Cryopreservation for delayed circulating tumor cell isolation is a valid strategy for prognostic association of circulating tumor cells in gastroesophageal cancer

doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 24, Issue 7

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9151)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

605

WORD

224

HTML

5825

Figures (1-4)

208

Tables (1-2)

145

Sum=7007

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1109

Download

1035

Sum=2144

Feb 21, 2018 (publication date) through Apr 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (16)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2018; 24(7): 810-818
Published online Feb 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810

Table 1 Characteristics of patients in cohort 2 n (%)

		CTC count
	All patients	Low (CTC ≤ 17)	High (CTC > 17)
	n = 43	n = 23	n = 20
Age
Mean (range)	64 (39-89)	65 (39-89)	64 (48-83)
Sex
Male	32 (74.4)	15 (65.2)	20 (85.0)
Female	11 (25.6)	8 (34.8)	3 (15.0)
ECOG
0-1	36 (83.7)	22 (95.6)	14 (70.0)
2-4	7 (16.3)	1 (4.3)	6 (30.0)
Primary tumor location
Distal oesophageal	12 (27.9)	8 (34.8)	4 (20.0)
Gastroesophageal junction	14 (32.6)	4 (17.4)	10 (50.0)
Gastric	17 (37.5)	11 (47.8)	6 (30.0)
Stage
II	18 (41.9)	13 (56.5)	5 (25.0)
III	6 (14.0)	4 (17.4)	2 (10.0)
IV	19 (44.2)	6 (26.1)	13 (65.0)

CTC: Circulating tumor cell; ECOG: Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status.

Citation: Brungs D, Lynch D, Luk AW, Minaei E, Ranson M, Aghmesheh M, Vine KL, Carolan M, Jaber M, de Souza P, Becker TM. Cryopreservation for delayed circulating tumor cell isolation is a valid strategy for prognostic association of circulating tumor cells in gastroesophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(7): 810-818
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i7/810.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810