BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Bughio F, Maggert KA. The peculiar genetics of the ribosomal DNA blurs the boundaries of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Chromosome Res 2019;27:19-30. [PMID: 30511202 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-018-9591-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Sharma D, Denmat SH, Matzke NJ, Hannan K, Hannan RD, O'Sullivan JM, Ganley ARD. A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. Genomics 2022;114:110430. [PMID: 35830947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110430] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Rodriguez-algarra F, Seaborne RAE, Danson AF, Yildizoglu S, Yoshikawa H, Law PP, Ahmad Z, Maudsley VA, Brew A, Holmes N, Ochôa M, Hodgkinson A, Marzi SJ, Pradeepa MM, Loose M, Holland ML, Rakyan VK. Genetic variation at mouse and human ribosomal DNA influences associated epigenetic states. Genome Biol 2022;23. [DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02617-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Keshavarz M, Savriama Y, Refki P, Reeves RG, Tautz D. Natural copy number variation of tandemly repeated regulatory SNORD RNAs leads to individual phenotypic differences in mice. Mol Ecol 2021. [PMID: 34252239 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16076] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Smirnov E, Chmúrčiaková N, Liška F, Bažantová P, Cmarko D. Variability of Human rDNA. Cells 2021;10:196. [PMID: 33498263 DOI: 10.3390/cells10020196] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ershova ES, Malinovskaya EM, Golimbet VE, Lezheiko TV, Zakharova NV, Shmarina GV, Veiko RV, Umriukhin PE, Kostyuk GP, Kutsev SI, Izhevskaya VL, Veiko NN, Kostyuk SV. Copy number variations of satellite III (1q12) and ribosomal repeats in health and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2020;223:199-212. [PMID: 32773342 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.07.022] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Garcia S, Wendel JF, Borowska-Zuchowska N, Aïnouche M, Kuderova A, Kovarik A. The Utility of Graph Clustering of 5S Ribosomal DNA Homoeologs in Plant Allopolyploids, Homoploid Hybrids, and Cryptic Introgressants. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:41. [PMID: 32117380 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00041] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Morton EA, Hall AN, Kwan E, Mok C, Queitsch K, Nandakumar V, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Brewer BJ, Waterston R, Queitsch C. Challenges and Approaches to Genotyping Repetitive DNA. G3 (Bethesda) 2020;10:417-30. [PMID: 31757929 DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400771] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Valori V, Tus K, Laukaitis C, Harris DT, LeBeau L, Maggert KA. Human rDNA copy number is unstable in metastatic breast cancers. Epigenetics 2020;15:85-106. [PMID: 31352858 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1649930] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Symonová R. Integrative rDNAomics-Importance of the Oldest Repetitive Fraction of the Eukaryote Genome. Genes (Basel) 2019;10:E345. [PMID: 31067804 DOI: 10.3390/genes10050345] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]