Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2017; 9(1): 1-3
Published online Jan 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i1.1
Proteomics approaches for early detection and targeted therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma
Tripti Khare, Sharad Khare, Jamal A Ibdah
Tripti Khare, Sharad Khare, Jamal A Ibdah, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, United States
Sharad Khare, Jamal A Ibdah, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans’ Hospital, Columbia, MO 65201, United States
Author contributions: Khare T conceived the topic, reviewed the literature, designed and wrote the manuscript; Khare S edited and provided intellectual input into the design and execution of manuscript; Ibdah JA edited and communicated the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Jamal A Ibdah, MD, PhD, Professor, Director, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, 1 University Blvd, Columbia, MO 65212, United States. ibdahj@health.missouri.edu
Telephone: +1-573-8827349 Fax: +1-573-8844595
Received: August 8, 2016
Peer-review started: August 10, 2016
First decision: September 12, 2016
Revised: September 28, 2016
Accepted: November 21, 2016
Article in press: November 22, 2016
Published online: January 15, 2017


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related mortality worldwide. HCC incidences have increased worldwide though more prevalent in Asia and Africa. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections are mostly responsible of increased number of HCC cases. Biomarkers can help early detection and improve treatment regimen in patients as advanced stage is chemo-refractive with limited treatment options. Potential of proteomics in finding new biomarkers for early detection has been explored more recently. Future developments in this area rely on how efficiently we manage vast amount of data generated by these techniques and speed up the clinical trials to improve patient care.

Key Words: Proteomics, Cancer, Biomarker, Hepatocellular carcinoma

Core tip: Despite ongoing development in treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), effective biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment for HCC are not available. Profiling of proteins puts proteomics on the forefront to understand promising new biomarkers and drug targets for HCC. HCC proteome database would be an important step towards identifying tumor associated proteins as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of HCC.


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is most common in underdeveloped and developing countries[1,2]. Etiological agents of HCC vary in different part of world. HCC is more common in Asia due to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections whereas hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major cause of HCC in western countries and Japan. Besides infection, alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as well as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis also accounts for HCC in developing and developed countries. Aflatoxins produced by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus are the risk factors for HCC in China and sub-Saharan Africa. Inherited metabolic diseases, against a background of cirrhosis or without cirrhosis are associated with HCC. Smoking, estrogens, androgens, and thorium oxide (thorotrast) are also associated with HCC. Alcohol is responsible for HCC in both developing and developed countries[3]. Less common and emerging risk factors also include diabetes and obesity.

Curative surgery is not possible in HCC patients due to late diagnosis and/or advanced underlying liver cirrhosis[4]. Only limited treatment options such as resection and transplantation, radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization with marginal clinical benefits are available for majority of patients. The cytotoxic systemic therapy options usually fail in patients with HCC due to the chemoresistance[5]. Though most commonly used drug is Doxorubicin[6], a combination of Sorafenib and Doxorubicin therapy is more beneficial in patients with advanced HCC[7]. Recent reviews summarized a list of agents for the treatment of HCC[8,9]. Despite ongoing development in treatment for HCC, effective biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment for HCC are not available.

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a biomarker, currently used for screening patients at-risk of HCC. AFP is not a good marker as many other liver diseases can also increase blood level of AFP. Furthermore, AFP is not always elevated in early stages of cancer development, when therapy is mostly effective. Other serum markers for HCC have now been identified in addition to AFP. These are, for example, an abnormal prothrombin molecule, des-γ-carboxyprothrombin, cell-surface proteoglycan, glypican-3, glycoprotein, osteopontin, golgi protein 73, microRNA-21, α-1-fucosidase, human telomerase reverse transcriptase, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and transforming growth factor-β1. Data suggest that a combination of biomarker may be more effective[10]. More importantly, nine Food and Drug Administration-approved blood based cancer markers are used to monitor the treatment[11]. Profiling of proteins puts proteomics on the forefront to understand promising new biomarkers and drug targets for HCC.

HCC proteome database would be an important step towards identifying tumor associated proteins as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of HCC[12]. Basic proteomic approaches including 2-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE), reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, free-flow electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, ion-exchange chromatography along with tools such as MS-based imaging of tissue biopsies, plasmon resonance technique coupled to MS, matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS), 2DE-LC-MS/MS and laser capture microdissection enable the study of cancer proteomics[13]. Most significant advancement in 2DE is two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), with greater sensitivity and dynamic range due to use of fluorescent cyanine dyes (Cye2, Cye3, and Cye5)[14]. Analysis of HBV related HCC tumor and non-tumor tissues using 2D-DIGE revealed increased expression of heat-shock proteins (hsp70, hsp90) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (C1 and C2) as tumor biomarkers[14].

