Prospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2019; 10(6): 362-375
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362
Prospective study of total and various types of vegetables and the risk of metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents
Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi, Bahar Bakhshi, Ekbal Betru, Mina Darand, Nutrition and Endocrine Research center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 19395-4763, Iran
Parvin Mirmiran, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 19395-4763, Iran
Fereidoun Azizi, Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 19395-4763, Iran
ORCID number: Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi (0000-0002-0210-6787); Bahar Bakhshi (0000-0003-3748-1429); Ekbal Betru (0000-0002-9059-1152); Parvin Mirmiran (0000-0003-2391-4924); Mina Darand (0000-0002-4830-472X); Fereidoun Azizi (0000-0003-3134-1441).
Author contributions: Mirmiran P and Hosseinpour-Niazi S designed the study; Hosseinpour-Niazi S, Bakhshi B, and Betru E performed the research; Hosseinpour-Niazi S and Darand M analyzed the data; Hosseinpour-Niazi S wrote the paper; Mirmiran P and Aziz F revised the manuscript for final submission.
Supported by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, No. 12508.
Institutional review board statement: Study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (RIES), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was acquired from participants prior to their inclusion in the study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Parvin Mirmiran, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, A’rabi St, Yeman Av, Velenjak, Tehran 19395-4763, Iran. mirmiran@endocrine.ac.ir
Telephone: +98-21-22357484 Fax: +98-21-22416264
Received: March 12, 2019
Peer-review started: March 15, 2019
First decision: April 13, 2019
Revised: May 9, 2019
Accepted: May 14, 2019
Article in press: May 14, 2019
Published online: June 15, 2019

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Data available on the association between consumption of various types of vegetables and metabolic syndrome (MetS) remain inconsistent.

AIM

To investigate the association between the intake of various types of vegetables and MetS among children and adolescents and MetS.

METHODS

The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study cohort included 424 children and adolescents initially free of MetS. At the 3.6 year follow-up, 47 new cases of MetS were identified. A 168-item semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire was used to collect information about total and various types of vegetables consumed, including allium-, green leafy-, fruity-, root-, stalk-, starchy-, potatoes, and cabbage. MetS was defined according to the Cook et al[32] criteria.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) of total vegetable consumption was 217 (146-344) g/d. After adjustment for demographic characteristics and dietary intake, higher total- (≥ 350 g/d) and higher allium vegetable consumption (≥ 30 g/d) in the fourth quartile were significantly and inversely associated with risk of MetS compared to the first quartile. Consumption of green leafy vegetables in the third (21.4-38.3 g/d) versus the first quartile (≤ 13.5 g/d) demonstrated a significant inverse association with lower risk of MetS in children and adolescents; associations for other types of vegetables consumed were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Consumption of vegetables, especially allium and green leafy vegetables, in sufficient amounts may be beneficial in reducing the risk of MetS among children and adolescents.

Key Words: Metabolic syndrome, Children and adolescents, Vegetable, Allium, Green leafy vegetables

Core tip: Data on the association between vegetable intake as an individual dietary component and metabolic syndrome (MetS) remain inconsistent. This inconsistency of findings may probably be due to a difference in the amounts and specific subgroups of vegetables in different studies. This prospective study of Iranian children and adolescents reported an inverse association between total vegetable consumption and MetS risk. Among vegetable subgroups, consumption of green leafy- and allium vegetables was inversely associated with risk of MetS after adjustment for the main potential confounders.



INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by the clustering of metabolic abnor-malities such as glucose intolerance, central obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Although there is no concurrence on a MetS definition for children and adolescents, the prevalence of MetS in obese children is documented to be approximately 30%[1]. Since MetS components show stability from childhood to adulthood, children fulfilling diagnostic criteria for MetS may remain at high risk as they enter adulthood[2]. MetS severity in childhood has been linked to future risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD)[3], indicating that implementing interventions for a healthy lifestyle early in childhood might be preventive against future development of MetS and its complications.

The primary goal for MetS management is to alleviate all metabolic risk factors through effective lifestyle changes[4]. Research indicates healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean and Dietary approach to stop hypertension diets, all of which recommend high intakes of vegetables, improve MetS and type 2 diabetes[5,6]; however, data on the associations between vegetable intakes as an individual dietary component and MetS, type 2 diabetes, and CVD remain inconsistent[7-13]. Although one meta-analysis, including 26 observational studies, reported beneficial effects for consumption of vegetables on MetS[7], another meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found no effect on MetS components[8]. Protective effects of vegetable consumption against other nutrition-related chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, are also still not clear; some report an inverse association[9], while others document none[10,11]. Some others report a threshold of around two-three servings/day of vegetables, after which diabetes risk did not reduce further[12,13]. This inconsistency of findings might probably be due to differences in the amounts and specific subgroups of vegetables in different studies. Biological effects of vegetables may vary due to their phytochemical profiles: Leafy vegetables as a source of nitrogen containing compounds, nitrate, and carotenoids, lutein, polyphenols, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and lignans[14]; Cabbage as a source of polyphenols, flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans; Allium vegetables as source of organosulfur compound, allyl cysteine, alliin, allicin, and allyl disulfide, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds[15]; and fruity vegetables as a source of carotenoids, lycopene and pro-vitamin A, beta-carotene[7]. In addition, consuming a variety of vegetables, such as green leafy-, allium-, and cruciferous vegetables, has been inconsistently associated with CVD risk[16-21] and type 2 diabetes[9,11,22,23].

As mentioned, subgroups of vegetables may differ in nutritional content, energy, fiber, and phytochemicals[24]. Considering the limited data available on the association of different types of vegetables with MetS, the aim of our study was to investigate the association between intake of various types of vegetables and MetS after 3.6 years of follow-up in Tehranian children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects and methods

This prospective population-based study was conducted within the framework of the Tehran lipid and glucose study (TLGS), an ongoing, prospective community based study, aimed at preventing non-communicable disease and reducing its risk factors through promoting healthy lifestyles. Detailed characteristics of the TLGS have been described elsewhere[25]. Briefly, phase I of the TLGS was initiated in March 1999. A multistage cluster sampling was used to randomly select > 15000 individuals, aged ≥ 3 years from residents of Tehran’s urban district 13, a group representing the urban population of Tehran. Follow-up data are collected every 3 years to update partici-pants, data on demographics, lifestyle, biochemical, clinical, and dietary assessments. Phases II, III, and IV are prospective follow-up studies conducted between 2002-2005, 2006-2008, and 2009-2011, respectively. The current prospective population-based study was conducted during a mean 3.6 years of follow-up (follow-up rate: 86%); baseline data were obtained from phase III of TLGS (2006–2008), and outcome examination data were from phase IV (2009-2011).

