BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Chowdappa R, Tiwari AR, Ranganath N, Kumar RV. Is there difference between anastomotic site and remnant stump carcinoma in gastric stump cancers? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10:307-313. [PMID: 31032099 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.12.03] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Rohr M, Aljabban J, Rudeski-Rohr T, Lessans S, Nakkina SP, Hadley D, Zhu X, Altomare DA. Meta-Analysis Reveals the Prognostic Relevance of Nuclear and Membrane-Associated Bile Acid Receptors in Gastric Cancer. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021;12:e00295. [PMID: 33492921 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000295] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Bronswijk M, Bourgain C, Pouillon L. An Unfortunate Consequence of Duodenogastric Reflux. Gastroenterology 2020;158:836-7. [PMID: 31404534 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.059] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Ramos MFKP, Pereira MA, Dias AR, Dantas ACB, Szor DJ, Ribeiro U Jr, Zilberstein B, Cecconello I. Remnant gastric cancer: An ordinary primary adenocarcinoma or a tumor with its own pattern? World J Gastrointest Surg 2021;13:366-78. [PMID: 33968303 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i4.366] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Ma F, Ma Y, Cui L, Zhao X, Wang B, Xue L, Wang H, Tian Y. Development and characterization of a mouse model of duodenogastric reflux. Life Sci 2020;260:118412. [PMID: 32926924 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118412] [Reference Citation Analysis]