Bioinformatics is essential for proteomic analyses. The Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) has developed the standards for experimental strategies and data exchange[15]. An open basic XML (extensible markup language) representation of MS data, named mzXML, helped accelerate data management, interpretation and dissemination using different instrumentation platforms[16]. Commercial tools available to the proteomics community to analyze two-dimensional electrophoresis protein patterns include Delta2D (Decodon), BioNumerics 2D (Applied maths), Melanie (GeneBio), Imagemaster 2D (GE healthcare), Progenesis Samespots (NonLinear Dynamics), PDQuest (BioRad Laboratories), REDFIN (Ludesi), ProteinMineTM (Scimagix), and the Z3:2D-Gel image Analysis System (Compugen Limited).

Global analysis of proteins faces several challenges, for example, tertiary structure of proteins, detection of low abundance proteins and reversible modifications such as glycosylation and phosphorylation when compared to studies of genes and transcripts. Furthermore, RNA splicing can produce splice variants that are homologous but differ in function. The revolution in the field of proteomics can hopefully overcome some of these hurdles. In last forty years, only few new tests have been added in clinics. A four-way collaboration is required between the research laboratory (for developing the fundamental concept), the diagnostic lab or industry (converting the concept into a hands-on reliable tool), the clinical laboratory (assessing the tool in real life practices), and the clinicians (providing clinical specimens) for bringing a biomarker from the research lab successfully into the clinical practice[17].


Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A, A, A, A

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Berlakovich GA, Boin IFSF, Goral V, Tarazov PG S- Editor: Qiu S L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu HL

1.  Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362:1907-1917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3076]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1291]  [Article Influence: 170.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12780]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11887]  [Article Influence: 798.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Seow TK, Liang RC, Leow CK, Chung MC. Hepatocellular carcinoma: from bedside to proteomics. Proteomics. 2001;1:1249-1263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208-1236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4104]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3888]  [Article Influence: 256.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Yang XR, Xu Y, Yu B, Zhou J, Qiu SJ, Shi GM, Zhang BH, Wu WZ, Shi YH, Wu B. High expression levels of putative hepatic stem/progenitor cell biomarkers related to tumour angiogenesis and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2010;59:953-962.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 183]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 180]  [Article Influence: 16.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Wang Q, Zhong YJ, Yuan JP, Shao LH, Zhang J, Tang L, Liu SP, Hong YP, Firestone RA, Li Y. Targeting therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin prodrug PDOX increases anti-metastatic effect and reduces toxicity: a preclinical study. J Transl Med. 2013;11:192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Abou-Alfa GK, Johnson P, Knox JJ, Capanu M, Davidenko I, Lacava J, Leung T, Gansukh B, Saltz LB. Doxorubicin plus sorafenib vs doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010;304:2154-2160.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 306]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 277]  [Article Influence: 27.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bertino G, Demma S, Ardiri A, Proiti M, Gruttadauria S, Toro A, Malaguarnera G, Bertino N, Malaguarnera M, Malaguarnera M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: novel molecular targets in carcinogenesis for future therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:203693.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Chan SL, Yeo W. Targeted therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: present and future. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:862-872.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Marrero JA, Feng Z, Wang Y, Nguyen MH, Befeler AS, Roberts LR, Reddy KR, Harnois D, Llovet JM, Normolle D. Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:110-118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 392]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 356]  [Article Influence: 32.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:845-856.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 975]  [Article Influence: 73.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Liang RC, Neo JC, Lo SL, Tan GS, Seow TK, Chung MC. Proteome database of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002;771:303-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Nelson RW, Nedelkov D, Tubbs KA. Biosensor chip mass spectrometry: a chip-based proteomics approach. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:1155-1163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Sun W, Xing B, Sun Y, Du X, Lu M, Hao C, Lu Z, Mi W, Wu S, Wei H. Proteome analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis: novel protein markers in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:1798-1808.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Orchard S, Hermjakob H, Julian RK, Runte K, Sherman D, Wojcik J, Zhu W, Apweiler R. Common interchange standards for proteomics data: Public availability of tools and schema. Proteomics. 2004;4:490-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Pedrioli PG, Eng JK, Hubley R, Vogelzang M, Deutsch EW, Raught B, Pratt B, Nilsson E, Angeletti RH, Apweiler R. A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1459-1466.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 564]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 527]  [Article Influence: 35.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sturgeon C, Hill R, Hortin GL, Thompson D. Taking a new biomarker into routine use--a perspective from the routine clinical biochemistry laboratory. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4:892-903.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]