For the current study, of 12 523 individuals who entered survey III of TLGS, based on age and gender, 4920 subjects were randomly selected for collection of nutritional data. This sample size was chosen owing to the cost, complexity, and time involved in collection of dietary data in a large population. Characteristics of participants who had complete dietary data were similar to those of the total population in phase III of the TLGS[26]. Of the 4920 participants enrolled in the present study, 621 children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years, agreed to complete the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Those who had missing data on dietary intakes or MetS components (n = 29), those who had baseline MetS (n = 69), and participants who over- or under-reported (n = 122) were all excluded. According to the equation proposed by the institute of medicine[27], by dividing the reported energy intake by the estimated energy requirement (EER), individuals who were not within the ± 3 SD range (those in the top and bottom 1% of the energy intake to EER ratio), were defined as under and over-reporters. Finally data of 424 participants was used for analysis (response rate 68% during the 3.6 years follow-up). Anthropometric and biochemical measurements of participants who provided follow-up assessments was similar to those lost to follow-up.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, and written informed consent was acquired from participants prior to their inclusion in the study.

Dietary assessment

Dietary intake information over the previous year was assessed using a 168-item, validated, semi-quantitative FFQ[28]. Consumption frequency of each food item was documented on a daily, weekly, monthly basis, by a trained dietitian, during face to face interviews; portion sizes were reported in household measures and converted to gram using household measures[29]. Percentages of carbohydrate, fat, and protein intake were calculated by multiplying the grams of consumption of each food by the content of carbohydrate, protein, and fat. The composition values were obtained from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Composition Table (FCT), as the Iranian FCT is incomplete (limited to only raw materials and a few nutrients). Vegetable consumption was assessed using 28 vegetables and reported as grams per day. General classification of our subgroups of vegetables (green leafy-, allium-, stalk-, fruity, root-, starchy-, cabbage, and potatoes) was based on Cooper et al[9] and the classification used in the EPIC-InterAct study.

Reliability and validity of the FFQ for total vegetable consumption was acceptable (adjusted correlation coefficient between FFQ and multiple 24 recalls was 0.69 and 0.50, respectively; between the two FFQs it was 0.46 and 0.50 in males and females, respectively)[28]. Also, dietary patterns derived from the FFQ have shown reasonable reliability, validity, and stability over time[30].

Biochemical measurement

Blood samples were drawn after 12-14 h of overnight fasting, between 7:00-9:00 a.m. from all participants, at baseline and follow-up. All blood analyses were done at the TLGS research laboratory on the day of sample collection. The enzymatic colorimetric method using glucose oxidase was used to measure fasting plasma glucose (FPG). High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured after precipitation of the apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic acid. Using the enzymatic colorimetric method with glycerol phosphate oxidase, triglycerides (TG) concentrations were measured. All analyses were performed using commercial kits (Pars Azmoon Inc., Tehran, Iran). Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variations at baseline were both 2.2% for FPG, 2% and 0.5% for HDL-C, and 1.6% and 0.6% for TG, respectively.

Assessment of other variables

Blood pressure was measured manually twice using a standard mercury sphygmo-manometer after a 15 min rest in supine position, and the mean of two measurements was considered as the participants’ blood pressure. Height was measured without shoes using a stadiometer, while participants were standing with shoulders in normal alignment, and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. Weight was measured without shoes, with participants wearing light clothes, using a digital scale, and recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg (Seca 707; Seca Corporation, Hanover, MD, United States; range 0.1-150 kg). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the iliac crest and lowest rib, recorded to 0.1 cm, in a standing position using an unstretched elastic tape. Physical activity level was calculated to metabolic equivalent task minutes per week, using the modifiable activity questionnaire, the high reliability (97%) and moderate validity (49%) of which have been verified previously for the Persian translated modifiable activity questionnaire in adolescents[31]. Levels of physical activity were expressed as metabolic equivalent hours per week. Smoking history was collected using a questionnaire and categorized as smokers (smoked > 1 cigarette per day) and non-smoker/ex-smoker. Medical history and data on current use of medications, family history of diabetes, age, and gender were obtained using a questionnaire, as reported previously[25].

Definition of MetS

Since there is no consensus regarding the criteria and definition of MetS for children and adolescents, the Cook et al[32] proposed definition, which defines MetS as ≥ 3 of the following criteria, was used: (1) TG ≥ 110 mg/dL or; (2) HDL-C < 40 mg/dL; (3) FPG ≥ 100 mg/dL, according to the recent recommendations of the American Diabetes Association[33]; (4) Systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90th percentile for sex, age, and height, from the cut off points recommended by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute[34]; and (5) WC ≥ 90th percentile for age and sex, according to national reference curves[35]. Pre-MetS has been defined as having two components of these criteria[36].

For individuals aged > 18 years after follow-up, MetS was defined as the presence of three or more of five components, as recommended by the Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation as follows: (1) Low serum HDL cholesterol (< 40 mg/dL in men and < 50 mg/dL in women; (2) Abnormal glucose homeostasis (FPG ≥ 100 mg/dL or use of hyperglycemic medication); (3) Elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication); (4) High serum triglyceride concentration (≥ 150 mg/dL or use of antihypertriglyceridemia medication); and (5) Enlarged WC (≥ 95 cm according to the newly introduced cut-off points for Iranian adults for both gen-ders)[37,38].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (v. 15.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States), with statistical significance set at as P < 0.05. Consump-tion of total- and various types of vegetables was categorized into quartiles according to their baseline intakes. One-way analysis of variance and chi-squared test were used to report baseline characteristics and dietary intakes (adjusted for energy intakes) in total vegetable categories; data are presented as means ± standard error and median [interquartile range (IQR)] for continuous variables, and percentages for categorical variables. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident MetS were estimated across quartiles of total- and different types of vegetable consumption using the logistic regression model, with the first quartile being used as a reference. Model 1 was crude. Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, physical activity, family history of diabetes, total energy-, and cholesterol intake at baseline. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for BMI at baseline. Tests for trend of ORs across quartiles of total and various types of vegetables were conducted by assigning the median value to each quintile as a continuous variable in the regression models. By multivariable regression models, we further performed stratified analysis by categories of number of components of MetS (0, 1, or 2 components of Mets) at baseline to estimate ORs of MetS based intake of total and various types of vegetable consumption (above/below the medians).

