Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2019; 11(8): 646-655
Published online Aug 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646
Published online Aug 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646
Multivariate analysis | ||
Factor | HR (95%CI) | P value |
Intervention vs controls | 0.99 (0.66-1.48) | 0.95 |
Age | 0.99 (0.97-1.01) | 0.39 |
Female gender | 1.36 (0.87-2.1) | 0.18 |
Etiology of cirrhosis | ||
EtOH vs HCV | 0.99 (0.13-7.77) | 0.99 |
NAFLD vs HCV | 1.03 (0.51-2.54) | 0.93 |
MELD score (for every 1 unit increment) | 1.03 (0.99-1.05) | 0.09 |
Index hospitalization length of stay (for every 1 d increment) | 0.99 (0.97-1.02) | 0.59 |
Discharge to home with home care vs home | 1.12 (0.69-2.01) | 0.55 |
Discharge to SNF vs home | 0.96 (0.51-1.83) | 0.91 |
- Citation: Rao BB, Sobotka A, Lopez R, Romero-Marrero C, Carey W. Outpatient telephonic transitional care after hospital discharge improves survival in cirrhotic patients. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(8): 646-655
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v11/i8/646.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646