BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S, Plathow C, Bock M, Zuna I, Kauczor HU. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M Gd-DTPA at three dose levels. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:143-148. [PMID: 15076006 DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000101482.79137.f4] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Plathow C, Schoebinger M, Fink C, Ley S, Puderbach M, Eichinger M, Bock M, Meinzer HP, Kauczor HU. Evaluation of lung volumetry using dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:173-9. [PMID: 15714092 DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200503000-00007] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Swift AJ, Wild JM, Nagle SK, Roldán-Alzate A, François CJ, Fain S, Johnson K, Capener D, van Beek EJ, Kiely DG, Wang K, Schiebler ML. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary hypertension: a practical approach to the current state of the art. J Thorac Imaging 2014;29:68-79. [PMID: 24552882 DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000079] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Hadizadeh DR, Von Falkenhausen M, Kukuk GM, Schöneseiffen K, Gieseke J, Schild HH, Willinek WA. Contrast Material for Abdominal Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography With Parallel Imaging: Intraindividual Equimolar Comparison of a Macrocyclic 1.0 M Gadolinium Chelate and a Linear Ionic 0.5 M Gadolinium Chelate. American Journal of Roentgenology 2010;194:821-9. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.09.3306] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Heiland S, Erb G, Ziegler S, Krix M. Where Contrast Agent Concentration Really Matters – A Comparison of CT and MRI: . Investigative Radiology 2010;45:529-37. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181ea703d] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Tomasian A, Salamon N, Krishnam MS, Finn JP, Villablanca JP. 3D high-spatial-resolution cerebral MR venography at 3T: a contrast-dose-reduction study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:349-55. [PMID: 18945800 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Tomasian A, Salamon N, Lohan DG, Jalili M, Villablanca JP, Finn JP. Supraaortic arteries: contrast material dose reduction at 3.0-T high-spatial-resolution MR angiography--feasibility study. Radiology 2008;249:980-90. [PMID: 19011192 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080209] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Stalder AF, Elverfeldt DV, Paul D, Hennig J, Markl M. Variable echo time imaging: signal characteristics of 1-M gadobutrol contrast agent at 1.5 and 3T. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:113-23. [PMID: 18058940 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21345] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:715-724. [PMID: 16230904 DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3] [Cited by in Crossref: 1129] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 816] [Article Influence: 75.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Nijenhuis RJ, Gerretsen S, Leiner T, Jacobs MJ, van Engelshoven JM, Backes WH. Comparison of 0.5-M Gd-DTPA with 1.0-M gadobutrol for magnetic resonance angiography of the supplying arteries of the spinal cord in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:136-44. [PMID: 15971172 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20340] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Nissen JC, Attenberger UI, Fink C, Dietrich O, Rohrer M, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ. Thoracic and abdominal MRA with gadofosveset: influence of injection rate on vessel signal and image quality. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1932-1938. [PMID: 19283385 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1381-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 van der Molen AJ, Bellin MF. Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: differences in diagnostic efficacy. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:168-74. [PMID: 18372137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Villablanca JP, Nael K, Habibi R, Nael A, Laub G, Finn JP. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2006;41:799-805. [PMID: 17035870 DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000242835.00032.f5] [Cited by in Crossref: 49] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Hansmann J, Apfaltrer P, Zoellner FG, Henzler T, Meyer M, Weisser G, Schoenberg SO, Attenberger UI. Correlation analysis of dual-energy CT iodine maps with quantitative pulmonary perfusion MRI. World J Radiol 2013;5:202-7. [PMID: 23805370 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i5.202] [Cited by in CrossRef: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S, Zaporozhan J, Plathow C, Kauczor HU. Time-resolved echo-shared parallel MRA of the lung: observer preference study of image quality in comparison with non-echo-shared sequences. Eur Radiol 2005;15:2070-4. [PMID: 15988585 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2831-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Nael K, Michaely HJ, Lee M, Goldin J, Laub G, Finn JP. Dynamic pulmonary perfusion and flow quantification with MR imaging, 3.0T vs. 1.5T: Initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:333-9. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20645] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Nikolaou K, Schoenberg SO, Brix G, Goldman JP, Attenberger U, Kuehn B, Dietrich O, Reiser MF. Quantification of Pulmonary Blood Flow and Volume in Healthy Volunteers by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Parallel Imaging Technique. Investigative Radiology 2004;39:537-45. [DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000133813.22873.47] [Cited by in Crossref: 95] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Attenberger UI, Ingrisch M, Büsing K, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. [Magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary perfusion. Technical requirements and diagnostic impact]. Radiologe 2009;49:739-47. [PMID: 19626308 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-009-1880-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Pedersen MR, Fisher MT, van Beek EJR. MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature—an update. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1374-86. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0109-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Seeger A, Kramer U, Fenchel M, Grimm F, Bretschneider C, Döring J, Klumpp B, Tepe G, Rittig K, Seidensticker PR, Claussen CD, Miller S. Comparison between a linear versus a macrocyclic contrast agent for whole body MR angiography in a clinical routine setting. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:63. [PMID: 19116027 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-63] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Attenberger UI, Ingrisch M, Dietrich O, Herrmann K, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Schönberg SO, Fink C. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T. Invest Radiol 2009;44:525-31. [PMID: 19652608 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c252] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Thieme SF, Johnson TR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K. Dual-Energy Lung Perfusion Computed Tomography: A Novel Pulmonary Functional Imaging Method. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2010;31:301-8. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.05.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Giesel FL, Mehndiratta A, Essig M. High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2461-74. [PMID: 20567832 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1805-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Schaefer FK, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, Bourne M, Decobelli F, Goyen M, Griffiths PD, Kopka L, Kreitner KF, Link J, Oberholzer K, Pering C, Poeckler-schoeninger C, Ruehm SG, Sachoran MR, Schulte-altedorneburg G, Springer OS, Steiner P, Wall A, Winterer J, Tombach B. A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0M gadobutrol (Gadovist™) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. European Journal of Radiology 2007;61:315-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.09.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Matsumoto S, Onishi Y, Matsumoto K, Murase K, Sugimura K. Dynamic perfusion MRI: Capability for evaluation of disease severity and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with connective tissue disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:887-99. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21550] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Gaass T, Dinkel J, Bauman G, Zaiss M, Hintze C, Haase A, Laun F. Non-contrast-enhanced MRI of the pulmonary blood volume using two-compartment-modeled T1-relaxation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:397-404. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23674] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 van der Molen AJ. Diagnostic Efficacy of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media. In: Thomsen HS, Webb JAW, editors. Contrast Media. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. pp. 181-91. [DOI: 10.1007/174_2013_896] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Seng K, Maderwald S, de Greiff A, Quick HH, Laub G, Schmitt P, Barkhausen J, Vogt FM. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vessels: an intraindividual comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies. Invest Radiol 2010;45:708-14. [PMID: 20548241 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e5bbb0] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 François CJ, Schiebler ML. Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2016;54:1133-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.05.011] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Plathow C, Klopp M, Schoebinger M, Thieke C, Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S, Weber M, Sandner A, Claussen CD, Herth F, Tuengerthal S, Meinzer H, Kauczor H. Monitoring of Lung Motion in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison With Spirometry. Investigative Radiology 2006;41:443-8. [DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000208222.03256.ba] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Szucs-farkas Z, Froehlich JM, Ulrich M, Wuersten H, Guignard D, Wyss S, Braunschweig M. 1.0-M gadobutrol versus 0.5-M gadoterate for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1399-405. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21351] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Thieme SF, Johnson TR, Lee C, McWilliams J, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:144-149. [PMID: 19542406 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.1653] [Cited by in Crossref: 150] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Zöllner FG, Zahn K, Schaible T, Schoenberg SO, Schad LR, Neff KW. Quantitative pulmonary perfusion imaging at 3.0 T of 2-year-old children after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: initial results. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2743-9. [PMID: 22692394 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2528-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Fenchel M, Franow A, Martirosian P, Engels M, Kramer U, Stauder NI, Helber U, Vogler H, Claussen CD, Miller S. 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for multislice first-pass magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging. BJR 2007;80:884-92. [DOI: 10.1259/bjr/34610669] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Fink C, Risse F, Semmler W, Schoenberg SO, Kauczor HU, Reiser MF. [MRI of pulmonary perfusion]. Radiologe 2006;46:290, 292-6, 298-9. [PMID: 16437237 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1325-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S, Risse F, Kuder TA, Bock M, Thaler J, Plathow C, Kauczor HU. Intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine for time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the upper torso. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:286-90. [PMID: 16028246 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20381] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]