RESULTS

Among 424 children and adolescents free of MetS at baseline, 47 (11%) were diagnosed with MetS during a median follow-up period of 3.6 years. Participants (58% girls) were aged 13.5 (SD 3.7) years at baseline with BMI 20.0 (SD 3.8) kg/m2. Median ± IQR of total vegetables consumption was 217 (146-344) g/d. At baseline, the median (IQR) from highest to lowest range of various types of vegetable consumption was: Fruity vegetables 115 (69.5-211.0), leafy vegetables 21.4 (13.4-38.4), allium vegetables 17.6 (6.3-30.5), potatoes 10.3 (4.8-20.7), root vegetables 9.9 (4.2-22.3), other starchy vegetables 5.8 (3.3-12.6), cabbage 3.1 (0.0-6.2), and stalk vegetables 0.45 (0.0-1.1).

Table 1 presents the characteristics of participants according to quartiles of total vegetable consumption. Participants in the highest quartile had low systolic blood pressure, low fasting blood glucose, and high HDL cholesterol concentrations at baseline. After 3.6 years of follow-up, FBS was significantly lower and HDL cholesterol significantly higher among those in the highest quartile of total vegetable consumption, compared with those in the lowest. No statistically significant associations were found for age, gender, physical activity levels, family history of diabetes, parental education level and occupational status, and BMI. The prevalence of subjects with 0, 1, and 2 components of MetS did not differ across quartiles of vegetable consumption. There was no significant difference in total vegetable consumption [median (IQR)] between participants with 0 [206 (145-322 g/d)], 1 [217 (144-351 g/d)], and 2 components of MetS [226 (161-345 g/d)] at baseline.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants by quartiles of total vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Quartiles of total vegetable consumption
P1 value
1234
Participants, n106106106106
Number of components of MetS at baseline, n
No component424545490.91
1 component40414047
2 components, pre-MetS24202110
Metabolic syndrome after 3.6 yr, n1712108
Age, yr13.1 ± 0.313.3 ± 0.313.7 ± 0.313.9 ± 0.30.31
Female, %53.865.154.756.60.32
Low physical activity, %617369520.74
Family history of diabetes, %4.78.53.83.80.37
BMI, kg/m219.6 ± 0.420.7 ± 0.320.0 ± 0.319.8 ± 0.30.18
Parental academic degrees, %25.226.922.825.20.48
Parental occupational status, employed, %83.687.481.782.20.39
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg
At baseline99.1 ± 1.198.1 ± 1.196.2 ± 1.195.0 ± 1.10.04
After 3.6 yr101 ± 1.2100.2 ± 2101.2 ± 1.298.8 ± 1.20.44
Diastolic Blood pressure, mmHg
At baseline65.1 ± 0.965.0 ± 0.963.9 ± 0.964.3 ± 0.90.76
After 3.6 yr66.5 ± 0.968.4 ± 0.968.2 ± 0.969.0 ± 0.90.27
Fasting blood glucose, mg/dL
At baseline86.6 ± 0.684.3 ± 0.685.1 ± 0.684.2 ± 0.60.036
After 3.6 yr91.8 ± 0.789.8 ± 0.789.3 ± 0.788.9 ± 0.70.037
Serum triglycerides, mg/dL
At baseline78.0 (60.0 – 95.0)83.0 (63.0 – 100.0)83.0 (64.0 - 103.0)78.5 (64.0 - 105.0)0.64
After 3.6 yr79.0 (60.7 – 109.0)73.0 (60.0 – 101.0)74.0 (60.0 – 96.0)77.0 (62.5 - 98.5)0.58
Serum HDL-C, mg/dL
At baseline45.2± 1.144.8 ± 1.144.8 ± 1.148.5 ± 1.10.030
After 3.6 yr50.5 ± 1.250.0 ± 1.251.3 ± 1.255.1 ± 1.20.014
Waist circumference, cm
At baseline67.3 ± 1.068.2 ± 1.069.5 ± 1.070.3 ± 1.00.16
After 3.6 yr76.1 ± 1.077.0 ± 1.077.9 ± 1.077.6 ± 1.00.62

Table 2 presents energy adjusted means for dietary components across quartiles of total vegetable consumption. Participants who consumed more vegetables, also consumed more of types of vegetables. Consequently, those with a high intake of vegetables consumed more total fiber, cholesterol, magnesium, potassium, fruit, nuts, and dairy products.

