1
|
Choi SS, Jung J, Kim K, Her SH, Lee K, Jeon DS, Hwang BH, Park CS, Lim S, Seo SM, Mok J, Han SH, Kwon SU, Hahn JY, Lee SW, Choi WG. Comparison of Provisional 1-Stent Strategy With Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Planned 2-Stent Strategy in Patients With Non-LM Coronary True-Bifurcation Lesions (PROVISION-DEB). Am J Cardiol 2025; 242:18-23. [PMID: 39889840 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2024] [Revised: 12/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2025] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions presents several difficulties and often results in suboptimal procedural, postprocedural clinical outcomes. While the provisional 1-stent strategy is generally favored for its simplicity and favorable outcomes, a few studies suggest no significant difference between 1-stent and 2-stent techniques for true bifurcation lesions. Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have demonstrated potential in small vessel disease, including bifurcation side branches. However, no studies have compared the 2-stent strategy with the provisional 1-stent plus DEB strategy in non-LM true bifurcation lesions. Our study aims to address this gap by comparing these strategies, with a focus on real-world practice and detailed endpoint analysis. The PROVISION-DEB study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial designed to investigate noninferiority and compare a 1-stent strategy with a drug-eluting balloon and a planned 2-stent strategy at non-LM coronary true-bifurcation lesions. A total of 750 patients with de novo non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing coronary interventions will be randomized 1:1 to either a provisional 1-stent plus DEB strategy or a 2-stent strategy with stratified Diabetes. The primary endpoint is a target lesion failure, composite outcome of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at the anticipated 3 years follow-up (6, 12, and 36 months). In conclusion, PROVISION-DEB study is a randomized, multicenter, noninferior clinical trial and will compare a 1-setnt strategy with a drug-eluting balloon and a planned 2-stent strategy at non-LM coronary true-bifurcation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Suk Choi
- Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Jung
- Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyunyeon Kim
- Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Ho Her
- Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyusup Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Doo-Soo Jeon
- Department of Cardiology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Hee Hwang
- Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul Soo Park
- Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungmin Lim
- Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Min Seo
- Department of Cardiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Jisu Mok
- Department of Cardiology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Han
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Uk Kwon
- Department of Cardiology, Ilsan-Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Whan Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woong Gil Choi
- Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Filippo O, Kang J, Bruno F, Song YB, Campagnuolo S, Choi KH, Pinxterhuis TH, Kim HK, Mattesini A, Cho YK, Piccolo R, Lee HJ, Wańha W, Cortese B, Han SH, Perl L, Hur SH, Tuttolomondo D, Iannaccone M, Chun WJ, Greco A, Leone A, Giachet AT, Gwon HC, Stefanini G, Kim HS, Escaned J, Carmeci A, Campo G, Patti G, Capodanno D, von Birgelen C, Koo BK, de Ferrari GM, Nam CW, D'Ascenzo F. Final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with an upfront provisional stenting strategy. EUROINTERVENTION 2025; 21:e318-e328. [PMID: 40091870 PMCID: PMC11895841 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-24-00471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of final kissing balloon inflation (FKB) in patients treated with an upfront provisional strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions is controversial. AIMS We aimed to assess the impact of FKB on patient- and lesion-oriented outcomes in a large real-world cohort. METHODS The ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry was obtained by patient-level merging the BIFURCAT and ULTRA registries. Pairs of patients were generated with propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) - a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR) or stent thrombosis. A lesion-oriented composite outcome (LOCO) - a composite of target vessel MI (TVMI) or TLR - along with each single component of MACE represented the secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses included the site of bifurcation (unprotected left main [ULM] vs non-ULM), side branch involvement (true bifurcation vs non-true bifurcation), side branch diameter and lesion length. Follow-up was censored at 800 days. RESULTS A total of 5,607 patients undergoing a provisional stenting technique were selected for the present analysis. PSM generated 1,784 pairs. Between the matched patients with FKB versus no FKB, no significant difference in MACE was observed (9.0% vs 8.6%; p=0.68). FKB was associated with a lower rate of the LOCO (1.9% vs 2.9%; p=0.04) compared to the no FKB group, driven by lower rates of TVMI (0.2% vs 0.5%; p=0.03) and TLR (1.8% vs 2.6%; p=0.14). These results were confirmed in the subgroups of patients treated for bifurcations with side branches with a diameter >2.5 mm and for true coronary bifurcation lesions. CONCLUSIONS Among patients treated for coronary bifurcation lesions with provisional stenting, FKB had no significant impact on MACE but was associated with a mild reduction in the incidence of the LOCO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ovidio De Filippo
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Jeehoon Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tineke H Pinxterhuis
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, BMS Faculty, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Hyun Kuk Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Chosun University Hospital, University of Chosun College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Alessio Mattesini
- Cardiologia Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Yun-Kyeong Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Raffaele Piccolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Hyun-Jong Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Wojciech Wańha
- Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Bernardo Cortese
- Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare, Milan, Italy and DCB Academy, Milan, Italy
- University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Seung Hwan Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Leor Perl
- Cardiology Department, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Seung-Ho Hur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Mario Iannaccone
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Turin, Italy
| | - Woo Jung Chun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Antonio Greco
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Attilio Leone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Giulio Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Javier Escaned
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University of Madrid and CIBER-CV, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonino Carmeci
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Patti
- University of Eastern Piedmont "Amedeo Avogadro", Novara, Italy
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Clemens von Birgelen
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, BMS Faculty, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gaetano Maria de Ferrari
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nguyen Ngoc Dang H, Viet Luong T, Cong Pham N, Thi Nguyen Tran H, Anh Hoang T, Anh Ho B, Chi Doan T, Minh Nguyen H. Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2025; 4:102500. [PMID: 40231054 PMCID: PMC11993871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
Background Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) present significant challenges in interventional cardiology, especially in low and middle-income countries like Vietnam. While the double-kissing (DK) crush technique is gaining attention for its potential benefits, its efficacy and safety compared with provisional stenting (PS) in the Vietnamese population remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the DK crush technique in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with those of PS, providing essential data to inform clinical decision-making in settings with limited resources. Methods This prospective cohort study included 58 patients with CBL, 33 patients undergoing the DK crush technique and 25 receiving PS. Clinical follow-up at 1, 3, 9, and 12 months assessed MACE, including cardiovascular disease-related death, acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke. Results Post-percutaneous coronary intervention side branch diameter stenosis in the DK crush group was 5.64% ± 5.80%, significantly lower than the PS group (48.2% ± 28.5%; P < .001). One-year follow-up data revealed greater MACE reduction in the DK crush group (91% MACE-free vs 72% in the PS group; P = .03; hazard ratio [HR], 3.689; 95% CI, 1.034-13.160). However, the DK crush technique had longer procedural times (91.1 vs 54.6 minutes) and required higher contrast and radiation doses (P < .01). Conclusions Although DK crush requires longer procedure times and greater radiation exposure, it results in greater MACE reduction than does PS in patients with CBL. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and limitations of both techniques, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thang Viet Luong
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Nhut Cong Pham
- Intervention Cardiology Department, Khanh Hoa General Hospital, Khanh Hoa, Vietnam
| | - Hieu Thi Nguyen Tran
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Tien Anh Hoang
- Cardiovascular Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Binh Anh Ho
- Cardiovascular Center, Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Thang Chi Doan
- Cardiovascular Center, Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Hung Minh Nguyen
- Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Ha Noi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdelghani M, Taha S, Shoeib O, Hamzaraj K, Emam AY, Elmaghraby KM, Elsoudi M, Abdelshafy M, de Winter RJ, Elguindy A, Hemetsberger R, Hassan A. Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to the Left Main Coronary Artery. Am J Cardiol 2025; 238:78-84. [PMID: 39653306 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Revised: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/26/2024]
Abstract
Patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the left main (LM) coronary artery in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were not adequately studied in the era of modern PCI. We investigated early and long-term outcomes of these patients, especially those with a true LM bifurcation stenosis. The Left Main Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome (LIMACS) is a multicenter registry that enrolled patients who underwent PCI to unprotected LM disease in the setting of ACS using a drug-eluting stent. The study included 360 patients (age 65 ± 12 years, men 74%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction 65%). During index hospitalization, 25% of patients developed cardiogenic shock and 15% died. Cardiogenic shock (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] 26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7 to 93) and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade <3 flow (adjOR 7, 95% CI 1.6 to 31) were associated with in-hospital mortality. The 3-year mortality (37%) correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (adjHR 2.4 [1.4 to 4.2]), Killip class II to IV at presentation (adjHR 1.7 [1.02 to 2.8]), LM culprit (adjHR 1.7 [1.04 to 2.8]), true LM bifurcation stenosis (adjHR 1.8[1.1 to 2.9]), final TIMI grade <3 flow (adjHR 3.2 [1.7 to 5.8]), and radial access (adjHR 0.58 [0.38 to 0.99]). In patients with true LM bifurcation stenosis (n = 127), 2-stent strategy was adopted in 60% and was associated with lower 3-year mortality or repeat revascularization than 1-stent strategy (48% vs 69%, p = 0.012). In conclusion, patients who undergo PCI to the LM in the setting of an ACS sustain high adverse event rates. Hemodynamic status, LM culprit lesion, femoral access, and failure to restore normal flow are major determinants of adverse outcomes. In patients with LM true bifurcation lesions, outcomes are impaired, especially with 1-stent strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abdelghani
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt; Cardiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Sohar Hospital, Sohar, Oman; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Salma Taha
- Department of Cardiology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Osama Shoeib
- Department of Cardiology, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Kevin Hamzaraj
- Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Amr Y Emam
- Department of Cardiology, Aswan Heart Centre, Aswan, Egypt
| | | | - Mohamed Elsoudi
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Abdelshafy
- Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Cardiology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Ahmed Elguindy
- Department of Cardiology, Aswan Heart Centre, Aswan, Egypt
| | - Rayyan Hemetsberger
- Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ahmed Hassan
- Department of Cardiology, Aswan Heart Centre, Aswan, Egypt; Department of Cardiology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi KH, Nam C, Bruno F, Cho Y, De Luca L, Kang J, Mattesini A, Song YB, Truffa A, Kim H, Wańha W, Chun WJ, Gili S, Helft G, Han SH, Cortese B, Lee CH, Escaned J, Yoon H, Chieffo A, Hahn J, Gallone G, Choi S, De Ferrari G, Koo B, Quadri G, Hur S, D'Ascenzo F, Gwon H, de Filippo O. Differential Prognosis of True Bifurcation Lesions According to Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Location and Treatment Strategy. J Am Heart Assoc 2025; 14:e037657. [PMID: 39895551 PMCID: PMC12074771 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.124.037657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although true bifurcation lesions are associated with a high risk of procedural complications, the differential prognostic implications of percutaneous coronary intervention for true bifurcations according to lesion location are unclear. This study aimed to identify whether clinical outcomes of true bifurcation lesions differed between left main coronary artery (LM) and non-LM bifurcations and to determine the optimal treatment strategy for subtypes of bifurcation lesions in the current-generation drug-eluting stent era. METHODS The ULTRA-BIFURCAT (Combined Insights From the Unified COBIS III, RAIN, and ULTRA Registries) was created by merging 3 bifurcation-dedicated registries from Korea and Italy. For this, 6548 patients treated with bifurcation lesions were stratified by lesion location and subtype. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) at 800 days. RESULTS In patients with an LM bifurcation, those with a true bifurcation had a significantly higher risk of a MACE than those with a nontrue bifurcation (20.2% versus 13.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.11-1.86]; P=0.006). Conversely, there was no significant difference in the risk of a MACE according to true versus nontrue bifurcation in patients with non-LM bifurcation lesions (9.0% versus 8.8%; adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.82-1.27]; P=0.849). For LM true bifurcations, MACE rates were comparable between 1-stent and 2-stent strategies, whereas for LM nontrue bifurcations, the 2-stent strategy was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACEs than the 1-stent strategy. No significant differences in the risk of MACEs were observed in non-LM bifurcation lesions according to lesion subtype or treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes were worse for LM true bifurcation lesions than non-LM true bifurcation lesions. A provisional 1-stent strategy should be the preferred approach for treating LM nontrue bifurcation lesions. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03068494, NCT03544294, and NCT05205148.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Chang‐Wook Nam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKeimyung University Dongsan HospitalDaeguRepublic of Korea
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | - Yun‐Kyeong Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKeimyung University Dongsan HospitalDaeguRepublic of Korea
| | - Leonardo De Luca
