BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Nael K, Fenchel M, Krishnam M, Finn JP, Laub G, Ruehm SG. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:392-398. [PMID: 17507810 DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000261937.77365.6a] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Hecht EM, Rosenkrantz A. Pulmonary MR angiography techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009;17:101-31. [PMID: 19364603 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2009.01.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Yrjänä SK, Vaara T, Karttunen A, Koivukangas J. Pulse Repetition Time and Contrast Enhancement: Simulation Study of Gd-BOPTA and Conventional Contrast Agent at Different Field Strengths. Investigative Radiology 2008;43:267-75. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181636eb8] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Tomasian A, Salamon N, Krishnam MS, Finn JP, Villablanca JP. 3D high-spatial-resolution cerebral MR venography at 3T: a contrast-dose-reduction study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:349-55. [PMID: 18945800 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Stinson EG, Borisch EA, Johnson CP, Trzasko JD, Young PM, Riederer SJ. Vascular masking for improved unfolding in 2D SENSE-accelerated 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1161-70. [PMID: 23897776 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24266] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Mayerhoefer ME, Szomolanyi P, Jirak D, Berg A, Materka A, Dirisamer A, Trattnig S. Effects of Magnetic Resonance Image Interpolation on the Results of Texture-Based Pattern Classification: A Phantom Study. Investigative Radiology 2009;44:405-11. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181a50a66] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Hansmann J, Apfaltrer P, Zoellner FG, Henzler T, Meyer M, Weisser G, Schoenberg SO, Attenberger UI. Correlation analysis of dual-energy CT iodine maps with quantitative pulmonary perfusion MRI. World J Radiol 2013;5:202-7. [PMID: 23805370 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i5.202] [Cited by in CrossRef: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Kramer H, Runge VM, Morelli JN, Williams KD, Naul LG, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Wintersperger BJ. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1667-76. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2110-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Kinner S, Maderwald S, Parohl N, Albert J, Corot C, Robert P, Barkhausen J, Vogt FM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in rabbits: evaluation of the gadolinium-based agent p846 and the iron-based blood pool agent p904 in comparison with gadoterate meglumine. Invest Radiol 2011;46:524-9. [PMID: 21577130 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821ae21f] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Riederer SJ, Haider CR, Borisch EA, Weavers PT, Young PM. Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:3-22. [PMID: 26032598 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24880] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Bueltmann E, Erb G, Kirchin MA, Klose U, Naegele T. Intra-individual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Supraaortic Vessels at 3 Tesla: . Investigative Radiology 2008;43:695-702. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e31817d1505] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Kramer H, Zenge M, Schmitt P, Glaser C, Reiser MF, Herrmann KA. Peripheral Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) With Continuous Table Movement at 3.0 T: Initial Experience Compared With Step-by-Step MRA. Investigative Radiology 2008;43:627-34. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e31817e90e9] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Tomasian A, Lohan DG, Laub G, Singhal A, Finn JP, Krishnam MS. Noncontrast 3D steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic central veins using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: initial experience. Invest Radiol 2008;43:306-13. [PMID: 18424951 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31816be927] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Peldschus K, Hamdorf M, Robert P, Port M, Graessner J, Adam G, Herborn CU. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Evaluation of the High Relaxivity Low Diffusible Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent P846 in Comparison With Gadoterate Meglumine in Rabbits at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla. Investigative Radiology 2008;43:837-42. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181852158] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Deshpande V, Tran L, Laub G, Finn JP, Ruehm SG. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2008;43:411-20. [PMID: 18496046 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181690179] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Tomasian A, Salamon N, Lohan DG, Jalili M, Villablanca JP, Finn JP. Supraaortic arteries: contrast material dose reduction at 3.0-T high-spatial-resolution MR angiography--feasibility study. Radiology 2008;249:980-90. [PMID: 19011192 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080209] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Ley S, Unterhinninghofen R, Ley-zaporozhan J, Schenk J, Kauczor H, Szabo G. Validation of Magnetic Resonance Phase-Contrast Flow Measurements in the Main Pulmonary Artery and Aorta Using Perivascular Ultrasound in a Large Animal Model: . Investigative Radiology 2008;43:421-6. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e318169015d] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Henzler T, Dietrich O, Krissak R, Wichmann T, Lanz T, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRI of the lung at 3 Tesla using parallel imaging with 32-receiver channel technology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:541-6. [PMID: 19711408 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21882] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Attenberger UI, Ingrisch M, Dietrich O, Herrmann K, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Schönberg SO, Fink C. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T. Invest Radiol 2009;44:525-31. [PMID: 19652608 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c252] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Griffin M, Grist TM, François CJ. Dynamic Four-Dimensional MR Angiography of the Chest and Abdomen. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 2009;17:77-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2008.12.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Ley S. Imaging pulmonary arterial thromboembolism: challenges and opportunities. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015;23:261-71. [PMID: 25952519 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2015.01.013] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Londy FJ, Lowe S, Stein PD, Weg JG, Eisner RL, Leeper KV, Woodard PK, Sostman HD, Jablonski KA, Fowler SE, Hales CA, Hull RD, Gottschalk A, Naidich DP, Chenevert TL. Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T for contrast-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2012;18:134-9. [PMID: 21993980 DOI: 10.1177/1076029611419840] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Cai N, Xie W, Su Z, Wang S, Liang D. Sparse Parallel MRI Based on Accelerated Operator Splitting Schemes. Comput Math Methods Med 2016;2016:1724630. [PMID: 27746824 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1724630] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Ley S, Kauczor H. MR Imaging/Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries and Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 2008;16:263-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2008.02.012] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Kramer JH, Arnoldi E, François CJ, Wentland AL, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Grist TM. Dynamic and static magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic vessels at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadoterate meglumine at equimolar dose. Invest Radiol 2013;48:121-8. [PMID: 23211552 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827752b4] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Peldschus K, Hamdorf M, Robert P, Port M, Adam G, Herborn CU. Comparison of the high relaxivity Gd chelates P1152 and Gd-BOPTA for contrast-enhanced MR angiography in rabbits at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:459-65. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22261] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]