Table 2 Baseline dietary intakes of participants by quartiles of total vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Quartiles of total vegetable consumption
P value
1234
Fruity vegetables, g/d57.5 ± 9.299.2 ± 9.2156 ± 9.2293 ± 9.2< 0.001
Root vegetables, g/d7.9 ± 1.914.8 ± 1.918.7 ± 1.927.3 ± 1.9< 0.001
Stalk vegetables, g/d0.7 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.20.002
Leafy vegetables, g/d19.1 ± 2.324.2 ± 2.330.8 ± 2.244.3 ± 2.4< 0.001
Potatoes, g/d9.7 ± 2.813.6 ± 2.717.7 ± 2.728.8 ± 2.9< 0.001
Starchy vegetables, g/d7.6 ± 1.38.2 ± 1.213.4 ± 1.211.3 ± 1.30.003
Cabbage, g/d2.4 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.48.6 ± 1.412.8 ± 1.5< 0.001
Allium vegetables, g/d13.7 ± 2.418.0 ± 2.325.3 ± 2.341.4 ± 2.4< 0.001
Total energy, Kcal/d1981 ± 1132171 ± 1132703 ± 1133383 ± 113< 0.001
Carbohydrate, % of total energy56.5 ± 0.756.7 ± 0.757.2 ± 0.757.3 ± 0.70.82
Protein, % of total energy13.2 ± 0.212.8 ± 0.213.1 ± 0.213.4 ± 0.20.33
Fat, % of total energy32.4 ± 0.732.5 ± 0.732.3 ± 0.732.1 ± 0.70.98
SFA, % of total energy11.4 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.310.9 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.30.64
MUFA, % of total energy11.2 ± 0.311.0 ± 0.311.2 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.30.92
PUFA, % of total energy6.5 ± 0.26.6 ± 0.26.7 ± 0.26.5 ± 0.20.90
Total fiber, g/d27.4 ± 2.430.5 ± 2.442.0 ± 2.449.6 ± 2.4< 0.001
Cholesterol, g/d190 ± 14205 ± 14267 ± 14316 ± 14< 0.001
Magnesium, mg/d301 ± 20324 ± 20433 ± 20547 ± 20< 0.001
Potassium, mg/d2835 ± 1713127 ± 1714228 ± 1715588 ± 171< 0.001
Whole grain, g/d90 ± 1692 ± 1694 ± 1692 ± 160.251
Refined grain, g/d356 ± 26354 ± 26359 ± 26351 ± 260.632
Fruit, g/d272 ± 31.6308 ± 31.6453 ± 31.6609 ± 31.6< 0.001
Nuts6.9 ± 1.47.9 ± 1.39.8 ± 1.314.5 ± 1.30.001
Legumes11.9 ± 2.212.0 ± 2.213.9 ± 2.214.5 ± 2.20.879
Dairy products146 ± 39.7517 ± 39.7609 ± 39.7704 ± 39.70.005
Meat, poultry, fish, g/d53.8 ± 10.156.1 ± 10.159.1 ± 10.152.7 ± 10.10.548

Table 3 presents ORs of MetS associated with the total and various types of vegetables among children and adolescents. Compared to the first quartile, a higher consumption of total- (≥ 350 g/d) and allium (≥ 30 g/d) vegetables in the fourth quartile was significantly and inversely associated with risk of MetS in unadjusted model (model 1), the adjusted model for demographic characteristics and dietary intake (model 2), and BMI (model 3 in allium vegetables). Consumption of green leafy vegetables in the third (21.4-38.3 g/d) versus the first quartile (≤ 13.5 g/d) was significantly and inversely associated with risk of MetS in the unadjusted (model 1) and the model adjusted for demographic characteristics and dietary intakes (model 2); further adjustment for BMI attenuated these associations. Among vegetables, fruity-, root-, stalk-, starchy-, cabbage, and potatoes, were not associated with MetS among children and adolescents.

Table 3 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) for metabolic syndrome across quartiles of total and various types of vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Quartiles of total- and various types of vegetable consumption
P value forTrend1
1234
Total vegetables
Median intake, g/d104179265441
Range of intake, g/d≤ 146147-217218-343≥ 350
Model 110.66 (0.30-1.47)0.54 (0.23–1.25)0.42 (0.17–0.92)0.06
Model 210.54 (0.21-1.46)0.42 (0.16-1.07)0.36 (0.14-0.94)0.04
Model 310.53 (0.20-1.46)0.41 (0.15-1.10)0.35 (0.13-0.95)0.04
Allium vegetables
Median intake, g/d2.710.822.851.5
Range of intake, g/d≤6.26.3-17.317.4-30.5≥ 30.6
Model 110.68 (0.31-1.47)0.44 (0.19-1.05)0.34 (0.13-0.87)0.024
Model 210.55 (0.23-1.31)0.27 (0.11-0.74)0.21 (0.11-0.64)0.006
Model 310.56 (0.24-1.32)0.35 (0.13-0.89)0.27 (0.14-0.75)0.012
Green leafy vegetables
Median intake, g/d9.117.627.354.4
Range of intake, g/d≤13.513.6-21.321.4-38.3≥ 38.4
Model 110.42 (0.18-0.98)0.32 (0.13- 0.80)0.58 (0.26-1.27)0.37
Model 210.40 (0.16-1.02)0.32 (0.12-0.89)0.81 (0.32-2.01)0.98
Model 310.42 (0.16-1.11)0.40 (0.13-0.91)1.12 (0.39-3.19)0.51
Fruity vegetables
Median intake, g/d4293145263
Range of intake, g/d≤ 6970-115116-211≥ 212
Model 110.61 (0.25-1.47)0.61 (0.25–1.47)1.08 (0.49–2.37)0.69
Model 210.65 (0.25-1.65)0.64 (0.25-1.65)1.01 (0.38-2.68)0.34
Model 310.71 (0.27-1.87)0.84 (0.32-2.23)1.65 (0.57-4.80)0.44
Root vegetables
Median intake, g/d2.17.310.034.4
Range of intake, g/d≤ 4.24.3-9.910.0-21.9≥ 22.0
Model 110.57 (0.20-1.64)2.23 (0.99-5.03)1.11 (0.45-2.74)0.89
Model 210.72 (0.24-2.12)1.74 (0.72-4.17)1.13 (0.43-2.97)0.87
Model 310.68 (0.22-2.07)1.88 (0.75-4.72)1.45 (0.50-4.13)0.51
Stalk vegetables
Median intake, g/d0.00.21.02.5
Range of intake, g/d≤ 0.000.1-0.50.6-1.1≥ 1.2
Model 110.57 (0.24-1.36)0.54 (0.23-1.29)0.88 (0.40-1.94)0.86
Model 210.52 (0.20-1.36)0.51 (0.20-1.31)1.09 (0.46-2.58)0.51
Model 310.61 (0.23-1.62)0.57 (0.21-1.51)1.32 (0.52-3.34)0.34
Potatoes
Median intake, g/d2.410.320.736.3
Range of intake, g/d≤4.84.9-10.410.5-20.8≥ 20.9
Model 110.69 (0.32-1.50)0.97 (0.41- 2.28)0.80 (0.32-1.99)0.84
Model 210.54 (0.23- 1.27)0.86 (0.34-2.21)0.68 (0.25-1.85)0.72
Model 310.58 (0.23-1.44)1.03 (0.38- 2.76)0.55 (0.17-1.68)0.54
Starchy vegetables
Median intake, g/d1.94.78.218.2
Range of intake, g/d≤ 3.33.4-5.85.-12.6≥ 12.7
Model 110.91 (0.39-2.11)1.0 (0.44-2.27)0.66 (0.27-1.62)0.36
Model 210.92 (0.37-2.31)0.93 (0.38-2.26)0.60 (0.22-1.62)0.29
Model 310.99 (0.38-2.56)0.80 (0.30-2.13)0.80 (0.26-2.45)0.41
Cabbage
Median intake, g/d0.01.96.215.3
Range of intake, g/d≤ 0.00.1 – 3.13.2-6.2≥ 6.3
Model 110.74 (0.36-1.52)1.12 (0.40-3.14)0.54 (0.21-1.38)0.18
Model 210.79 (0.36-1.71)1.25 (0.42-3.79)0.51 (0.18-1.45)0.07
Model 310.94 (0.42-2.10)1.50 (0.48-4.69)0.56 (0.18-1.71)0.09

