Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2018; 24(2): 274-289
Published online Jan 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274
Table 2 Positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization for the patients enrolled in the ToGA trial[10,11,27]
AuthorCountriesYear,Type of publicationN° patientsrandomizationSiteStageRegimenResponse rateResectability rateSurvival rate (HR; p)Node dissection (D1,D2, others)
Yonemura et al[29] Japan1993 Abstract55 Tot 29 NAC + S 26 SGC IVPMUEAdv NAC + SAdv NAC + SAdv NAC+S Rates NRNR
Shchepotin et al[30] Ukraine1995 Abstract146 Tot 50 S 49 IVCH + S 47 IACH + SGC NRNRAdv IACH + SAdv IACH + SAdv IACH + S P < 0.001NR
Kang et al[31] South Korea1996 Abstract107 Tot 54 S 53 NAC + SGC III/IVPEFNRAdv NAC + SNo difference P = 0.114NR
Lygidakis et al[32] Greece1999 Paper59 Tot 19 S 20 NAC + S + IVCH 20 NAC + SGC All stagesMitomycin-C + 5-FU + FA + FarmorubicinNRNRAdv NAC + S + IVCHNR
Takiguchi et al[33] Japan2000 Abstract262 Tot 139 S 123 NAC + SGC III/IV5FU + CDDPAdv NAC + SAdv NAC+SAdv NAC + S P = 0.0996NR
Wang et al[22] China2000 Paper60 Tot 30 S 30 NAC + SEGJ NR5FUAdv NAC + SNRAdv NAC + S P = 0.17NR
Kobayashi et al[35] Japan2000 Paper171 Tot 80 S 91 NAC + SAGCFUDRNRNRAdv S P = 0.010NR
Hartgrink et al[4] The Netherlands2004 Paper59 Tot 30 S 29 NAC + SProper AGC (not EGC)FAMTX32% CR or PREQUALAdv S 34% S vs 21% NAC + S P = 0.017At least 15 nodes
Nio et al[36] Japan2004 Paper295 Tot 193 S 102 NAC + SGC All stages > 50% stage IUFTNRNROverall No Adv. NAC + S P = 0.6878 stage II/III -pN + Adv. NAC + S P = 0.0486D2 48% S 56% NAC + S
Zhao et al[37] China2006 Paper60 Tot 20 5’-DFUR 20 5FU + CF 20 SGC All stages5’-DFUR Or 5FU+CF5’-DFUR and 5FU + CF increase AI and reduce PINRNRNR
Cunningham et al[17] United Kingdom2006 Paper503 Tot 250 S 253 NAC + SGC, EGJ, LE All stagesEpirubicin Cisplatinum 5-FUDiameter 5 cm vs 3 cm P < 0.001 T1 + T2 stages > NAC + S P = 0.002NRAdv NAC + S OS/DFS 23% S 36.3%/NAC+S HR 0.75/0.66 P = 0.009/0.001 more evident for EGJD2 40% S 42% NAC + S
Schumacher et al[15] Germany2010 Paper282/144 Tot 72 S 72 NAC + SGC, EGJ (Siewert II, III) stages III, IVCisplatinum + FFAdv in S Tumor length, thickness and width and P Stages moreR0 67% S 81.9% NAC + S P = 0.036 LN + 76.5% S 61.4% NAC + S P = 0.018No Adv NAC + S 52 ms S 64 ms NAC + S HR = 0.84 P = 0.46D2 94% 92.6% S 95.7% NAC + S
Imano et al[38] Japan2010 Paper63 Tot 16 S 15 CDDP 16 5-FU 16 5-FU + CDDPGC NR5FU or CDDP or 5F +CDDP5-FU + CDDP Increases AI Reduces PINRNo differences in 4 armsD2 in all arms
Biffi et al[39] Italy2010 Paper240/70 Tot 35 S 34 NAC + SEGJ (Siewert II, III), AGTCF65% CR + PRAdv NAC + S (P value NR)not evaluated premature interruption for low accrualD2 in almost all cases
Qu et al[40] China2010 Paper78 Tot 39 S 39 NAC + SAGCPaclitaxel and FOLFOX4Adv NAC + S P = 0.001Adv NAC + S P = 0.025Adv NAC+S P = 0.006 at 2 yrNR
Ychou et al[18] France2011 Paper224 Tot 111 S 113 NAC + SLE,EGJ,GC All stagesCDDP + 5FUAdv NAC + S P = 0.054Adv NAC + S P = 0.04OS (NAC + S/S) = 38/24 HR = 0.69 P = 0.02 DFS (NAC + S/S) = 34/19 HR= 0.65 P = 0.003 more evident for EGJD2 recommended No data on the effect of D2 vs other LN dissection