Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3786-3798
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3786
Table 3 Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound score vs contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma
SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAccuracyAUC(95%CI)P value
Training set (n = 117)
CEUS LI-RADS0.9360.6910.7730.9050.8210.813(0.744, 0.882)0.000
CEUS score0.8710.9460.9470.8670.9060.958(0.924, 0.993)
Validation set (n = 59)
CEUS LI-RADS1.0000.4850.6051.0000.7120.742(0.656, 0.829)0.000
CEUS score0.8850.9090.8850.9090.8980.953(0.907, 0.999)
≤ 5.0 cm subgroup (n = 59)
CEUS LI-RADS0.9170.6000.6110.9130.7290.758(0.658, 0.858)0.000
CEUS score0.7500.8860.8180.8380.8310.902(0.824, 0.980)
≤ 3.0 cm subgroup (n = 19)
CEUS LI-RADS0.8570.7500.6670.9000.7900.804(0.614, 0.993)0.512
CEUS score0.5710.9170.8000.7860.7900.833(0.636, 1.000)