Table 4 presents ORs for MetS based intake of total and various types of vegetable consumption (above/below the medians) among participants with 0, 1, or 2 components of MetS at baseline. Among participants with 1 component of MetS, green leafy- and allium vegetables reduced the risk of MetS by 71% (0.23, 95%CI: 0.07-0.71) and 77% (0.29, 95%CI: 0.07-0.71), after adjustment for confounding factors. No association was found between total-, fruity-, root-, stalk-, starchy vegetables, cabbage, and potatoes and risk of MetS among participant with ≥ 2 components at baseline.

Table 4 Multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) for metabolic syndrome based intake of total and various types of vegetable consumption (above/below the medians) among participants with 0, 1, or 2 components of metabolic syndrome at baseline: Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
< median≥ median< median≥ median< median≥ median
Total vegetables, g/d
0 component10.48 (0.12-1.94)10.77 (0.14-4.05)10.82 (0.15-4.29)
1 component10.68 (0.27-1.71)10.62 (0.21-1.83)10.67 (0.23-1.99)
2 component11.98 (0.61-6.42)12.00 (0.49-8.18)12.24 (0.53-9.39)
Allium vegetables
0 component10.77 (0.21-2.85)10.69 (0.17-2.76)10.54 (0.12-2.42)
1 component10.25 (0.08-0.73)10.25 (0.08-0.76)10.23 (0.07-0.71)
2 component10.49 (0.16-1.52)10.51 (0.15-1.78)10.48 (0.13-1.69)
Green leafy vegetables
0 component10.81 (0.22-2.98)11.04 (0.25-4.26)11.10 (0.25-4.72)
1 component10.31 (0.11-0.84)10.31 (0.09-0.97)10.29 (0.09-0.95)
2 component11.01 (0.33-3.08)11.43 (0.39-5.18)11.39 (0.38-5.06)
Fruity vegetables
0 component11.13 (0.31-4.07)11.15 (0.28-4.71)10.88 (0.20-3.84)
1 component0.66 (0.26-1.67)10.60 (0.21-1.69)10.64 (0.22-1.82)
2 component1.51 (0.48-4.67)12.02 (0.52-7.87)12.11 (0.53-8.32)
Root vegetables
0 component12.36 (0.59-9.43)12.57 (0.58-11.3)12.31 (0.49-10.7)
1 component12.20 (0.84-5.76)11.68 (0.61-4.75)11.67 (0.58-4.73)
2 component11.97 (0.63-6.14)11.48 (0.43-5.08)11.31 (0.36-4.69)
Stalk vegetables
0 component11.28 (0.35-4.72)11.33 (0.33-5.30)11.08 (0.26-4.52)
1 component10.72 (0.28-1.81)10.73 (0.27-2.00)10.74 (0.27-2.02)
2 component11.18 (039-3.58)11.09 (0.32-3.76)11.13 (0.32-3.97)
Potatoes
0 component11.36 (0.34-5.45)11.97 (0.39-9.90)12.12 (0.39-11.4)
1 component10.56 (0.22-1.42)10.45 (0.17-1.22)10.45 (0.16-1.24)
2 component11.91 (0.55-6.66)11.35 (0.34-5.39)11.55 (0.36-6.65)
Starchy vegetables
0 component10.64 (0.17-2.36)10.92 (0.21-3.90)11.06 (0.24-4.60)
1 component10.78 (0.31-1.96)10.80 (0.29-2.18)10.84 (0.30-2.32)
2 component11.08 (0.35-3.30)10.57 (0.15-2.11)10.56 (0.15-2.14)
Cabbage
0 component10.64 (0.13-3.12)10.88 (0.16-4.92)10.89 (0.15-5.08)
1 component11.19 (0.46-3.07)11.64 (0.59-4.59)11.54 (0.55-4.32)
2 component10.48 (0.12-1.91)10.53 (0.18-2.43)10.45 (0.09-2.22)
DISCUSSION

This prospective study of Iranian children and adolescents reported an inverse association between total vegetable consumption and MetS risk. Among vegetable subgroups, consumption of green leafy- and allium vegetables was inversely associated with risk of MetS after adjustment for the main potential confounders. In addition, we found that among participants with 1 component of MetS, consumption of allium- and green leafy vegetables reduce risk of Mets. However limited sample size in participants with 0 and 2 components of MetS may influence the association between consumption of vegetables and MetS.

Although the effects of vegetable intake on MetS have been investigated by numerous epidemiological and interventional studies, most findings remain inconclusive[7,8]. Furthermore, in relation to type 2 diabetes, the efficacy of vegetable consumption is still not clear; some studies report inverse associations[9], while others report none[10,11]. Another documented a threshold of around two-three servings/day of vegetables, after which diabetes and CVD risk did not reduce further[12,13,16]. In the current study, we found that consumption of vegetables, median intake of 440 g/wk, reduced risk of MetS by 60% among children and adolescents, findings consistent with dietary pattern studies in which healthy diets rich in vegetables are associated with a reduced risk of MetS and its components in children and adolescents[39,40]. However, in a comprehensive systematic review of studies addressing fruit and vegetable consumption and cardiovascular risk indicators in adolescents, only one-third of the studies showed significant inverse associations of fruit and vegetable intake and MetS and its components[41]. This inconsistency may be because of differences in the amounts and specific subgroups of vegetables intake in different studies. More prospective and interventional studies are needed to specify the effects of various types of vegetables.