- Division of CardiologyFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoPaviaItaly
| | - Jeehoon Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | | | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | | | - Hyo‐Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Wojciech Wańha
- Cardiology and Structural Heart DiseasesMedical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - Woo Jung Chun
- Department of Internal MedicineSamsung Changwon HospitalChangwonRepublic of Korea
| | | | - Gerard Helft
- INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière (AP‐HP)Sorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Seung Hwan Han
- Department of Internal MedicineGachon University Gil HospitalIncheonRepublic of Korea
| | | | - Cheol Hyun Lee
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | - Javier Escaned
- Hospital Clínico San CarlosIDISSC, and Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Hyuck‐Jun Yoon
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | | | - Joo‐Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Guglielmo Gallone
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | - Seung‐Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Gaetano De Ferrari
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | - Bon‐Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | | | - Seung‐Ho Hur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineKeimyung University Dongsan HospitalDaeguRepublic of Korea
| | - Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| | - Hyeon‐Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Ovidio de Filippo
- Department of Internal MedicineCittà della Salute e della ScienzaTurinItaly
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lalani K, Rao MS, Dhanse S, Devasia T, Kareem H, Paramasivam G. Shepherd's Crook Curve: A Novel Technique for Angulated Side Branch Access in Bifurcation Angioplasty. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2024; 20:59-64. [PMID: 39131797 PMCID: PMC11312719 DOI: 10.14797/mdcvj.1413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronary intervention involving the region of bifurcation remains a challenging issue for the cardiologist as well as a complication. A number of factors including the angulation of side branch with the main branch determines the success. Though provisional strategy remains the best option in bifurcation intervention, at times a two-stent strategy cannot be avoided. We report a case in which percutaneous coronary intervention was performed on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) at its bifurcation with a major diagonal branch (> 2.5 mm). The ostium of the diagonal was diseased, and the branch took off from the LAD at an unfavorable angle (> 120°). We describe the use of the "shepherd's crook wire curve" approach, a modification of the reverse wire technique, which allowed us to successfully wire, dilate, and protect the diagonal and so named to reflect its resemblance to the shape of a shepherd's crook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanhai Lalani
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Suheil Dhanse
- Horizon Prime Hospital, Thane, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tom Devasia
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Ganesh Paramasivam
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elsheikh AN, Elsaeid A, Sharafeldin S, Elshedoudy S, ElGendy E. Early effect of different bifurcation techniques on left ventricular mechanics in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Egypt Heart J 2024; 76:81. [PMID: 38955907 PMCID: PMC11219646 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00502-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bifurcation lesions are prevalent amongst patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent consensus commends a conservative (provisional) approach when managing the side branch. Here, the aim was to explore the immediate impact of different bifurcation techniques (one stent and two stent strategies) on left ventricular LV) myocardial functions using speckle tracking echocardiography in patients subjected to elective PCI. Sixty two consecutive patients diagnosed with coronary bifurcation lesion (CBL) were enrolled. Patients were categorized into: one-stent strategy (Provisional group, n = 44) and a two-stent strategy (TAP, DK crush, or Culotte technique, n = 18), based on the coronary bifurcation site, angle, side branch diameter and Medina classification. LVEF%, regional and global longitudinal strain (GLS), and E/E' were measured before and within 24 h post PCI. RESULTS In both provisional and 2- stent technique, the mitral inflow velocities and mitral annular velocities showed improvement with significant reduction in E/e' (P < 0.03 and P < 0.001) respectively while LVEF% did not change. There were no significant changes in any other echo parameters post PCI. In provisional group, there were significant improvements in LAD (P < 0.001), RCA (P < 0.01) territories and GLS (P < 0.01). Δ LAD was expressively higher (34.5%) compared with Δ LCX (9.6%) and ΔRCA (25.4%), P < 0.001, P < 0.01 respectively. In the 2-stent technique group, there were significant improvements in peak longitudinal strain of LAD territory (P < 0.01), RCA territory (P < 0.01) and GLS (P < 0.01) respectively. Δ LAD territory was significantly higher in provisional group in comparison with the 2- stent technique group. Δ GLS was correlated inversely to Gensini score in provisional group and to the number of vessel diseased in 2-stent technique group. CONCLUSION PCI of the bifurcation lesion positively impact myocardial function. Both bifurcation techniques improve LV mechanical properties using 2D strain imaging while LV EF% remains unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Nasser Elsheikh
- Cardiology Department, Tanta University, 55-ElGish Street, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt.
| | - Ayman Elsaeid
- Cardiology Department, Tanta University, 55-ElGish Street, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
| | - Samia Sharafeldin
- Cardiology Department, Tanta University, 55-ElGish Street, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
| | - Sahar Elshedoudy
- Cardiology Department, Tanta University, 55-ElGish Street, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
| | - Ehab ElGendy
- Cardiology Department, Tanta University, 55-ElGish Street, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Volet C, Puricel S, Cook ST, di Cicco P, Faucherre Y, Arroyo D, Togni M, Cook S. Proximal optimization technique and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: POTENTIAL-LM. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 103:417-424. [PMID: 38297989 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal stent deployment in left main (LM) bifurcation is paramount, and incomplete stent apposition may cause major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Bench studies show that the proximal optimization technique (POT) provides the best stent apposition. AIMS We aimed to investigate the impact of POT on clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected LM (ULM) disease at our institution. METHODS We identified 162 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ULM coronary disease in the Cardio-FR database. Out of these, 99 (61%) had undergone POT, while 63 patients were treated without POT. The primary outcome was the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE) of cardiac death, target-bifurcation myocardial infarction and target-bifurcation revascularization at maximal follow-up. RESULTS Mean age was 76 years, and 69% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Mean follow-up was 2.25 years (822 days). The BOCE occurred in 43 (27%) of which 20 (20%) in the POT group and 23 (37%) in the no-POT group (p = 0.009). Cardiac death occurred in 15 (15%) patients in the POT- and 17 (27%) in no-POT group (p = 0.26). Target bifurcation revascularization occurred in 4 (4%) patients in the POT- and 6 (10%) patients in the no-POT group (p = 0.19). POT In the multivariate analysis, POT was the strongest parameter and was associated with BOCE, cardiac death, occurrence of any revascularization and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION The POT improves clinical outcomes. These findings strongly support the systematic use of POT in patients undergoing ULM-PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corentin Volet
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Serban Puricel
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Selma T Cook
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Diego Arroyo
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Mario Togni
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Cook
- Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Stankovic G, Burzotta F, Kassab GS, Lassen JF, Darremont O, Garg S, Koo BK, Holm NR, Johnson TW, Pan M, Chatzizisis YS, Banning AP, Chieffo A, Dudek D, Hildick-Smith D, Garot J, Henry TD, Dangas G, Stone G, Krucoff MW, Cutlip D, Mehran R, Wijns W, Sharif F, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 19:e807-e831. [PMID: 35583108 PMCID: PMC10687650 DOI: 10.4244/eij-e-22-00018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Lunardi
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of -Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Yves Louvard
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France
| | | | - Goran Stankovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of -Serbia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, -Belgrade, -Serbia
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ghassan S Kassab
- California Medical Innovation Institute, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jens F Lassen
- Department of Cardiology B, Odense Universitets Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Scot Garg
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Niels R Holm
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Thomas W Johnson
- Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHSFT & University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Pan
- IMIBIC, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Yiannis S Chatzizisis
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Adrian P Banning
- Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Division of Cardiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Second Department of Cardiology Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Jérome Garot
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France
| | - Timothy D Henry
- Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - George Dangas
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregg Stone
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mitchell W Krucoff
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald Cutlip
- Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Baim Institute for Clinical Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - William Wijns
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of -Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and CURAM, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Faisal Sharif
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of -Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of -Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- International Centre for Circulatory Health, NHLI, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yoshinobu Onuma
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of -Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dillen DMM, Vlaar PJ, Vermeer AJE, Paradies V, van Kuijk JP, Vink MA, Oemrawsingh RM, Hofma SH, Magro M, Remkes WS, de Smet BJGL, van Rees JB, Somi S, Halim J, Zimmermann FM, Wijnbergen IF, Tijssen JGP, Tonino PAL, Teeuwen K. Bifurcation PCI with a hybrid strategy with drug- eluting balloons versus a stepwise provisional two- stent strategy: Rationale and design of the hybrid DEB study. Am Heart J 2023; 266:168-175. [PMID: 37806333 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The optimal treatment strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex and remains a subject of debate. Current guidelines advise a stepwise provisional approach with optional two-stent strategy. However, a two-stent strategy, both upfront and stepwise provisional, is technically demanding. Therefore, there is increasing interest in the use of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) in bifurcation lesions, mainly after a provisional approach with unsatisfactory result of the side branch. Some small pilot studies already showed that the use of DEB in bifurcation lesions is safe and feasible. However, a randomized comparison of this hybrid DEB strategy with a two-stent strategy is currently lacking. TRIAL DESIGN The Hybrid DEB study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigating noninferiority of a hybrid DEB approach, using a combination of a drug-eluting stent (DES) in the main vessel and DEB in the side branch, compared to stepwise provisional two-stent strategy in patients with true bifurcation lesions. A total of 500 patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions, treated with a stepwise provisional approach and an unsatisfactory result of the side branch after main vessel stenting (≥ 70% stenosis and/or < thrombolysis in myocardial infarction III flow), will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either treatment with a DEB or with a DES in the side branch. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of the occurrence of all-cause death, periprocedural or spontaneous myocardial infarction and/or target vessel revascularization at the anticipated median 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION The Hybrid DEB study will compare in a multicenter, randomized fashion a hybrid DEB approach with a stepwise provisional two-stent strategy in patients with true bifurcation lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT05731687.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daimy M M Dillen
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Pieter Jan Vlaar
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Amy J E Vermeer
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Valeria Paradies
- Department of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Peter van Kuijk
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten A Vink
- Department of Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rohit M Oemrawsingh
- Department of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd H Hofma
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Magro
- Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth- TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart J G L de Smet
- Department of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Samer Somi
- Department of Cardiology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Halim
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Inge F Wijnbergen
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jan G P Tijssen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim A L Tonino
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Teeuwen
- Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Servoz C, Matta A, Bataille V, Philippe J, Laszlo L, Blanco S, Elbaz M, Bouisset F, Campelo-Parada F, Carrié D, Lhermusier T. Outcomes of Provisional Stenting With Versus Without Side Branch Intervention in Patients With Bifurcation Lesion-Related ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol 2023; 208:190-194. [PMID: 37871531 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
To date, the best approach to coronary bifurcation lesion remains unsettled, and the parameters to guide side branch ballooning or stenting are not yet defined. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes after provisional stenting with versus without side branch intervention. A cohort was conducted on 132 patients who underwent coronary angiography at Toulouse University Hospital for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with large culprit nonleft main coronary bifurcation lesion. Study participants were divided into 2 groups depending on the performance or not of a side branch intervention. We observed the living status at 1-year after hospital discharge. Side branch intervention by balloon inflation or final balloon kissing technique was performed in 34.1% of study participants. At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 7.8 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1 to 15), and although it seemed higher in the side branch intervention group (10 per 100 person-years [95% CI 3.8 to 26.7] vs 6.6 per 100 persons-years [95% CI 2.8 to 15.9]), the survival analyses showed no differences in survival outcomes (hazard ratio side branch intervention 1.55 [0.42 to 5.78], p = 0.513). In conclusion, in the setting of a coronary bifurcation causing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, simple provisional stenting without side branch intervention showed a low mortality rate and no differences in the 1-year survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Servoz
