Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2017; 23(6): 1098-1105
Published online Feb 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.1098
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients according to procedure group n (%)
EGD (n = 167)Colonoscopy (n = 167)Combined group1 (n = 122)P value
Sex0.099
Male71 (42.5)89 (53.3)64 (52.5)
Female96 (57.5)78 (46.7)58 (47.5)
Age (yr)0.878
5043 (25.7)44 (26.3)29 (76.2)
> 50124 (74.3)123 (73.7)93 (76.2)
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.622.923.3 (76.2)0.245
Previous sedation endoscopy0.310
Yes137 (82.5)135 (80.8)92 (75.4)
No29 (17.5)32 (19.2)30 (24.6)
Midazolam (mg)
First dose4.14.34.40.014
Second dose1.51.61.70.055
Third dose1.01.61.50.269
Fourth dose1.51.51.90.881
Total midazolam dose (mg)4.45.06.4< 0.005
No. of midazolam injections1.21.42.2< 0.005
Time (min)
Midazolam injection to procedure start5.14.54.70.327
Total procedure time3.523.742.4< 0.005
Inter-procedure gap19.5
Procedure finish to antidote injection12.813.112.10.482
Satisfaction with sedation during endoscopy0.016
Very satisfied81 (48.5)51 (30.5)46 (37.7)
Satisfied74 (44.3)86 (51.5)58 (47.5)
Neutral7 (4.2)19 (11.4)11 (9.0)
Dissatisfied5 (3)11 (6.6)7 (5.7)
Very dissatisfied---