The association between green leafy vegetables and nutrition-related chronic disease was less consistent in prospective studies. In the “CHANCES” project, results from NIH-AARP and EPIC Elderly (All, Greece) cohorts reported consumption of green leafy vegetables is associated with a reduced [OR: 0.87 (0.84–0.90)] and increased [OR: 1.23 (1.01–1.50), OR: 1.52 (1.13–2.04)] risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively. The pooled analysis indicated no overall association between intake of green leafy vegetables, type 2 diabetes[42], and CVD risk[16]. Zhang et al[7], in a meta-analysis of observational studies, concluded that consumption of green leafy vegetables might not be associated with MetS risk. Despite the results given above, several different meta-analyses suggest that green leafy vegetable consumption significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes and CVD[9,11,16,18]; an increase of 0.2 serving/d of green leafy vegetables was associated with 13% reduction in type 2 diabetes[23]. Our study showed that although consumption of green leafy vegetables significantly reduced risk of MetS to a median intake of 27 g/wk, there was a threshold of around 30 g/d, after which this inverse association disappeared; similar reductions of associated risk until the last median intake was similarly reported in two previous cohort studies[22,23]. In the Women’s Health Study (median intake 0.92 serving/d), and the Shanghai Women‘s Health Study (median intake 94.1 g/d), type 2 diabetes risk reduced up to the fourth quartile of intake but not further[22,23]. Green leafy vegetables contain a maximum amount of nitrate, thus a risk-benefit effect of nitrate should be considered. The adequate intake for nitrate (3.7 mg/kg body weight/day equivalent to 222 mg nitrate per day for a 60 kg adult) is constantly exceeded in several dietary patterns. This overconsumption of dietary nitrate could hence be responsible for the disappearance of an inverse association between green leafy vegetable intake and MetS and the risk of type 2 diabetes after the third quartile of intake in our study and those of others[43].

In the current study, allium vegetables were inversely associated with risk for MetS among children and adolescents. Positive effects of A. sativum on control of MetS and its components, especially dyslipidemia and diabetes, have been reported previously[44]. Moreover, several prospective studies have been conducted regarding the positive effect of allium vegetables on CVD outcomes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, ischemic heart disease mortality, cerebral vascular disease mortality, and myocardial infarction[17,19,20] but not all[21,45]. Allium is a rich source of phytonu-trients, including organosulfur and phenolic compounds; their consumption two to three times per day improves the cardio-metabolic risk factors among individuals with diabetes and MetS, reduces inflammation and oxidative stress, and has a vasodilator effect[46-49].

Few studies have investigated the association between cruciferous vegetables and MetS risk, and most of these report that dietary patterns rich in vegetables, including cruciferous, reduce the occurrence of MetS[50,51]. Although our findings and also those of some previous studies found no protective effects of cruciferous vegetables[21,45], others have reported a potential reduction in the risk of ischemic heart disease mortality, coronary heart disease, and subclinical atherosclerosis, which may be due to the lower amount of cruciferous vegetable intake in our study compared to others[16,17].

In the current study, no association between fruity-, root-, stalk-, starchy vege-tables, and potatoes and MetS was found. Results of research on the consumption of these vegetables and the risk of MetS is controversial, which may be due to the differences in the amounts and preparation methods used in these studies[16,17,21,23,45,52-55]. Further investigations of various types of vegetable (e.g., fruity-, starchy-, and root vegetables) consumption on MetS are needed.

Strengths and limitations

Major strengths of this study include the population-based prospective design of the study, participants of which were representative of Tehran’s population, the large sample size, and use of a valid and reliable FFQ administered by a trained nutritionist (reducing any potential measurement errors), and the minimized loss to follow-up bias (response rate 86%). Nevertheless, the present study has a few limitations. First, MetS is heterogeneous; despite carefully adjusting for a range of known confounding factors, other factors associated with MetS among children and adolescents, including heredity and puberty status, were not addressed because of a lack of information. In addition, regarding the different types of vegetables (other than allium and green leafy vegetables) included in the analysis of this study, the failure to detect associa-tions between consumption of these types of vegetables and MetS may be due to the narrow range of dietary intake among our participants.

In conclusion, findings of this prospective study indicate that consumption of green leafy vegetables and allium vegetables were associated with lower risk of MetS during 3 years of follow-up in children and adolescents.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge Ms Niloofar Shiva for critical editing of English grammar and syntax of the manuscript. We express our appreciation to the participants of this study for their collaboration.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by the clustering of metabolic abnormalities, such as glucose intolerance, central obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The primary goal for MetS management is to alleviate all metabolic risk factors through effective lifestyle changes. Research indicates healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean and Dietary approach to stop hypertension diets, all of which recommend high intakes of vegetables, improve MetS and type 2 diabetes; however, data on the associations between vegetable intake as an individual dietary component and MetS remain inconsistent.

Research motivation

This inconsistency of findings between chronic disease such as MetS and vegetable consumption might probably be due to differences in specific subgroups of vegetables in different studies. Various types of vegetables differ in nutritional content, energy, fiber, and phytochemicals.

Research objectives

The aim of our study was to investigate the association between intake of various types of vegetables and MetS after 3.6 years of follow-up in Tehranian children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years.

Research methods

This prospective population-based study was conducted within the framework of the Tehran lipid and glucose study, an ongoing, prospective community based study, aimed at preventing non-communicable disease and reducing its risk factors through promoting healthy lifestyles. Of the 4920 participants enrolled in the present study, 621 children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years agreed to complete the food frequency questionnaire. Those who had missing data on dietary intake or MetS components, those who had baseline MetS, and participants who over- or under-reported, were all excluded. Finally, data of 424 participants were used for analysis. Dietary intake information over the previous year was assessed using a 168-item, validated, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Vegetable consumption was assessed using 28 vegetables and reported as grams per day. General classification of our subgroups of vegetables (green leafy-, allium-, stalk-, fruity-, root-, starchy-, cabbage, and potatoes) was based on EPIC-InterAct study. Blood samples were drawn after 12-14 h of overnight fasting and glucose, triglyceride and HDL-C concentrations were measured. Blood pressure and waist circumference were assessed using standard tools. MetS was defined using Cool et al criteria for individual <18 year. For participant aged ≥ 18 years, Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation criterial was used to define the MetS.