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - Anthony Matta
- Department of cardiology, Civilians Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Vincent Bataille
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - John Philippe
- Department of cardiology, Civilians Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Levai Laszlo
- Department of cardiology, Civilians Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Stéphanie Blanco
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Meyer Elbaz
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Bouisset
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Didier Carrié
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bujak K, Verardi FM, Arevalos V, Gabani R, Spione F, Rajwa P, Milasinovic D, Stankovic G, Gasior M, Sabaté M, Brugaletta S. Clinical outcomes following different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 19:664-675. [PMID: 37533321 PMCID: PMC10587845 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-23-00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy still exists regarding the optimal treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. AIMS We aimed to analyse the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare outcomes following different bifurcation stenting techniques. METHODS We systematically searched for RCTs comparing different techniques published up to July 2022. We then conducted a pairwise meta-analysis to compare outcomes between provisional stenting (PS) versus upfront 2-stent techniques. Moreover, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare all strategies with each other. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS Twenty-four RCTs (6,890 patients) analysed PS, T-stenting, double-kissing (DK)-crush, crush, or culotte stenting. The pairwise meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the PS and 2-stent techniques. However, the prespecified sensitivity analysis, which included RCTs exclusively enrolling patients with true bifurcation lesions, showed a lower rate of MACE following 2-stent techniques, and meta-regression indicated that a longer side branch lesion was associated with a greater benefit from the 2-stent strategy, which was the most apparent in RCTs with a mean lesion length >11 mm. NMA revealed that DK-crush was associated with the lowest MACE rate (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.62; p<0.01; PS as a reference). CONCLUSIONS Overall, 2-stent techniques were not significantly better than PS in terms of clinical outcomes. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that there might be a benefit of a 2-stent approach in selected patients with true bifurcation lesions, especially in the case of long side branch lesions. An NMA revealed that DK-crush was associated with the lowest event rates when compared with other techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Bujak
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Filippo Maria Verardi
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Victor Arevalos
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rami Gabani
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Spione
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dejan Milasinovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Goran Stankovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mariusz Gasior
- 3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Manel Sabaté
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salvatore Brugaletta
- Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Choi KH, Bruno F, Cho YK, De Luca L, Song YB, Kang J, Mattesini A, Gwon HC, Truffa A, Kim HS, Wańha W, Chun WJ, Gili S, Hur SH, Helft G, Han SH, Cortese B, Lee CH, Escaned J, Yoon HJ, Chieffo A, Hahn JY, Gallone G, Choi SH, De Ferrari G, Koo BK, Quadri G, D'Ascenzo F, Nam CW, de Filippo O. Comparison of Outcomes Between 1- and 2-Stent Techniques for Medina Classification 0.0.1 Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:2083-2093. [PMID: 37565964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although Medina 0.0.1 bifurcation lesions are often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in real-world practice, the optimal revascularization strategy for this lesion is uncertain. OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between 1- and 2-stent strategies in patients treated with PCI for Medina 0.0.1 bifurcation lesions. METHODS The extended BIFURCAT (Combined Insights From the Unified RAIN [Very Thin Stents for Patients with Left Main or Bifurcation in Real Life] and COBIS [Coronary Bifurcation Stenting] Bifurcation Registries) registry was obtained by patient-level merging the dedicated bifurcation COBIS II, III, and RAIN registries. Among 8,434 patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI, 345 (4.1%) with Medina 0.0.1 lesions were selected for the current analysis. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis) at 800 days. RESULTS In the total population, 209 patients (60.6%) received PCI with a 1-stent strategy and the remaining 136 patients (39.4%) with a 2-stent strategy. There was a tendency for higher use of a 1-stent strategy over time (36.0%, 47.4%, and 90.4% in 2003-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2017, respectively; P for trend < 0.001). For the treatment of Medina 0.0.1 lesions, there was no significant difference in the risk of MACE between 1- and 2-stent strategies (1 stent vs 2 stent, 14.3% vs 13.9%; HR: 1.034; 95% CI: 0.541-1.977; P = 0.92). The risk of MACE was also not significantly different when stratifying into 3 groups (1-stent crossover only, 1-stent with strut opening, and 2-stent strategy). CONCLUSIONS In patients with a Medina 0.0.1 type bifurcation lesion, PCI with a 1-stent strategy showed comparable outcomes to that of a 2-stent strategy. (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting II [COBIS II]; NCT01642992; Coronary Bifurcation Stenting III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494; Very Thin Stents for Patients with Left Main or Bifurcation in Real Life [RAIN]; NCT03544294).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Yun-Kyeong Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Leonardo De Luca
- Department of Cardiosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeehoon Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Alessio Mattesini
- Cardiologia Interventistica Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wojciech Wańha
- Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Woo Jung Chun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Seung-Ho Hur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Gerard Helft
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Seung Hwan Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Cheol Hyun Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Hyuck-Jun Yoon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Guglielmo Gallone
- Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gaetano De Ferrari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Giorgio Quadri
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale di Rivoli, Rivoli, Italy
| | - Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ovidio de Filippo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Doolub G, Iannaccone M, Rab T, Routledge H, Aminian A, Chevalier B, Hildick-Smith D, Jacobs L, Kobo O, Roguin A, Chieffo A, Mamas MA. Sex-based treatment and outcomes for coronary bifurcation stenting: A report from the e-ULTIMASTER registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:430-439. [PMID: 37464969 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions can be technically challenging and is associated with higher risk. There is little data on sex-based differences in strategy and outcomes in bifurcation PCI. AIMS We sought to assess whether differences exist between women and men in the treatment and outcomes of bifurcation PCI. METHODS We collected data on 4006 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI, from the e-ULTIMASTER study, a prospective, multicentre study enrolling patients from 2014 to 2018. We divided the bifurcation cohort according to sex, with 1-year follow-up of outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF], target vessel failure [TVF], and patient-oriented composite endpoint [POCE]). FINDINGS Women were older (69.2 ± 10.9 years vs. 64.4 ± 11.0 years), with a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities. For true and non-true bifurcation lesions, women and men were equally likely to undergo a single stent approach (true: 63.2% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.79, non-true: 95.4% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.32), with similar rates of final kissing balloon (FKB) (37.2% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.36) and proximal optimization (POT) (34.4% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.93) in cases where two stents were used. Lastly, after propensity score matching, there was no difference between women and men in the incidence of the composite endpoints of TLF (5.5% vs. 5.2%, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.77-1.44], p = 0.75), TVF (6.2% vs. 6.3%, RR 0.99 [95% CI 0.74-1.32], p = 0.96), and POCE (9.9% vs. 9.5%, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.83-1.31], p = 0.70). CONCLUSION In this contemporary, real-world study of bifurcation PCI, we report no difference in stent strategy between women and men, with similar outcomes at 1-year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemina Doolub
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | - Tanveer Rab
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Adel Aminian
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Bernard Chevalier
- Ramsay Générale de Santé, ICPS, Hôpital Jacques Cartier, Massy, France
| | - David Hildick-Smith
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Lotte Jacobs
- European Medical and Clinical Division, Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ofer Kobo
- Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre, Hadera, Israel
| | | | | | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Calik AN, Cader FA, Rafflenbeul E, Okutucu S, Khan SR, Canbolat IP, Sinan UY, Alasnag MA. An Approach to Non-left Main Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2023; 17:e10. [PMID: 39493947 PMCID: PMC11526486 DOI: 10.15420/usc.2022.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Bifurcated anatomical locations in the arterial tree, such as coronary artery bifurcations, are prone to develop obstructive atherosclerotic lesions due to the pro-atherogenic low wall shear stress. The percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions is among the most challenging complex coronary interventions, including different multistep stenting strategies. Even though provisional side branch (SB) stenting is recommended as the primary approach in most cases, the debate continues between provisional SB and upfront two-stent strategies, particularly in complex bifurcations consisting of a significantly diseased SB that supplies a crucial myocardial territory. This review will highlight the importance of understanding the bifurcation philosophy and provide an individual algorithmic approach to find the optimal treatment strategy for each patient with a non-left main coronary bifurcation lesion. Considering the most recent scientific evidence, the advantages and disadvantages of each stenting technique and the role of intracoronary imaging to optimize bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Nazmi Calik
- Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research HospitalIstanbul, Turkey
| | - F Aaysha Cader
- Department of Cardiology, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research InstituteDhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Erik Rafflenbeul
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Schön KlinikHamburg Eilbek, Germany
| | - Sercan Okutucu
- Department of Cardiology, Memorial HospitalAnkara, Turkey
| | - Saidur Rahman Khan
- Department of Cardiology, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research InstituteDhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Umit Yasar Sinan
- Department of Cardiology, Istanbul University – Cerrahpaşa, Institute of CardiologyIstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mirvat A Alasnag
- Department of Cardiology, King Fahd Armed Forces HospitalJeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xu K, Jiang Y, Yang W, Zhang W, Wang D, Zhao Y, Zheng S, Hao Z, Shen L, Jiang L, Qiu X, Escaned J, Tu S, Shen L, He B. Post-procedural and long-term functional outcomes of jailed side branches in stented coronary bifurcation lesions assessed with side branch Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1217069. [PMID: 37600052 PMCID: PMC10435891 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In coronary bifurcation lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a 1-stent strategy, the occurrence of side branch (SB) compromise may lead to long-term myocardial ischemia in the SB territory. Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) is a novel angiography-based approach estimating fractional flow reserve from a single angiographic view, and thus is more feasible to assess SB compromise in routine practice. However, its association with long-term SB coronary blood flow remains unknown. Methods A total of 146 patients with 313 non-left main bifurcation lesions receiving 1-stent strategy with drug-eluting stents was included in this retrospective study. These lesions had post-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 in SBs, and documented angiographic images of index procedure and 6- to 24-month angiographic follow-up. Post-procedural SB μQFR was calculated. Long-term SB coronary blood flow was quantified with the TIMI grading system using angiograms acquired at angiographic follow-up. Results At follow-up, 8 (2.6%), 16 (5.1%), 61 (19.5%), and 228 (72.8%) SBs had a TIMI flow grade of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The incidences of long-term SB TIMI flow grade ≤1 and ≤2 both tended to decrease across the tertiles of post-procedural SB μQFR. The receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicated the post-procedural SB μQFR ≤0.77 was the optimal cut-off value to identify long-term SB TIMI flow grade ≤1 (specificity, 37.50%; sensitivity, 87.20%; area under the curve, 0.6673; P = 0.0064), and it was independently associated with 2.57-fold increased risk (adjusted OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.02-7.25; P = 0.045) in long-term SB TIMI flow grade ≤1 after adjustment. Discussion Post-procedural SB μQFR was independently associated with increased risk in impaired SB TIMI flow at long-term follow-up. Further investigations should focus on whether PCI optimization based on μQFR may contribute to improve SB flow in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weifeng Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shunwen Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziyong Hao
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lisheng Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingbiao Qiu
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Javier Escaned
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Shengxian Tu
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linghong Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ben He
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kalinin RE, Suchkov IA, Karpov AV, Ilyasov IB, Shanaev IN. Reasons and frequency of transition to a double-stent technique when correcting bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries in patients with acute coronary syndrome. GREKOV'S BULLETIN OF SURGERY 2023; 182:29-37. [DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-2-29-37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
