio 2.67 [95% confidence interval 1.05-6.76], P = 0.038). For secondary ERI, the median endoscopic procedure time was significantly shorter in the IS (22 min) vs. SEMS (40 min) group (P = 0.034).

Bilateral IS and SEMS placement featured prolonged patency after first ERI. Because bilateral IS placement is faster than SEMS placement and IS can be removed during secondary ERI, it may be a good option for first ERI.

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) can cause obstructive jaundice and/or cholangitis necessitating appropriate biliary drainage. Endoscopic biliary stenting is the first-choice treatment, especially in unresectable cases, owing to its minimally invasive nature and utility. However, the hilar region is complex because of the branching and curving of bile ducts, making strictures in this area more complicated. Therefore, MHBO stenting is challenging, and treatment strategies have yet to be established. Furthermore, recent advances in antitumor therapies have altered the background surrounding the development of stenting strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and grasp the current evidence well and to accumulate additional evidence reflecting the current situation. This study reviews the current status, issues, and prospects of endoscopic stenting for MHBO, especially in unresectable cases.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Although intraductal plastic stent (IS) placement is an effective treatment for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO), the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral IS drainage remains controversial. This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness of bilateral IS placement for UMHBO using the propensity score matching method.

Patients who underwent transpapillary endoscopic stenting for UMHBO were analyzed for technical and clinical success, adverse events, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO).

A total of 321 patients were enrolled in the study with 27 patients in each unilateral and bilateral IS group in the propensity score-based cohort. Technical success was 100%, while clinical success was 93% and 96% in the unilateral and bilateral IS groups, respectively (p = 1.0). Cholecystitis occurred in 4% and 7%, respectively (p = 1.0). The median TRBO was shorter in the unilateral group (129 [5-383] days) than that in the bilateral group (226 [16-563] days) (p = .0281). Bilateral IS placement was an independent long TRBO factor (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.97; p = .041).

Unilateral and bilateral IS placement had high technical and clinical success rates in primary stent placement. However, bilateral IS placement showed a longer TRBO. Bilateral IS placement may be a good option for initial UMHBO drainage.

Primary biliary tract tumors are malignancies that originate in the liver, bile ducts, or gallbladder. These tumors often present with jaundice of unknown etiology, leading to delayed diagnosis and advanced disease. Currently, several palliative treatment options are available for primary biliary tract tumors. They include percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), biliary stenting, and surgical interventions such as biliary diversion. Systemic therapy is also commonly used for the palliative treatment of primary biliary tract tumors. It involves the administration of chemotherapy drugs, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, which have shown promising results in improving overall survival in patients with advanced biliary tract tumors. PTBD is another palliative treatment option for patients with unresectable or inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. Biliary stenting can also be used as a palliative treatment option to alleviate symptoms in patients with unresectable or inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. Surgical interventions, such as biliary diversion, have traditionally been used as palliative options for primary biliary tract tumors. However, biliary diversion only provides temporary relief and does not remove the tumor. Primary biliary tract tumors often present in advanced stages, making palliative treatment the primary option for improving the quality of life of patients.

Endoscopic management of unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (HMBO) is technically challenging, and effectiveness of stent-in-stent using large-cell, metal stents was reported. A new, large-cell stent with a 6F tapered delivery system was recently developed. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of slim-delivery and conventional large-cell stents.

This was a multicenter retrospective comparative study of stent-in-stent methods using slim-delivery stents (Niti-S Large Cell SR Slim Delivery [LC slim-delivery]) and conventional stents (Niti-S large-cell D-type; LCD) for unresectable HMBO.

Eighty-three patients with HMBO were included; 31 LC slim-delivery and 52 LCD. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 90% in LC slim-delivery group and 98% and 88% in LCD group. Use of the LC slim-delivery was associated with shorter stent placement time in the multiple regression analysis, with a stent placement time of 18 and 23 min in LC slim-delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The early adverse event (AE) rate of LC slim-delivery was 10%, with no cholangitis or cholecystitis as compared to 23% in the LCD group. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates and time to RBO were comparable between the two groups: 35% and 44%, and 8.5 and 8.0 months in LC slim-delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The major cause of RBO was tumor ingrowth (82%) in the LC slim-delivery group and sludge (43%) and ingrowth (48%) in LCD group.

Stent-in-stent methods using LC slim-delivery shortened stent placement time with low early AE rates and comparable time to RBO in patients with HMBO.

Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) emergencies in patients with cancer encompass an extensive array of various conditions, including primary malignancies that require prompt treatment, associated severe complications, and life-threatening consequences arising from treatment. In patients with cancer, the liver can be affected by chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity, veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome, liver hemorrhage, and other complications arising from cancer therapy with all these complications requiring timely diagnosis and prompt treament. Cholecystitis induced by systemic anticancer therapies can result in severe conquences if not promptly identified and treated. The application of immunotherapy in cancer therapy is associated with cholangitis. Hemobilia, often caused by medical interventions, may require arterial embolization in patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability. Malignant biliary obstruction in patients with biliary cancers may necessitate palliative strategies such as biliary stenting. In pancreatic cancer, patients often miss surgical treatment due to advanced disease stages or distant metastases, leading to potential emergencies at different treatment phases. This comprehensive review underscores the complexities of diagnostic and treatment roles of medical imaging in managing HPB emergencies in patients with cancer. It illustrates the crucial role of imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound, in diagnosing and managing these conditions for timely intervention. It provides essential insights into the critical nature of early diagnosis and intervention in cancer-related HPB emergencies, ultimately impacting patient outcomes and survival rates.