Research results

Among 424 children and adolescents free of MetS at baseline, 47 (11%) were diagnosed with MetS during a median follow-up period of 3.6 years. Higher consumption of total- (≥ 350 g/d) and allium (≥ 30 g/d) vegetables were significantly and inversely associated with risk of MetS after adjustment for confounding factors. Consumption of green leafy vegetables in the third (21.4-38.3 g/d) versus the first quartile (≤ 13.5 g/d) was significantly and inversely associated with risk of MetS in the unadjusted (model 1) and the model adjusted for demographic characteristics and dietary intakes (model 2); further adjustment for BMI attenuated these associations. Among vegetables, fruity-, root-, stalk-, starchy-, cabbage, and potatoes were not associated with MetS among children and adolescents.

Research conclusions

Consumption of green leafy vegetables and allium vegetables were associated with lower risk of MetS during 3 years of follow-up in children and adolescents.

Research perspectives

Future studies addressing the underlying mechanisms of allium and green leafy vegetables in reducing the risk of MetS are needed.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism

Country of origin: Iran

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Nakajima K S-Editor: Ji FF L-Editor: Filipodia E-Editor: Wang J

References
1.  Bussler S, Penke M, Flemming G, Elhassan YS, Kratzsch J, Sergeyev E, Lipek T, Vogel M, Spielau U, Körner A, de Giorgis T, Kiess W. Novel Insights in the Metabolic Syndrome in Childhood and Adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;88:181-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Camhi SM, Katzmarzyk PT. Tracking of cardiometabolic risk factor clustering from childhood to adulthood. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5:122-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 113]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  DeBoer MD, Gurka MJ, Woo JG, Morrison JA. Severity of the metabolic syndrome as a predictor of type 2 diabetes between childhood and adulthood: the Princeton Lipid Research Cohort Study. Diabetologia. 2015;58:2745-2752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC, Spertus JA, Costa F; American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735-2752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 216]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 217]  [Article Influence: 11.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Godos J, Zappalà G, Bernardini S, Giambini I, Bes-Rastrollo M, Martinez-Gonzalez M. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome occurrence: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;68:138-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 125]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129]  [Article Influence: 18.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi T, Azizi F. Beneficial effects of a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension eating plan on features of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2823-2831.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 351]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 325]  [Article Influence: 17.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Zhang Y, Zhang DZ. Associations of vegetable and fruit consumption with metabolic syndrome. A meta-analysis of observational studies. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:1693-1703.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Shin JY, Kim JY, Kang HT, Han KH, Shim JY. Effect of fruits and vegetables on metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66:416-425.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Cooper AJ, Forouhi NG, Ye Z, Buijsse B, Arriola L, Balkau B, Barricarte A, Beulens JW, Boeing H, Büchner FL, Dahm CC, de Lauzon-Guillain B, Fagherazzi G, Franks PW, Gonzalez C, Grioni S, Kaaks R, Key TJ, Masala G, Navarro C, Nilsson P, Overvad K, Panico S, Ramón Quirós J, Rolandsson O, Roswall N, Sacerdote C, Sánchez MJ, Slimani N, Sluijs I, Spijkerman AM, Teucher B, Tjonneland A, Tumino R, Sharp SJ, Langenberg C, Feskens EJ, Riboli E, Wareham NJ; InterAct Consortium. Fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes: EPIC-InterAct prospective study and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66:1082-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 207]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 185]  [Article Influence: 15.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Carter P, Gray LJ, Troughton J, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 506]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 469]  [Article Influence: 33.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Li M, Fan Y, Zhang X, Hou W, Tang Z. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 246]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 248]  [Article Influence: 24.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Wu Y, Zhang D, Jiang X, Jiang W. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25:140-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Hamer M, Chida Y. Intake of fruit, vegetables, and antioxidants and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2007;25:2361-2369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 160]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Roberts JL, Moreau R. Functional properties of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) phytochemicals and bioactives. Food Funct. 2016;7:3337-3353.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Chung LY. The antioxidant properties of garlic compounds: allyl cysteine, alliin, allicin, and allyl disulfide. J Med Food. 2006;9:205-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 237]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 197]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Buil-Cosiales P, Toledo E, Salas-Salvadó J, Zazpe I, Farràs M, Basterra-Gortari FJ, Diez-Espino J, Estruch R, Corella D, Ros E, Marti A, Gómez-Gracia E, Ortega-Calvo M, Arós F, Moñino M, Serra-Majem L, Pintó X, Lamuela-Raventós RM, Babio N, Gonzalez JI, Fitó M, Martínez-González MA; PREDIMED investigators. Association between dietary fibre intake and fruit, vegetable or whole-grain consumption and the risk of CVD: results from the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea (PREDIMED) trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;116:534-546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Blekkenhorst LC, Bondonno CP, Lewis JR, Devine A, Zhu K, Lim WH, Woodman RJ, Beilin LJ, Prince RL, Hodgson JM. Cruciferous and Allium Vegetable Intakes are Inversely Associated With 15-Year Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Deaths in Older Adult Women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:pii: e006558.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Pollock RL. The effect of green leafy and cruciferous vegetable intake on the incidence of cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;5:2048004016661435.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Momenan AA, Azizi F. Allium vegetable intakes and the incidence of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes in adults: a longitudinal follow-up study. J Hypertens. 2017;35:1909-1916.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Galeone C, Tavani A, Pelucchi C, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Allium vegetable intake and risk of acute myocardial infarction in Italy. Eur J Nutr. 2009;48:120-123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Yu D, Zhang X, Gao YT, Li H, Yang G, Huang J, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Shu XO. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of CHD: results from prospective cohort studies of Chinese adults in Shanghai. Br J Nutr. 2014;111:353-362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Villegas R, Shu XO, Gao YT, Yang G, Elasy T, Li H, Zheng W. Vegetable but not fruit consumption reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese women. J Nutr. 2008;138:574-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Liu S, Serdula M, Janket SJ, Cook NR, Sesso HD, Willett WC, Manson JE, Buring JE. A prospective study of fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2993-2996.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 145]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Slavin JL, Lloyd B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv Nutr. 2012;3:506-516.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1045]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 912]  [Article Influence: 76.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Momenan AA, Hadaegh F, Mirmiran P, Hedayati M, Mehrabi Y, Zahedi-Asl S; Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study Group. Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials. 2009;10:5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 585]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 618]  [Article Influence: 41.