The objective was to estimate the risk and predictors of intraoperative transition from a single-stent technique of correction of bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries to a double-stent technique.METHODS AND MATHERIALS. The study included 49 patients (35 men – 71.4 % and 14 women – 28.6 %) with acute coronary syndrome, whose coronary angiography revealed non-stem bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries. The patients were operated with single- (Provisional) and double- (Culotte and TAR) stent techniques. Three patients had two bifurcation lesions at once. Thus, 52 bifurcations were included in the study. The average age of patients was 62±8 years. The lateral branch was affected in 34.6 % of cases. A blood clot in the bifurcation area was visualized in 15.4 % of cases. The study is a prospective analytical one. Statistical data processing was carried out using the chi-square test. The statistically significant value was considered p<0.05.RESULTS. In Y-type bifurcation, kissing dilation was performed in 50% of cases, and stent implantation into the lateral branch - in 23.8% of cases (47.6% of cases where kissing dilation was performed). In T-type bifurcation, kissing dilation was required in 33.3% of cases, and the transition to double-stent technique was required in 11.1% of cases (33.3% of cases where kissing dilation was performed (p=0.610)). With the initially affected lateral branch, kissing dilation was required in 88.2 % of cases, and stenting of the lateral branch was required in 47.1 % of cases (53.3% of cases where kissing dilation was performed). With an intact lateral branch, kissing dilation was required in 26.5 % of cases, the second stent was needed in 8.8 % of cases (33.3% of cases where kissing dilation was performed (p<0.001)). In the presence of a blood clot in the bifurcation area, the need for kissing dilation appeared in 75% of cases, and the need for double-stent technique – in 12.5% of cases (20% of cases where kissing dilation was performed).CONCLUSIONS. When using the Provisional techniques, the kissing dilation was required in 47.1 % of cases. Expansion of the scope of surgical intervention to double-stent technique was required in 21.6 % of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. E. Kalinin
- Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I. P. Pavlov
| | - I. A. Suchkov
- Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I. P. Pavlov
| | - A. V. Karpov
- Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I. P. Pavlov; City hospital № 6 named after G. A. Zakharin
| | | | - I. N. Shanaev
- Ryazan State Medical University named after academician I. P. Pavlov
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aedma SK, Naik A, Kanmanthareddy A. Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence. Curr Cardiol Rev 2023; 19:e060422203185. [PMID: 35388761 PMCID: PMC10201883 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x18666220406113517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Given the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one. OBJECTIVE Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objectively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. METHODS We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. RESULTS In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading. CONCLUSION Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surya Kiran Aedma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA
| | - Anant Naik
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, 61820, USA
| | - Arun Kanmanthareddy
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, USA
- CHI Health Heart Institute, Omaha, Nebraska, 68124, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, 68124, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sheiban I, Ge Z, Kan J, Zhang JJ, Santoso T, Munawar M, Ye F, Tian N, Chen SL. Provisional stenting with side branch rescue stenting is associated with increased 3-year target lesion failure in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary bifurcation lesions. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:910313. [PMID: 36304537 PMCID: PMC9595024 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.910313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Provisional stenting (PS) is the main treatment for a majority of coronary bifurcation lesion and includes PS with 1-stent and PS with 2-stent. However, the treatment difference between PS with 1-stent and with 2-stent remains unclear in patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary bifurcation lesions. Materials and methods Overall, 820 ACS patients with Medina 1,1,1 or 0,1,1 coronary bifurcation lesion who had completed 3-year follow-up were included and assigned to the PS with 1-stent (n = 519) or the PS with 2-stent (n = 301) according to the use of final stenting technique. The primary endpoint was the target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years since stenting procedures. Results At 3-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 85 (16.4%) patients in the PS with 1-stent group and 69 (22.9%) in the PS with 2-stent group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–2.17, p = 0.021), mainly driven by a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the PS with 2-stent group (13.0% vs. 8.3%, HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.04–2.61, p = 0.033). Complex bifurcations, side branch (SB) pretreatment, intravascular imaging guidance, and hyperlipidemia were the four predictors for 3-year TLF. SB pretreatment was associated with increased 3-year TLR, leading to an extremely higher 3-year TLF. Conclusion Provisional with 2-stent for patients with ACS is associated with a higher rate of 3-year TLF, mainly due to increased requirement of revascularization. SB pretreatment should be avoided for simple bifurcation lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imad Sheiban
- Division of Cardiology, Pederzoli Hospital-Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Zhen Ge
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Kan
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Jie Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Teguh Santoso
- Division of Cardiology, Medistra Hospital, University of Indonesia Medical School, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Munawar
- Division of Cardiology, Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Fei Ye
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Nailiang Tian
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China,*Correspondence: Shao-Liang Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ge Z, Gao XF, Zhan JJ, Chen SL. Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. Interv Cardiol Clin 2022; 11:405-417. [PMID: 36243486 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) is still technically demanding, mainly because of higher rates of both acute and chronic complication as compared with non-CBLs. Although provisional stenting (PS) is considered as the preferred strategy for most of the CBLs, a systematic two-stent technique (double kissing [DK] crush) should be considered in patients with complex left main (LM)-CBLs or non-LM-CBLs stratified by the DEFINITION criteria. Intracoronary imaging and/or physiologic evaluation should be used to optimize CBLs intervention. PCI with DES for the treatment of CBLs is technically demanding, mainly because of higher rates of both acute and chronic complication as compared with non-CBLs. PS is a default strategy for most of the CBLs. Double kissing (DK) crush is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with PS in patients with complex LM-CBLs or non-LM-CBLs stratified by the DEFINITION criteria. Intracoronary imaging and/or physiologic evaluation are useful tools to guide the treatment of CBLs. The use of drug-coated balloons in CBLs needs further data to support the clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Ge
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiao-Fei Gao
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun-Jie Zhan
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fujisaki T, Kuno T, Numasawa Y, Takagi H, Briasoulis A, Kwan T, Latib A, Tamis-Holland J, Bangalore S. Provisional or 2-Stent Technique for Bifurcation Lesions in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2022; 1:100410. [PMID: 39131456 PMCID: PMC11307680 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background For bifurcating coronary lesions, a provisional stent technique is recommended compared with a routine 2-stent strategy. However, much of these data are from trials involving first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) or bare-metal stents where the risk of restenosis with the 2-stent technique is higher. We investigated the efficacy of various 2-stent techniques versus a provisional stent technique for bifurcation lesions with newer-generation DES. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched through May 2022 for randomized control trials investigating bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention techniques using newer-generation DES, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at the longest reported follow-up time. Results Our study identified 13 randomized control trials including 4041 patients. Compared with the provisional technique, 2-stent techniques significantly decreased MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97; P = .03), target vessel myocardial infarction (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71; P = .002), and target vessel revascularization (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P = .02). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.62-1.45; P = .79), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.49-1.38; P = .45), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.73-1.37; P = .99), and stent thrombosis (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.52-1.44; P = .58). Of the 2-stent techniques, the double kissing crush technique significantly decreased MACE and target lesion revascularization than other 2-stent techniques. Conclusions In this era of newer-generation DES, a 2-stent approach, especially the double kissing crush technique, is superior to a provisional stenting technique for a bifurcation lesion, with a significant reduction in MACE, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujisaki
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, New York, New York
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Toshiki Kuno
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York
| | - Yohei Numasawa
- Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Hisato Takagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Heart Failure and Transplant, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Tak Kwan
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Health Greenwich Village/Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Azeem Latib
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline Tamis-Holland
- Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, New York
| | - Sripal Bangalore
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang Q, Huan H, Han Y, Liu H, Sun S, Wang B, Wei S. Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2022; 16:11795468221116842. [PMID: 35982991 PMCID: PMC9379967 DOI: 10.1177/11795468221116842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stent placement remains a challenge for coronary bifurcation lesions. While both simple and complex stenting strategies are available, it is unclear which one results in better clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to explore the long-term prognosis following treatment with the 2 stenting strategies. Method Randomized controlled trials found from searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were included in this meta-analysis. The complex stent placement strategy was identified as the control group, and the simple stent placement strategy was identified as the experimental group. Data were synthesized with a random effects model. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was assessed by Jadad scale scores. The clinical endpoints at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were analyzed. Results A total of 11 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2494 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratio [OR] of the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 6 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.35; P = .49, I 2 = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 1 year was 0.61 (95% CI 0.36-1.05; P = .08, I 2 = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 5 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.92; P = .01, I 2 = 0%). Compared with the complex strategy, the simple strategy was associated with a lower incidence of MACEs at 5 years. Conclusion Compared to the complex stenting strategy, the simple stenting strategy can better reduce the occurrence of long-term MACEs for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qun Zhang
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Hengshan Huan
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,The Forth People's Hospital of Linyi, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - Yu Han
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Han Liu
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shukun Sun
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Bailu Wang
- Clinical Trial Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shujian Wei
- Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Key Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation Research of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alasmari A, Iskandar M, Daoulah A, Hersi AS, Alshehri M, Aljohar A, Al Garni T, Abuelatta R, Yousif N, Almahmeed W, Kazim HM, Refaat W, Selim E, Alzahrani B, Alqahtani AH, Ajaz Ghani M, Amin H, Hashmani S, El-Sayed O, Jamjoom A, Hurley WT, Dahdouh Z, Aithal J, Ahmad O, Ramadan M, Ibrahim AM, Elganady A, Qutub MA, Alama MN, Abohasan A, Hassan T, Balghith M, Altnji I, Hussien AF, Abdulhabeeb IAM, Qenawi W, Shawky A, Ghonim AA, Elmahrouk A, Hiremath N, Jameel Naser M, Shawky AM, Lotfi A. One Versus Two Stents Strategies for Unprotected Left Main Intervention: Gulf Left Main Registry. Angiology 2022:33197221121004. [PMID: 35969482 DOI: 10.1177/00033197221121004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The optimal stenting strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease remains debated. This retrospective observational study (Gulf Left Main Registry) analyzed the outcomes of 1 vs 2 stents in patients with unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Overall, 1222 patients were evaluated; 173 had 1 stent and 1049 had 2 stents. The 2-stent group was older with more comorbidities, higher mean SYNTAX scores, and more distal bifurcation lesions. In the 1-stent group, in-hospital events were significant for major bleeding, and better mean creatinine clearance. At median follow-up of 20 months, the 1-stent group was more likely to have target lesion revascularization (TLR). Total mortality was numerically lower in the 1-stent group (.00% vs 2.10%); however, this was not statistically significant (P=.068). Our analysis demonstrates the benefits of a 2-stent approach for ULMCA patients with high SYNTAX scores and lesions in both major side branches, while the potential benefit of a 1-stent approach for less complex ULMCA was also observed. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to definitively demonstrate the optimal approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz Alasmari
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 195017King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mina Iskandar
- Department of Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program, UMass Chan Medical School, 21645Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Amin Daoulah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 195017King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad S Hersi
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, 534885King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Alshehri
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Alwaleed Aljohar
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, 534885King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Turki Al Garni
- Department of Cardiology, 48077Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Reda Abuelatta
- Department of Cardiology, 363886Madinah Cardiac Center, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Nooraldaem Yousif
- Department of Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Center, Awali, 144878Kingdom of Bahrain, Bahrain
| | - Wael Almahmeed
- Heart & Vascular Institute, 284697Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Hameedullah M Kazim
- Department of Cardiology, 37842Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Wael Refaat
- Department of Cardiology, 204603Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Al Hassa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ehab Selim
- Department of Cardiology, 37842Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Badr Alzahrani
- Department of Cardiology, 48077Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman H Alqahtani
- Department of Emergency Medicine,48168King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Ajaz Ghani
- Department of Cardiology, 363886Madinah Cardiac Center, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Haitham Amin
- Department of Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Center, Awali, 144878Kingdom of Bahrain, Bahrain
| | | | - Osama El-Sayed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 195017King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Jamjoom
