Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2013; 19(10): 1527-1540
Published online Mar 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1527
Table 3 Results of clinical trials with probiotics in patients with Crohn’s disease
Ref.Patients (n)Duration of therapyProbiotic strainsDose (CFU/d)Outcomes
Malchow et al[135]243 moEscherichia coli Nissle 19172.5 × 1010Maintaining the remission
Guslandi et al[136]326 moSaccharomyces boulardii1 gPostsurgical prevention of CD recurrence (relapse rate probiotic+ 5-ASA vs 5-ASA alone)
Prantera et al[137]451 yrLactobacillus GG12 × 109Postsurgical prevention of CD recurrence (no effects)
Schultz al[138]116 moLactobacillus GG2 × 109Probiotics are not superior to placebo in maintaining remission
Bousvaros et al[139]751 yrLactobacillus GG2 × 1010Probiotics are not superior to placebo in maintaining remission
Marteau et al[140]986 moLactobacillus johnsonii4 × 109Postsurgical prevention of CD recurrence (recurrence rate decreased vs placebo)
Chermesh et al[141]3024 moSynbiotic 2000 (Pediococcus pentoseceus, Lactobacillus raffinolactis, Lactobacillus paracasi susp paracsei, Lactobacillusplantarum 2362) and 4 fermentable fibers vs placebo10¹¹Postsurgical prevention of CD recurrence (NS)
Van Gossum et al[142]7012 wkLactobacillus johnsonii or placebo1010Postsurgical prevention of CD recurrence (NS)
Rolfe et al[143]7 RCTsNo benefit of probiotics in the maintenance of remission of CD
Rahimi et al[144]8 RCTsNone benefit for probiotic treatment in the maintenance of clinical remission of CD