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Hosseini-Esfahani F, Jessri M, Mirmiran P, Bastan S, Azizi F. Adherence to dietary recommendations and risk of metabolic syndrome: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Metabolism. 2010;59:1833-1842.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Dietary Reference Intakes. Panel on Macronutrients, Panel on the Definition of Dietary Fiber, Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients, Subcommittee on Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes, and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2015.  Available from: https://www.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fnic_uploads/energy_full_report.pdf/.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Esfahani FH, Asghari G, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Epidemiol. 2010;20:150-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 396]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 521]  [Article Influence: 37.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ghafarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H.  The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of food. Tehran, Iran: Keshavarzi Press 1999; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Asghari G, Rezazadeh A, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1109-1117.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 185]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 215]  [Article Influence: 17.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Delshad M, Ghanbarian A, Ghaleh NR, Amirshekari G, Askari S, Azizi F. Reliability and validity of the modifiable activity questionnaire for an Iranian urban adolescent population. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger P, Nguyen M, Dietz WH. Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:821-827.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1508]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1430]  [Article Influence: 68.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, Kitzmiller J, Knowler WC, Lebovitz H, Lernmark A, Nathan D, Palmer J, Rizza R, Saudek C, Shaw J, Steffes M, Stern M, Tuomilehto J, Zimmet P; Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3160-3167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2379]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2529]  [Article Influence: 120.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 1996;98:649-658.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Kelishadi R, Gouya MM, Ardalan G, Hosseini M, Motaghian M, Delavari A, Majdzadeh R, Heidarzadeh A, Mahmoud-Arabi MS, Riazi MM; CASPIAN Study Group. First reference curves of waist and hip circumferences in an Asian population of youths: CASPIAN study. J Trop Pediatr. 2007;53:158-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Yin Q, Chen X, Li L, Zhou R, Huang J, Yang D. Apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio is a good predictive marker of metabolic syndrome and pre-metabolic syndrome in Chinese adolescent women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:203-209.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC; International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; Hational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640-1645.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8720]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9581]  [Article Influence: 638.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Azizi F, Hadaegh F, Khalili D, Esteghamati A, Hosseinpanah F, Delavari A, Larijani B, Mirmiran P, Zabetian A, Mehrabi Y, Kelishadi R, Aghajani H. Appropriate definition of metabolic syndrome among Iranian adults: report of the Iranian National Committee of Obesity. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13:426-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Ambrosini GL, Huang RC, Mori TA, Hands BP, O'Sullivan TA, de Klerk NH, Beilin LJ, Oddy WH. Dietary patterns and markers for the metabolic syndrome in Australian adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20:274-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Shang X, Li Y, Liu A, Zhang Q, Hu X, Du S, Ma J, Xu G, Li Y, Guo H, Du L, Ma G. Dietary pattern and its association with the prevalence of obesity and related cardiometabolic risk factors among Chinese children. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Collese TS, Nascimento-Ferreira MV, de Moraes ACF, Rendo-Urteaga T, Bel-Serrat S, Moreno LA, Carvalho HB. Role of fruits and vegetables in adolescent cardiovascular health: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2017;75:339-349.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Boffetta P, Bobak M, Borsch-Supan A, Brenner H, Eriksson S, Grodstein F, Jansen E, Jenab M, Juerges H, Kampman E, Kee F, Kuulasmaa K, Park Y, Tjonneland A, van Duijn C, Wilsgaard T, Wolk A, Trichopoulos D, Bamia C, Trichopoulou A. The Consortium on Health and Ageing: Network of Cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES) project--design, population and data harmonization of a large-scale, international study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29:929-936.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Clements WT, Lee SR, Bloomer RJ. Nitrate ingestion: a review of the health and physical performance effects. Nutrients. 2014;6:5224-5264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Hosseini A, Hosseinzadeh H. A review on the effects of Allium sativum (Garlic) in metabolic syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015;38:1147-1157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A. Total and specific fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of stroke: a prospective study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227:147-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Choudhary PR, Jani RD, Sharma MS. Effect of Raw Crushed Garlic (Allium sativum L.) on Components of Metabolic Syndrome. J Diet Suppl. 2018;15:499-506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Tjokroprawiro A, Pikir BS, Budhiarta AA, Pranawa, Soewondo H, Donosepoetro M, Budhianto FX, Wibowo JA, Tanuwidjaja SJ, Pangemanan M. Metabolic effects of onion and green beans on diabetic patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1983;141 Suppl:671-676.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Gomaa AMS, Abdelhafez AT, Aamer HA. Garlic (Allium sativum) exhibits a cardioprotective effect in experimental chronic renal failure rat model by reducing oxidative stress and controlling cardiac Na+/K+-ATPase activity and Ca2+ levels. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018;23:913-920.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Chu CC, Wu WS, Shieh JP, Chu HL, Lee CP, Duh PD. The Anti-Inflammatory and Vasodilating Effects of Three Selected Dietary Organic Sulfur Compounds from Allium Species. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8:pii: E5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Esmaillzadeh A, Kimiagar M, Mehrabi Y, Azadbakht L, Hu FB, Willett WC. Dietary patterns, insulin resistance, and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:910-918.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 321]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 332]  [Article Influence: 19.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Deshmukh-Taskar PR, O'Neil CE, Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Liu Y, Gustat J, Berenson GS. Dietary patterns associated with metabolic syndrome, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:2493-2503.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 113]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Farhadnejad H, Teymoori F, Asghari G, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. The Association of Potato Intake With Risk for Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Adults. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:613-618.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Goshtasebi A, Hosseinpour-Niazi S, Mirmiran P, Lamyian M, Moghaddam Banaem L, Azizi F. Pre-pregnancy consumption of starchy vegetables and legumes and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among Tehranian women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;139:131-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Ylönen SK, Virtanen SM, Groop L; Botnia Research Group. The intake of potatoes and glucose metabolism in subjects at high risk for Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007;24:1049-1050.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Montonen J, Järvinen R, Heliövaara M, Reunanen A, Aromaa A, Knekt P. Food consumption and the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:441-448.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 155]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 156]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]