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 195017King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - William T Hurley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, 2569Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Ziad Dahdouh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 37852King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Jairam Aithal
- Department of Cardiology, Yas Clinic, Khalifa City A, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Osama Ahmad
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 37852King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Ramadan
- Department of Cardiology, 204603Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Al Hassa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M Ibrahim
- Department of Cardiology, 48051Saudi German Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdelmaksoud Elganady
- Department of Cardiology, 124911Dr Erfan and Bagedo General Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed A Qutub
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, 37848King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed N Alama
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, 37848King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulwali Abohasan
- Department of Cardiology, 557798Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Taher Hassan
- Department of Cardiology, 48131Bugshan General Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Balghith
- King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, College of Medicine, 48149King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Issam Altnji
- Department of Cardiology, 58005Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Ireland
| | - Adnan Fathey Hussien
- Department of Cardiology, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim A M Abdulhabeeb
- Department of Cardiology, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Al Jawf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Wael Qenawi
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Shawky
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed A Ghonim
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, 37848King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Elmahrouk
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 195017King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | - Maryam Jameel Naser
- Department of Internal Medicine, 21645Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Abeer M Shawky
- Department of Cardiology, 124911Dr Erfan and Bagedo General Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Amir Lotfi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hildick-Smith D, Arunothayaraj S, Stankovic G, Chen SL. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions. EUROINTERVENTION 2022; 18:e273-e291. [PMID: 35866256 PMCID: PMC9912967 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-21-01065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Bifurcation coronary artery disease is common as the development of atherosclerosis is facilitated by altered endothelial shear stress. Multiple anatomical and physiological factors need to be considered when treating bifurcation lesions. To achieve optimal results, various stenting techniques have been developed, each with benefits and limitations. In this state-of-the-art review we describe technically important characteristics of bifurcation lesions and summarise the evidence supporting contemporary bifurcation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hildick-Smith
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, BN2 5BE Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Sandeep Arunothayaraj
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Goran Stankovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kheifets M, Vons SA, Bental T, Vaknin-Assa H, Greenberg G, Samara A, Codner P, Wittberg G, Talmor Barkan Y, Perl L, Kornowski R, Levi A. Temporal Trends in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:913588. [PMID: 35811722 PMCID: PMC9263118 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.913588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accumulated experience combined with technological advancements in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) over the past four decades, has led to a gradual increase in PCI utilization and complexity. We aimed to investigate the temporal trends in PCI complexity and the outcomes of complex PCI (C-PCI) in our institution. Methods We analyzed 20,301 consecutive PCI procedures performed over a 12-year period. C-PCI was defined as a procedure involving at least one of the following: Chronic total occlusion (CTO), left main (LM), bifurcation or saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI. Four periods of 3-year time intervals were defined (2008–10, 2011–2013, 2014–2016, 2017–2019), and temporal trends in the rate and outcomes of C-PCI within these intervals were studied. Endpoints included mortality and major adverse cardiac events [MACE: death, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 1 year. Results A total of 5,647 (27.8%) C-PCI procedures were performed. The rate of C-PCI has risen significantly since 2,017 (31.2%, p < 0.01), driven mainly by bifurcation and LM interventions (p < 0.01). At 1-year, rates of death, acute MI, TVR and MACE, were all significantly higher in the C-PCI group (8.8 vs. 5.1%, 5.6 vs. 4.5%, 5.5 vs. 4.0%, 17.2 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001 for all, respectively), as compared to the non-complex group. C-PCI preformed in the latter half of the study period (2014–2019) were associated with improved 1-year TVR (4.4% and 4.8% vs. 6.7% and 7.1%, p = 0.01, respectively) and MACE (13.8% and 13.5% vs. 17.3% and 18.2%, p = 0.001, respectively) rates compared to the earlier period (2007–2013). Death rate had not significantly declined with time. Conclusion In the current cohort, we have detected a temporal increase in PCI complexity coupled with improved 1-year clinical outcomes in C-PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Kheifets
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shelly Abigail Vons
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamir Bental
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hana Vaknin-Assa
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Greenberg
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Abed Samara
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Pablo Codner
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Guy Wittberg
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yeela Talmor Barkan
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Leor Perl
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ran Kornowski
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amos Levi
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Stankovic G, Burzotta F, Kassab GS, Lassen JF, Darremont O, Garg S, Koo BK, Holm NR, Johnson TW, Pan M, Chatzizisis YS, Banning A, Chieffo A, Dudek D, Hildick-Smith D, Garot J, Henry TD, Dangas G, Stone GW, Krucoff MW, Cutlip D, Mehran R, Wijns W, Sharif F, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:63-88. [PMID: 35597684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Lunardi
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Yves Louvard
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France
| | | | - Goran Stankovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ghassan S Kassab
- California Medical Innovation Institute, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jens F Lassen
- Department of Cardiology B, Odense Universitets Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Scot Garg
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Niels R Holm
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Thomas W Johnson
- Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHSFT & University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Pan
- IMIBIC, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Yiannis S Chatzizisis
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Adrian Banning
- Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Division of Cardiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Second Department of Cardiology Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Jérome Garot
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France
| | - Timothy D Henry
- Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - George Dangas
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregg W Stone
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mitchell W Krucoff
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald Cutlip
- Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Baim Institute for Clinical Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - William Wijns
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and CURAM, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Faisal Sharif
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; International Centre for Circulatory Health, NHLI, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Yoshinobu Onuma
- Department of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kan J, Zhang JJ, Sheiban I, Santoso T, Munawar M, Tresukosol D, Xu K, Stone GW, Chen SL. 3-Year Outcomes After 2-Stent With Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions Defined by DEFINITION Criteria. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:1310-1320. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
28
|
Alasnag M, Mamas MA. A Frequentist Opting for the Road Less Traveled. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e026446. [PMID: 35722997 PMCID: PMC9238654 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.026446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mirvat Alasnag
- Cardiac CenterKing Fahd Armed Forces CenterJeddahSaudi Arabia
| | - Mamas A. Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research GroupKeele UniversityStoke on TrentUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Park DY, An S, Jolly N, Attanasio S, Yadav N, Rao S, Vij A. Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e025394. [PMID: 35723005 PMCID: PMC9238651 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.025394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Bifurcation lesions account for 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions and represent a complex subset which are associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of restenosis. The ideal bifurcation technique, however, remains elusive. Methods and Results Extensive search of the literature was performed to pull data from randomized clinical trials that met predetermined inclusion criteria. Conventional meta-analysis produced pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of 2-stent technique versus provisional stent on prespecified outcomes. Both frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare bifurcation techniques. A total of 8318 patients were included from 29 randomized clinical trials. Conventional meta-analysis showed no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization between 2-stent techniques and provisional stenting. Frequentist network meta-analysis revealed that double kissing crush was associated with lower cardiac death (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.84), major adverse cardiac events (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39-0.64), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.90), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88), target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization when compared with provisional stenting. Double kissing crush was also superior to other 2-stent techniques, including T-stent or T and protrusion, dedicated bifurcation stent, and culotte. Conclusions Double kissing crush was associated with lower risk of cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization compared with provisional stenting and was superior to other 2-stent techniques. Superiority of 2-stent strategy over provisional stenting was observed in subgroup meta-analysis stratified to side branch lesion length ≥10 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Yong Park
- Department of MedicineJohn H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook CountyChicagoIL
| | - Seokyung An
- Department of Biomedical ScienceSeoul National University Graduate SchoolSeoulKorea
| | - Neeraj Jolly
- Division of CardiologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoIL
| | - Steve Attanasio
- Division of CardiologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoIL
| | - Neha Yadav
- Division of CardiologyCook County HealthChicagoIL
- Division of CardiologyRush Medical CollegeChicagoIL
| | - Sunil Rao
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Health SystemDurhamNC
| | - Aviral Vij
- Division of CardiologyCook County HealthChicagoIL
- Division of CardiologyRush Medical CollegeChicagoIL
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moroni F, Shue-Min Yeh J, Attallah A, Santiago R, Martins Filho E, Hall J, Bangalore S, Azzalini L. Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions. EUROINTERVENTION 2022; 18:71-82. [PMID: 34794934 PMCID: PMC9903157 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-21-00690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary artery bifurcation lesions entails technical challenges and carries a higher risk of adverse events on follow-up, driven by repeat revascularisation and stent thrombosis. While most bifurcations can be tackled with a provisional (single-stent) approach, more complex lesions involving both branches (true bifurcation lesions) require a two-stent approach. In the latter context, several techniques have been proposed. Among them, the crush technique has dramatically evolved in recent years, and its more recent iterations have been shown to provide excellent and durable results, both for left main and non-left main bifurcations. The aim of the present work is to discuss the technical aspects and outcomes of the variants of the crush technique from the first description in the early 2000s to the present day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Moroni
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - James Shue-Min Yeh
- Cardiology Department, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ricardo Santiago
- PCI Cardiology Group, Bayamon Heart and Lung Institute, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, USA,PCI Cardiology Group, Manatí Cardiovascular Interventional Institute, Manatí, Puerto Rico, USA
| | | | - Jack Hall
- Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Sripal Bangalore
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorenzo Azzalini
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, West Hospital, 5th floor, West Wing, Room 526, 1200 East Broad St, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stankovic G, Mehmedbegovic Z, Milasinovic D. Bifurcation Lesion Stenting. Interv Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119697367.ch16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
32
|
Clinical outcomes and OCT analysis after culotte stenting with 2nd and 3rd generation Everolimus-eluting stents: Two-year follow-up of the Celtic bifurcation study. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 43:71-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
33
|
Gao XF, Ge Z, Kan J, Kong XQ, Wang Y, Qiu CG, Tresukosol D, He YQ, Wu Q, Li JF, Yuan HT, Shen C, Chen X, Munawar M, Hanif B, Santoso T, Shin ES, Sheiban I, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Chen SL. Rationale and design for comparison of non-compliant balloon with drug-coating balloon angioplasty for side branch after provisional stenting for patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions: a prospective, multicentre and randomised DCB-BIF trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052788. [PMID: 35277400 PMCID: PMC8919455 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Provisional stenting using drug-eluting stent is effective for simple coronary bifurcation lesions. Kissing balloon inflation using conventional non-compliant balloon is the primary treatment of side branch (SB) after main vessel (MV) stenting. Drug-coating balloon (DCB) is reported to be associated with less frequent clinical events in in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease. The importance of DCB in bifurcation treatment is understudied. Accordingly, this trial is designed to investigate the superiority of DCB to non-compliant balloon angioplasty for SB after provisional stenting in patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The DCB-BIF trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial including 784 patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to receive either DCB or non-compliant balloon angioplasty if SB diameter stenosis >70% after MV stenting. The primary endpoint is the composite of major adverse cardiac event at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. The major secondary endpoints include all-cause death, periprocedural MI, spontaneous MI, clinically driven target vessel revascularisation, in-stent restenosis, stroke and individual component of the primary endpoint. The safety endpoint is the risk of stent thrombosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol and informed consent have been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of all participating centres. The written informed consent for participation in the trial will be obtained from all participants. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04242134.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Fei Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhen Ge
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing Kan
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiang-Quan Kong
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Chun-Guang Qiu
- Cardiology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Damras Tresukosol
- Department of Cardiology, Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yu-Quan He
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Qiang Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ji-Fu Li
- Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Hai-Tao Yuan
- Department of Cardiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Chengxing Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Muhammad Munawar
- Department of Cardiology, Binawaluya Heart Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Bashir Hanif
- Department of Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Teguh Santoso
- Department of Cardiology, Medistra Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Eun-Seok Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan Medical Center, Ulsan, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Imad Sheiban
- Interventional Cardiology, Casa di Cura Dottor Pederzoli SpA, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Fei Ye
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun-Jie Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Elbadawi A, Shnoda M, Dang A, Gad M, Abdelazeem M, Saad M, Salama A, Sharma A, Gilani S, Latib A, Rab T, Elgendy IY, Abbott JD. Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes With Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques. Am J Cardiol 2022; 165:37-45. [PMID: 34937656 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
There have been mixed results regarding the efficacy and safety of various percutaneous coronary intervention bifurcation techniques. An electronic search of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed for randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of any bifurcation techniques. We conducted a pairwise meta-analysis comparing the 1-stent versus 2-stent bifurcation approach, and a network meta-analysis comparing the different bifurcation techniques. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The analysis included 22 randomized trials with 6,359 patients. At a weighted follow-up of 25.9 months, there was no difference in MACE between 1-stent versus 2-stent approaches (risk ratio [RR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 1.56). Exploratory analysis suggested a higher risk of MACE with a 1-stent approach in studies using second-generation drug-eluting stents, if side branch lesion length ≥10 mm, and when final kissing balloon was used. There was no difference between 1-stent versus 2-stent approaches in all-cause mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.30), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.68), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.65), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.56) or stent thrombosis (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.78). Network meta-analysis demonstrated that double kissing crush technique was associated with lower MACE, MI, TVR, and target lesion revascularization, whereas culotte technique was associated with higher rates of stent thrombosis. In this meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found no difference between 1-stent versus 2-stent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention approaches in the risk of MACE during long-term follow-up. Among the various bifurcation techniques, double kissing crush technique was associated with lower rates of MACE, target lesion revascularization, TVR, and MI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Elbadawi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and; Division of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mina Shnoda
- Division of Internal Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Dang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Mohamed Gad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mohamed Abdelazeem
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, Massachusetts
| | - Marwan Saad
- Department of Cardiology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Amr Salama
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York
| | - Alok Sharma
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Azeem Latib
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Tanveer Rab
- Section of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Islam Y Elgendy
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - J Dawn Abbott
- Department of Cardiology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu H, Tao H, Han X, Lu Y, Xue X, Feng R, Lv F, Liu Y, Jin H, Li L, Gu H. Improved Outcomes of Combined Main Branch Stenting and Side Branch Drug-Coated Balloon versus Two-Stent Strategy in Patients with Left Main Bifurcation Lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2022; 2022:8250057. [PMID: 35095348 PMCID: PMC8767379 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8250057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-eluting stent (DES) plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a safe and effective treatment strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions, but there is no report about this strategy being used for left main (LM) bifurcation lesions. We aim to explore the efficacy and safety of DES plus DCB in the treatment of LM bifurcation lesions. METHODS A total of 100 patients diagnosed with LM bifurcation lesions by coronary angiography were retrospectively enrolled at our center from January 2018 to December 2019. They received either a two-stent strategy or a main branch (MB) stenting plus side branch (SB) DCB strategy and were accordingly divided into the 2-DES group and the DES + DCB group. Patients treated with DES + DCB were compared with a cohort of matched patients treated with a 2-DES strategy. Clinical data was collected and quantitative coronary analysis was performed. RESULTS For immediate postoperative angiography, though the two groups had no differences in the minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and luminal stenosis of MB, the DES + DCB group had significantly lower SB ostial MLD and a higher degree of residual lumen stenosis than the 2-DES group (P < 0.05). At the time of follow-up, the SB ostial MLD of the DES + DCB group was higher than that of the 2-DES group, but lumen stenosis, late lumen loss (LLL), and LLL at the distal end of the left MB were all smaller than those of the 2-DES group (Ps < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of lumen restenosis and MACE between the two groups had no significance. CONCLUSION The combination of DES and DCB is relatively safe and effective for the treatment of LM bifurcation lesions, and this strategy seems to have advantages in reducing LLL at the SB ostium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hengdao Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Hailong Tao
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Xufei Han
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Yang Lu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Xiaofei Xue
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Ruihan Feng
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| | - Fenghua Lv
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453100, Henan, China
| | - Yanwei Liu
- Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan 453100, China
| | - Hongrui Jin
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Lianjie Li
- Department of Cardiology, Xichuan Second People's Hospital, Nanyang 474450, Henan, China
| | - Heping Gu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Impact of intravascular ultrasound and final kissing balloon dilatation on long-term clinical outcome in percutaneous revascularization with 1-stent strategy for left main coronary artery stenosis in drug-eluting stent era. Coron Artery Dis 2022; 31:9-17. [PMID: 34569990 DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000001101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains uncertain whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use and final kissing balloon (FKB) dilatation would be standard care of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a simple 1-stent technique in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. This study sought to investigate the impact of IVUS use and FKB dilatation on long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in PCI with a simple 1-stent technique for unprotected LMCA stenosis. METHODS Between June 2006 and December 2012, 255 patients who underwent PCI with 1 drug-eluting stent for LMCA stenosis were analyzed. Mean follow-up duration was 1663 ± 946 days. Long-term MACEs were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularizations. RESULTS During the follow-up, 72 (28.2%) MACEs occurred including 38 (14.9%) deaths, 21 (8.2%) nonfatal MIs and 13 (5.1%) revascularizations. The IVUS examination and FKB dilatation were done in 158 (62.0%) and 119 (46.7%), respectively. IVUS use (20.3 versus 41.2%; log-rank P < 0.001), not FKB dilatation (30.3 versus 26.5%; log-rank P = 0.614), significantly reduced MACEs. In multivariate analysis, IVUS use was a negative predictor of MACEs [hazards ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.88; P = 0.017], whereas FKB dilatation (hazard ratio 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.80; P = 0.047) was a positive predictor of MACEs. In bifurcation LMCA stenosis, IVUS use (18.7 versus 48.0%; log-rank P < 0.001) significantly reduced MACEs. In nonbifurcation LMCA stenosis, FKB dilatation showed a trend of increased MACEs (P = 0.076). CONCLUSION IVUS examination is helpful in reducing clinical events in PCI for LMCA bifurcation lesions, whereas mandatory FKB dilatation after the 1-stent technique might be harmful in nonbifurcation LMCA stenosis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ikuta A, Kubo S, Ohya M, Tada T, Tanaka H, Fuku Y, Kadota K. Impact of late lumen loss on clinical outcomes of side branch bifurcation lesions treated by drug-coated balloon angioplasty with main branch stenting. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2021; 41:92-98. [PMID: 34973930 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for side branches with main branch stenting is effective for bifurcation lesions and reduces late lumen loss (LLL) in side branches. However, the predictors and clinical implications of LLL after DCB angioplasty are largely unexplored. METHODS Among 181 patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for side branches with drug-eluting stent implantation for main branches between 2016 and 2018, we enrolled 138 patients (138 lesions) undergoing follow-up coronary angiography within 1 year. The 1-year cumulative rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TLR) were compared between patients with late lumen gain (LLG) (LLG group) and those with LLL (LLL group). RESULTS The binary restenosis rate of the side branch was 8.0% (11 lesions), mean LLL was -0.14 ± 0.43 mm, and LLG was observed in 99 lesions (71.7%). The DCB size/reference vessel diameter ratio showed mild discrimination (area under the curve, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-65.0; p = 0.03) for predicting the side branch progression. The 1-year cumulative rates of MACE and TLR were not significantly different but numerically lower in the LLG group than in the LLL group (2.0% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.11 and 2.0% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.11, respectively). Lumen regression after DCB angioplasty for side branches are associated with improved clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The DCB size relative to the reference vessel diameter is a predictor of late lumen enlargement in side branches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Ikuta
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
| | - Shunsuke Kubo
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Masanobu Ohya
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tada
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tanaka
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Yasushi Fuku
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Kazushige Kadota
- Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sheiban I, Figini F, Gasparetto V, D’Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Leonardo F. Side Branch is the Main Determinant Factor of Bifurcation Lesion Complexity: Critical Review with a Proposal Based on Single-centre Experience. Heart Int 2021; 15:67-72. [PMID: 36277829 PMCID: PMC9524656 DOI: 10.17925/hi.2021.15.2.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Although bifurcation stenting can be often managed with a simple provisional approach, in some settings, more complex techniques are appropriate. Based on our clinical experience and on data from literature, we propose a simple algorithm that may assist in selecting cases for elective double stenting. We found that, when the side branch is of adequate dimensions and affected by significant disease (longer than 10 mm and/or with presence of ostial calcifications), double stenting is associated with a lower incidence of adverse events, compared with provisional stenting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imad Sheiban
- Ospedale “Pederzoli”, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
- Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang R, Ding Y, Yang J, Wang K, Gao W, Fang Z, Zhou Y, Ge H. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 111:761-775. [PMID: 34862569 PMCID: PMC9242927 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study was aimed to compare different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease (CBD). Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial for CBD; over the years, several stent techniques for bifurcation lesions have been used. Current guidelines recommend a provisional single-stent strategy as the preferred method for coronary artery bifurcation lesions. However, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) indicated that two-stent techniques showed better clinical outcomes. Methods We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to include RCTs. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Secondary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion or target-vessel revascularization (TLR or TVR), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). Finally, we used 26 RCTs and a total of 7257 individuals were randomly assigned to one of the 6 stent techniques and included in this network meta-analysis. Results In our network meta-analysis, double-kissing (DK) crush was significantly more superior to other 5 stent techniques in MACEs: OR vs. provisional 0.40 (95% CI 0.28–0.55); vs. culotte 0.40 (95% CI 0.26–0.60). DK crush ranked the most effective treatment for MACE (100%), MI (75%), ST (83%), and TLR (100%) in the rank probabilities analysis. In patients with complex bifurcation lesion defined by DEFINITION criteria, DK crush was notably more efficacious than provisional, culotte, and T-stenting/T-stenting and protrusion (TAP) in MACEs (OR vs. provisional 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52) and TLR (OR vs. provisional 0.24, 95% CI 0.10–0.58). Conclusion Compared with other stenting techniques, DK crush had a lower incidence of MACEs in CBD. DK crush was significantly associated with a lower rate of MACEs in patients with complex bifurcation lesions defined by the DEFINITION criterion. Graphical abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yaodong Ding
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaxin Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Kexin Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Bayannaoer City Hospital, Inner Mongolia, 015002, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhe Fang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Capital Medical University Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 102699, People's Republic of China
| | - Yujie Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Hailong Ge
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Qin Q, Zheng B, Liu J, Zhang B, Chen M, Li J, Huo Y. Active Versus Conventional Side Branch Protection Strategy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. Int Heart J 2021; 62:1241-1248. [PMID: 34789648 DOI: 10.1536/ihj.21-467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The side branch (SB) provisional stenting strategy is currently the recommended approach for most coronary bifurcation lesions. However, this strategy may result in SB deterioration, which is associated with an increased incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) and may adversely affect the long-term prognosis. Various techniques for SB protection (SB-P) have been developed to reduce SB occlusion and improve the clinical prognosis. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of an active SB-P strategy of jailed balloon technique, balloon-stent kissing technique, and jailed Corsair technique versus the conventional SB-P strategy based on jailed wire technique.This meta-analysis included 5 studies (4 randomized and 1 observational) involving a total of 1,174 patients in whom the active and conventional SB-P strategies were compared. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate summary risk ratios (RRs).The risk of SB occlusion was significantly lower in active SB-P strategy [RR 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.73 in fixed-effect model; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.87 in random-effect model]. The risk of PMI was similar between the two strategies (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.30-1.33 in fixed-effect model; RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.20-2.48 in random-effect model). The rate of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events was similar between the groups (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-1.48 in fixed-effect model; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.16-1.52 in random-effect model).The active SB-P strategy in coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with reduced SB deterioration, but it does not decrease PMI or improve the long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao Qin
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Bo Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Jiahui Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Jianping Li
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| | - Yong Huo
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Peking University First Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Improving PCI Outcomes Using Postprocedural Physiology and Intravascular Imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2415-2430. [PMID: 34794649 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Although clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are improving, the long-term risk for target vessel failure remains concerning. Although the application of intravascular imaging and physiological indexes significantly improves outcomes, their routine use in practice remains limited. Nevertheless, merely using these modalities is not enough, and to truly improve patient outcomes, optimal intravascular dimensions with minimal vascular injury should be targeted. When assessing post-PCI results using either type of physiological or imaging technology, a broad spectrum of stent- and vessel-related anomalies can be expected. As not all of these issues warrant treatment, a profound knowledge of what to expect and how to recognize and when to treat these intraluminal problems is needed. Additionally, promising new modalities such as angiography-derived coronary physiology and hybrid imaging catheters are becoming available. The authors provide an overview of the currently available tools and techniques to define suboptimal PCI and when to apply these technologies to improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
42
|
Raphael CE, O'Kane PD, Johnson TW, Prasad A, Gulati R, Sandoval Y, Di Mario C, Holmes DR. Evolution of the Crush Technique for Bifurcation Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2315-2326. [PMID: 34736729 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Bifurcation lesions are frequently encountered, associated with greater procedural complexity and consequently are at higher risk for restenosis and stent thrombosis. Early trials in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention favored a provisional stenting approach, but contemporary randomized trials have highlighted potentially superior outcomes using a double-kiss crush technique in unprotected distal left main stem bifurcation lesions. Although the evidence is greatest for double-kiss crush, many operators favor a mini-crush or nano-crush single-kiss approach. In this review, the authors describe the iterations of the crush technique and the evidence for each and review general principles for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E Raphael
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter D O'Kane
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas W Johnson
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Abhiram Prasad
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rajiv Gulati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yader Sandoval
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Carlo Di Mario
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - David R Holmes
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
A J, Malviya A, Thomas J, S V, Mandalay A, Joseph J, Mathew R. Rationale, Design, and Implications of Bifurcation Coronary Stenting: Insight from the Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) Registry. Cureus 2021; 13:e18027. [PMID: 34671518 PMCID: PMC8520440 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bifurcation coronary stenting (BCS) has unique therapeutic challenges. Several BCS strategies are prescribed for treatment, with conflicting data, and which is the best strategy for optimal short- and long-term outcomes remains a matter of debate. There is no systematic data from an Indian perspective in regard to patterns of BCS and its outcomes. Methods and analysis The Indian Bifurcation Stenting (IBIS) registry is a prospective, nationwide, endpoint-driven, investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational registry to compare the different bifurcation stent strategies, the effect of adjuvant techniques, and bifurcation anatomical differences in predicting short- and long-term clinical outcomes of bifurcation coronary interventions in India. A total of 1,000 patients from 20 clinical sites across the country will be enrolled in this study from September 2020 to August 2023. The primary endpoint will be the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at the end of two years. The secondary endpoints include all causes of death, MI, target vessel revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stroke, and predefined procedural parameters. The safety endpoint is the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. Conclusion The aim of this prospective observational registry is to assess the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation lesion angioplasty in India. This will be extremely useful to provide an evidence-based insight as well as guidance to bifurcation angioplasty in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jabir A
- Cardiology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, IND
| | - Amit Malviya
- Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health And Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND
| | | | - Vijaykumar S
- Cardiology, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, IND
| | | | - Jo Joseph
- Cardiology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, IND
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lee JM, Lee SH, Kim J, Choi KH, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi JH, Choi SH, Kim HS, Chun WJ, Nam CW, Hur SH, Han SH, Rha SW, Chae IH, Jeong JO, Heo JH, Yoon J, Lim DS, Park JS, Hong MK, Doh JH, Cha KS, Kim DI, Lee SY, Chang K, Hwang BH, Choi SY, Jeong MH, Hong SJ, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Ten-Year Trends in Coronary Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prognostic Effects of Patient and Lesion Characteristics, Devices, and Techniques. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e021632. [PMID: 34514841 PMCID: PMC8649555 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.021632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite advances in devices and techniques, coronary bifurcation lesion remains a challenging lesion subset in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluate 10‐year trends in bifurcation PCI and their effects on patient outcomes. Methods and Results We analyzed 10‐year trends in patient/lesion characteristics, devices, PCI strategy, stent optimization techniques, and clinical outcomes using data from 5498 patients who underwent bifurcation PCI from 2004 to 2015. Clinical outcomes 2 years after the index procedure were evaluated in terms of target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and a patient‐oriented composite outcome (a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization). During the 10‐year study period, patient and lesion complexity, such as multivessel disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and left main bifurcation, increased continuously (all P<0.001). The risk of target vessel failure or patient‐oriented composite outcome decreased continuously from 2004 to 2015 (target vessel failure: from 12.3% to 6.9%, log‐rank P<0.001; patient‐oriented composite outcome: from 13.6% to 9.3%, log‐rank P<0.001). The use of a second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and decreased target vessel failure risk in true bifurcation lesions were the major contributors to improved patient prognosis (interaction P values were <0.001 and 0.013, respectively). Conclusions During the past decade of bifurcation PCI, patient and lesion characteristics, devices, PCI techniques, and patient prognosis have all significantly changed. Despite increased patient and lesion complexity, clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI have improved, mainly because of better devices and more widespread adoption of procedural optimization techniques and appropriate treatment strategies. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01642992 and NCT03068494.
Collapse
|
45
|
Watanabe Y, Mitomo S, Naganuma T, Takagi K, Obata H, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Nakamura S, Colombo A. Clinical impact of bifurcation angle change between diastole and systole in complex stenting for left main distal bifurcation: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 98:E24-E34. [PMID: 33373092 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the impact of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bifurcation angle change (BAC) on clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND There are little available data about the impact of BAC in unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) PCI. METHODS We identified consecutive 300 patients with ULMD underwent complex stenting using drug-eluting stent in three high-volume centers (Tokyo and Milan). We measured the widest BA of ULMD at both end-diastole and end-systole before stenting with two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment and calculated the BAC value as a difference of two BA value in each lesion. We divided them into small and large BAC group according to the median BAC value (7.2°). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction. RESULTS TLF rate at 3-year was significantly higher in the large BAC group than in the small BAC group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.40-10.1; p < .001). TLR rate for left main (LM) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) and ostial left circumflex artery (LCXos) at 3-year were significantly higher in large BAC group than in small BAC group (adjusted HR 5.91; 95% CI, 2.03-17.2; p = .001 and adjusted HR 10.6; 95% CI, 5.20-21.6; p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS A large BAC before stenting is strongly associated with adverse events after complex stenting for ULMD, mainly driven by repeat PCI for restenosis of the LCXos and of the LM-LAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Watanabe
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan.,Department of Interventional Cardiology, Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Satoru Mitomo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
| | - Toru Naganuma
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kensuke Takagi
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Obata
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Montorfano
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sunao Nakamura
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM, Cotignola, Italy.,Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Patel NJ, Okamoto N, Murphy J, Vengrenyuk Y, Sharma SK, Kini AS. Management of calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97:1407-1416. [PMID: 32776696 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions (CBL) remain a challenge for the interventional cardiologist. Evidence regarding treatment of CBL is minimal. Optimal plaque modification is the most important step prior to stent deployment. Provisional stenting is the preferred strategy for most bifurcation lesions. However, two-stent strategy should be considered for BL with compromised large SB (>2.5 mm) supplying a large territory, >70% SB stenosis and lesions more than 5 mm long. In this contemporary review article, we present a simplified approach to treating CBL and demonstrate the approach to specific case examples using our newly developed mobile application, BifurcAID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nileshkumar J Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Naotaka Okamoto
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Jonathan Murphy
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Yuliya Vengrenyuk
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Samin K Sharma
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Annapoorna S Kini
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JM, Park TK, Yang JH, Hahn JY, Choi JH, Choi SH, Kim HS, Chun WJ, Hur SH, Han SH, Rha SW, Chae IH, Jeong JO, Heo JH, Yoon J, Lim DS, Park JS, Hong MK, Doh JH, Cha KS, Kim DI, Lee SY, Chang K, Hwang BH, Choi SY, Jeong MH, Hong SJ, Nam CW, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Differential Long-Term Effects of First- and Second-Generation DES in Patients With Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing PCI. JACC. ASIA 2021; 1:68-79. [PMID: 36338362 PMCID: PMC9627880 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data regarding the long-term clinical outcomes of first- versus second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), especially when used to treat complex lesions such as bifurcation lesions. OBJECTIVES The current study compares the efficacy and safety of first- versus second-generation DES at the 5-year follow-up in patients who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS A total of 5,498 patients with a bifurcation lesion who underwent PCI were pooled at a single patient level from COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) registries II and III. Five-year target lesion failure (TLF) (the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and cardiac death or MI were compared between the use of first-generation DES (n = 2,436) and second-generation DES (n = 3,062) during PCI. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. RESULTS After a 1:1 propensity score matching procedure was conducted, the cohort consisted of 1,702 matched pairs. Patients treated with second-generation DES had a significantly lower risk of TLF at 5 years than those treated with first-generation DES in both overall and propensity-matched populations (matched hazard ratio [HRmatched]: 0.576; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.456 to 0.727; p <0.001). There were no significant differences in risk of a composite of cardiac death or MI between the 2 groups (HRmatched: 0.782; 95% CI: 0.539 to 1.133, P = 0.193). However, among patients who required a 2-stent technique, use of the second-generation DES reduced cardiac death or MI (HRmatched:0.422; 95% CI: 0.209 to 0.851, P = 0.016). On the other hand, among patients who required a one-stent technique, the risk of a composite of cardiac death or MI was similar between the 2 groups (HRmatched: 1.046; 95% CI: 0.664 to 1.650, P = 0.845). There was a significant interaction between stent generation and treatment strategy for cardiac death or MI (interaction P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS In patients treated with PCI for a bifurcation lesion, the use of second-generation DES was associated with a significantly reduced risk of 5-year TLF than the use of first-generation DES. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry II [NCT01642992]; COBIS II) (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III [NCT03068494] COBIS III).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Hong Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Bin Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taek Kyu Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Yong Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ho Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Jung Chun
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Ho Hur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Han
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Woon Rha
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Chae
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ho Heo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Junghan Yoon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Do-Sun Lim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Seon Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong-Ki Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon-Hyung Doh
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Soo Cha
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo-Il Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Yeub Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Kiyuk Chang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Hee Hwang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Yeon Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Ho Jeong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Soon-Jun Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu K, Kan J, Tao L, Santoso T, Munawar M, Tresukosol D, Li L, Sheiban I, Li F, Tian NL, Rodríguez AE, Paiboon C, Lavarra F, Lu S, Vichairuangthum K, Zeng H, Chen L, Zhang R, Ding S, Gao F, Jin Z, Hong L, Ma L, Wen S, Wu X, Yang S, Yin WH, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Zhou L, Zhou L, Zhu Y, Xu T, Wang X, Qu H, Tian Y, Lin S, Liu L, Lu Q, Li Q, Li B, Jiang Q, Han L, Gan G, Yu M, Pan D, Shang Z, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Yuan Y, Chen C, Stone GW, Han Y, Chen SL. Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial. Eur Heart J 2021; 41:2523-2536. [PMID: 32588060 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The present study aimed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques for patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 653 patients with complex bifurcation lesions at 49 international centres were randomly assigned to undergo the systematic two-stent technique (two-stent group) or provisional stenting (provisional group). The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF) at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The safety endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis. At the 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 37 (11.4%) and 20 (6.1%) patients in the provisional and two-stent groups, respectively [77.8%: double-kissing crush; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.90; P = 0.019], largely driven by increased TVMI (7.1%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90; P = 0.025) and clinically driven TLR (5.5%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-1.00; P = 0.049) in the provisional group. At the 1 year after indexed procedures, the incidence of cardiac death was 2.5% in the provisional group, non-significant to 2.1% in the two-stent group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.37; P = 0.772). CONCLUSION For DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions, the systematic two-stent approach was associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the provisional stenting approach. Further study is urgently warranted to identify the mechanisms contributing to the increased rate of TVMI after provisional stenting. STUDY REGISTRATION http://www.clinicaltrials.com; Identifier: NCT02284750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Jie Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, China
| | - Fei Ye
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, China
| | - Kai Xu
- Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Jing Kan
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, China
| | - Ling Tao
- Division of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, 4th Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Teguh Santoso
- Division of Cardiology, Medistra Hospital, University of Indonesia Medical School, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Munawar
- Division of Cardiology, Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Damras Tresukosol
- Division of Cardiology, Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Li Li
- Division of Cardiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Imad Sheiban
- Division of Cardiology, Pederzoli Hospital-Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Feng Li
- Division of Cardiology, Oriental General Hospital, Huainan, China
| | - Nai-Liang Tian
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing Heart Center, Nanjing, China
| | | | | | - Francesco Lavarra
- Division of Cardiology, Jilin Cardiovascular Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Shu Lu
- Division of Cardiology, Taicang 1st People's Hospital, Taicang, China
| | | | - Hesong Zeng
- Division of Cardiology, Wuhan Tongji Hospital, United Medical University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lianglong Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Institute of Coronary Artery Disease, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ruiyan Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Communication University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiqin Ding
- Division of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, Huainan, China
| | - Fengtang Gao
- Division of Cardiology, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zening Jin
- Division of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lang Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, China
| | - Likun Ma
- Division of Cardiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Shangyu Wen
- Division of Cardiology, Tianjin 4th Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xueming Wu
- Division of Cardiology, Wuxi 3rd People's Hospital, Wuxi, China
| | - Song Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Wei-Hsian Yin
- Division of Cardiology, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yonghong Zheng
- Division of Cardiology, Jintan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jintan, China
| | - Lei Zhou
- Division of Cardiology, Liyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liyang, China
| | - Limin Zhou
- Division of Cardiology, Chuzhou People's Hospital, Chuzhou, China
| | - Yuansheng Zhu
- Division of Cardiology, Huaian 2nd People's Hospital, Huaian, China
| | - Tan Xu
- Division of Cardiology, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Lianyungang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Lianyungang, China
| | - Hong Qu
- Division of Cardiology, XuanCheng Central Hospital, Xuancheng, China
| | - Yulong Tian
- Division of Cardiology, Xuyi People's Hospital, Xuyi, China
| | - Song Lin
- Division of Cardiology, Jintan People's Hospital, Jintan, China
| | - Lijun Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Huainan People's Hospital, Huainan, China
| | - Qinghua Lu
- Division of Cardiology, 2nd People's Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Qihua Li
- Division of Cardiology, Changzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, China
| | - Bo Li
- Division of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| | - Qing Jiang
- Division of Cardiology, Anqing 1st People's Hospital, Anqing, China
| | - Leng Han
- Division of Cardiology, Changshu People's Hospital, Changshu, China
| | - Guojun Gan
- Division of Cardiology, 17th Metallurgical Hospital, Maanshan, China
| | - Mengyue Yu
- Division of Cardiology, Qingdao Campus of Fuwai Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Defeng Pan
- Division of Cardiology, Xuzhou 2nd People's Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zhenglu Shang
- Division of Cardiology, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, China
| | - Yanfang Zhao
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing 81 Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhizhong Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Hongze People's Hospital, Huai'an, China
| | - Ye Yuan
- Trinity College, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Chen
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregg W Stone
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Ican School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA and The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yaling Han
- Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, China.,College of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lee CH, Ahn JM, Kang DY, Han M, Park H, Lee PH, Lee SW, Park SW, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of simple versus complex stenting in patients with true distal left main bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97:776-785. [PMID: 32898318 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Distal left main (LM) bifurcation disease is one of the most challenging lesion subsets for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal stenting strategy for such complex lesions is still debated. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following single versus dual stenting for true distal LM bifurcation lesions. METHODS Patients with true distal LM bifurcation lesions (type 1,1,1 or 0,1,1: both left anterior descending and circumflex artery >2.5 mm diameter) receiving PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) from two large clinical registries were evaluated. The primary outcome was target-lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Outcomes were compared with the use of propensity scores and inverse probability-weighting adjustment to reduce treatment selection bias. RESULTS Among 1,002 patients undergoing true distal LM PCI, 440 (43.9%) and 562 (56.1%) were treated with single and dual stents, respectively. The TLF rates at 3 year was 20.3% in the single-stent group and 24.1% in the dual-stenting group (log-rank p = 0.18). The adjusted risk for TLF did not differ significantly between two groups (hazard ratio [HR] with dual-stent vs. single-stent: 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.71). The adjusted risks for death, MI, repeat revascularization, or stent thrombosis were also similar between the single- and dual-stenting groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI for true distal LM disease, single- and dual-stent strategies showed a similar adjusted risk of TLF at 3 years. Our findings should be confirmed or refuted through large, randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheol Hyun Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jung-Min Ahn
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Do-Yoon Kang
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Minkyu Han
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Medical Research and Information, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hanbit Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Pil Hyung Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Whan Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong-Wook Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Duk-Woo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ge Z, Kan J, Gao XF, Kong XQ, Zuo GF, Ye F, Tian NL, Lin S, Liu ZZ, Sun ZQ, He PC, Wei L, Yang W, He YQ, Xue YZ, Wang LM, Miao LF, Pu J, Sun YW, Nie SP, Tao JH, Wen SY, Yang Q, Su X, Yao QC, Huang YJ, Xia Y, Shen FR, Qiu CG, Mao YL, Liu Q, Hu XQ, Du ZM, Nie RQ, Han YL, Zhang JJ, Chen SL. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound-guided with angiography-guided double kissing crush stenting for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, and multicenter DKCRUSH VIII trial. Am Heart J 2021; 234:101-110. [PMID: 33465369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Double kissing (DK) crush approach for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, particularly localized at distal left main or lesions with increased complexity, is associated with significant reduction in clinical events when compared with provisional stenting. Recently, randomized clinical trial has demonstrated the net clinical benefits by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided implantation of drug-eluting stent in all-comers. However, the improvement in clinical outcome after DK crush treatment guided by IVUS over angiography guidance for patients with complex bifurcation lesions have never been studied in a randomized fashion. TRIAL DESIGN DKCRUSH VIII study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess superiority of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex bifurcation lesions according to DEFINITION criteria. A total of 556 patients with complex bifurcation lesions will be randomly (1:1 of ratio) assigned to IVUS-guided or angiography-guided DK crush stenting group. The primary end point is the rate of 12-month target vessel failure, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. The secondary end points consist of the individual component of primary end point, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and in-stent restenosis. The safety end point is the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. An angiographic follow-up will be performed for all patients at 13 months and clinical follow-up will be continued annually until 3 years after the index procedure. CONCLUSIONS DKCRUSH VIII trial is the first study designed to evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex true bifurcation lesions. This study will also provide IVUS-derived criteria to define optimal DK crush stenting for bifurcation lesions at higher complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Ge
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Kan
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiao-Fei Gao
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang-Quan Kong
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guang-Feng Zuo
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Fei Ye
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Nai-Liang Tian
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Song Lin
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhi-Qi Sun
- Division of Cardiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, China
| | - Peng-Cheng He
- Division of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Wei
- Division of Cardiology, Harbin First Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Division of Cardiology, The 4th Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yu-Quan He
- Division of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Yu-Zeng Xue
- Division of Cardiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Lian-Min Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Mudanjiang Cardiovascular Hospital, Mudanjiang, China
| | - Li-Fu Miao
- Division of Cardiology, Beijing Huaxin Hospital, the First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Pu
- Division of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ya-Wu Sun
- Division of Cardiology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shao-Ping Nie
- Division of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Hong Tao
- Division of Cardiology, Sichuan Province People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Shang-Yu Wen
- Division of Cardiology, Tianjin 4th People's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xi Su
- Division of Cardiology, Wuhan Asia heart Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Qi-Cheng Yao
- Division of Cardiology, Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yi-Jie Huang
- Division of Cardiology, XuZhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yong Xia
- Division of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Fa-Rong Shen
- Division of Cardiology, Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chun-Guang Qiu
- Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - You-Lin Mao
- Division of Cardiology, The 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Division of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xin-Qun Hu
- Division of Cardiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi-Min Du
- Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ru-Qiong Nie
- Division of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya-Ling Han
- Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Jun-Jie Zhang
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shao-Liang Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|